To protect dishonest people is to condemn them to their own hells.

L. Ron Hubbard in Los Angeles, California.

L. Ron Hubbard in Los Angeles, California. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Individual rights were not originated to protect criminals but to bring freedom to honest men. Into this area of protection then dived those who needed “freedom” and “individual liberty” to cover their own questionable activities.

Freedom is for honest people. No man who is not himself honest can be free—he is in his own trap. When his own deeds cannot be disclosed then he is a prisoner; he must withhold himself from his fellows and he is a slave to his own conscience. Freedom must be deserved before there is any freedom possible.

To protect dishonest people is to condemn them to their own hells. By making “individual rights” a synonym for “protect the criminal” one helps to bring about a slave state for all; for where “individual liberty” is abused, an impatience with it arises which at length sweeps us all away. “
L. Ron Hubbard
(HCOB 8 February 1960 “Honest People Have Rights, Too”)

In response to EVIL

Open letter:

Catherine Ethier

My quote of the day:

“Being mentally challenged is a disability but being EVIL is a choice!”

In response to Michelle Butcher – Sterling who wrote: “Pierre, some advice. Lose the crazy bi*ch …”

Preaching family destruction is EVIL! Promoting family disconnection is EVIL! It takes some real EVIL to split a family.

In regard to your continuous drama for many years now, I will reiterate that no one has ever been authorized to speak on my behalf , I have NEVER made any postings on your site. Although I am very flattered by your keen interest toward me  ( I recall one time when you, Michelle called me “a public figure” in a letter you wrote to your ISP), I want to firmly note that your own postings (which you often contribute to me) , your “snipplets”, other exerts out of context , “telepathic mind reading” realizations, alterations, misrepresentations and other assertions are only your personal fabrications and that of the members of your group.

 Thank you for generating traffic to my site. It has been dully noted!

I wish you well Michelle and always.

Catherine

Note: Why Michelle Butcher (Ryan)- Sterling  is actually afraid to exchange 5 minutes direct communication with me but would spend couple of years in speculations and fabrications whining on various boards and plain misrepresenting matters of fact. For example Michelle’s claim that ” I have sent lawyers after her” is untrue.  I have NEVER hired a lawyer , in fact the lawyer’s letter sent to Michelle was from her business partner and ended with the phrase : “thank you for your business”. I was not sent a copy of it. Michelle went on and on and on by claiming that I have been “threatening her with lawyers” , “DMCA take down threat …” , ” Extortion” and so on fabrications. This is simply untrue! I  have asked Michelle to stop faigaming my child and remove false fabrications. Michelle if you have any questions would of been fair to ask me, not the various manipulated members of your board. How can this DRAMA go on for so long? Michelle, not even a word of what you are saying is to be believed! Daily drama and fabrications! Come on people , give me a break ! This amount of drama for being asked to remove the smear about a disabled child ?

Michelle wrote “Pierre, some advice. Lose the crazy bi*ch …”  – this is the Church of Scientology enemy line. Along with smearing disabled children, Michelle and Aida have partnered into what becomes a professional home and marriage wrecking. Michelle’s EVIL  line sounds very familiar. In actual fact it closely resembles the line of Barbro Wennberg . Barbro Wennberg is a staff at the Church of Scientology who aimed to split our family writing on my husband’s folder an order: “dump the bi*ch“. Let me tell you more about Barbro. Barbro was for  two days caretaker of Lisa McPherson. Along with others she  kept Lisa  confined in a hotel room and  did not take her to the hospital ( Link1  , Link2 , Link 3, Link 4) when needed. Lisa McPherson as you all know died.

My husband was 20 years Sea Org staff working at no pay as an auditor. My husband left the Church of Scientology after he was coerced to provide loans to parishioners for services at the Church of Scientology and coerced otherwise to  provide money directly to the Church. Those  were funds needed for his medical treatment and funds vital for a necessary follow up surgery. While on staff at the Church my husband  was in an accident that caused him a severe injury. He was hit by a drunk taxi driver . My husband spent several days in coma , his leg was surgically reconstructed and he was told he will never walk again. He walked but the loans he generously gave to parishioners for their benefit were never repaid, there were no money left for his medical treatment , he could not afford to pay for a required follow up surgery and this resulted in a DISABILITY FOR LIFE. For his kindness my husband had to cope with disability for life and was consistently ridiculed by associates of the Church, their allies and the manipulated by them crowds. There were numerous character assassination attacks carried out maliciously by publishing defamatory libelous  matters without lawful justification or excuse and only meant to injure the reputation of my husband and my family by exposing us to hatred, contempt and ridicule that was designed to insult us. This is criminal!

Also while working as a staff in the Church my husband sustained injuries and severe life threatening conditions. The last one I personally witnessed was treated by Dr. Minkoff ( also involved in the Lisa McPherson’s case). My husband was instructed by the MLO that the Church is not maintaining workers compensation insurance for their own employees and will not cover the treatment even if he was going to die. Workers compensation coverage for employees is mandatory regulatory requirement to cover employee treatment for injuries on the job. We have kept silent about this kind of abuse for many years now just to be abused even more.

You can make another drama, fabricate some more untrue statements , abuse me and my family some more. That is all you are about. I don’t care! More traffic to my site! Thank you.

enc. Copy of my server logs. Michelle Butcher / Ryan – Sterling is my best promoter:

Pierre_Ethier_Michelle_Sterling

My site stats went up thanks to Michelle. In addition the site visitors kept reading and reading. Very well done Michelle!

Pierre_Ethier_Michelle_Sterling-best-promoter

My response to the FreeZone PR Terril Park who has been calling me names:

 I would rather be a “Crazy Bi*ch”, than an EVIL Witch hosting as a FreeZone Party Special Guest of honor well known to her alleged  child molester and a FZ Class VIII ( refer to video below)  . Couple of years prior to hosting ” the matador” on her FreeZone party, Aida had told me that this FZ Class VIII is a “s*x pervert” .  Her own words. Few years after she went on to promote and PR the ” matador”  and FZ Class VIII who according to Aida was a harmful pervert. I would rather sound “crazy” than willingly to throw under the carpet corrupt practices, cover up  abuse and fairgame of children.

Terril Park is incapable to properly duplicate and any statements of his on my behalf are grossly distorted and unauthorized. We have received correspondence from a financial sponsor of his claiming to have ” hijacked his email” ( her own words) and using his email address and accounts. I will be more than happy to provide a copy upon request.

  Wow

23028234293 24.06.2013 21:46:09 72.193.0.181 United States Nevada Las Vegas http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/pierre-ethier-cl…
23028234294 24.06.2013 21:46:00 72.193.0.181 United States Nevada Las Vegas http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/
23028234295 24.06.2013 21:45:54 72.193.0.181 United States Nevada Las Vegas http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/rick-melrose…

Keeps coming , no kidding:

28.06.2013 11:52:37 United States Nevada Las Vegas http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/
28.06.2013 11:52:35 United States Nevada Las Vegas http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/

Interesting data logs:

27.06.2013 13:09:37 United States Florida Zephyrhills http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/rick-melrose…
27.06.2013 05:07:22 United States Florida Zephyrhills http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/rick-melrose…
27.06.2013 05:22:41 United States Florida Pinellas Park http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/warni…

The Church A-E keeps checking:

28.06.2013 22:15:51 United States Florida Zephyrhills http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/rick-melrose…
29.06.2013 22:41:19 United States Florida Zephyrhills http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/rick-melrose…

But hey , here is a fixated person:

01.07.2013 16:45:28 Australia Victoria Melbourne http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/03/31/comin…
29.06.2013 18:04:53 Australia Victoria Melbourne http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/catherine-et…
29.06.2013 13:43:21 Australia Victoria Melbourne http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/rick-melrose…
29.06.2013 05:48:58 Australia Victoria Melbourne http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/rick-melrose…
29.06.2013 05:48:58 Australia Victoria Melbourne http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/tag/rick-melrose…

Related articles:

Link 1 

Link 2

Positive change

caterina-ethierAre we attracting what we want in life? Do you know what you want? Individuals often do not take the time to focus on abundance. So often they really focus on the next material thing like the bigger car or the bigger house. More money , more toys and more stuff. Or  some individuals focus on less. Less work or less weight. As the individuals work on improving themselves they eventually find themselves able to attract their wants and needs as a living magnet. It is more important than ever to actually define what you want in order to attract the right crowd and energize your environment. And again it has come the time to learn from the lessons in the past, re-define more clearly our goals to truly reconnect with the fine spiritual dimensions.

More than anything Pierre’s work has been about helping people to shift to thriving, from just surviving. Not all challenges can be overcome with knowledge alone as sometimes individuals need help when the going gets tough.

Also, personal support, guidance and counseling is about more than overcoming challenges. For many it is about making the shift from good to great. This is why after refining his goals, Pierre has stated to carefully rebuilding his communication network and associations. The aim  is to focus into helping the able to become more able.

This is why Pierre has shifted his approach in development of personal and business networks to balance accountability, learning , planned actions based on careful examinations and screening  with the expectation of positive life reflection. Pierre has build resilience while dealing with all inherited challenges in the field . He wish no part of any venture promoting and favoring insanity and evil doing.

Coming soon : Seminars about Scientology in the Free Field Q&A with Pierre Ethier , Class XII

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII-Auditor

Skype ID : CommChannel

We are preparing Skype Seminars about “Scientology in the Free Field Q&A with Pierre Ethier, Class XII”.

For pre-registration and submission of interesting topics and questions please contact our relationship management coordinator at class_xii@hotmail.com with SEMINAR on the subject line. Limited number of participants. There is NO CHARGE for participants. Seminars are delivered in French and English.

Skype ID: “CommChannel” an advanced spiritual guidance network for people who are dedicated to spiritual advancement and improvement.

The group is facilitated by Pierre Ethier – a Scientology Class XII auditor who over 4 decades has been providing advanced Spiritual Counselling to people seeking to become more able by strictly applying what has been demonstrated to work and helps people attain self-fulfillment to lead more successful and happier lives. As people go closer to the Advanced Spiritual levels and find increased joy in life, their lives are affected for the better.

The Advanced Scientology Rundowns are based on an important breakthrough research and understanding in the field spirituality and the mind. The Advanced Scientology Rundowns can be a beautiful experience of massive increases in affinity for others. The Advanced Scientology Rundowns address every dynamic and go deeper into the case level resolving hesitations, evil purposes, address the main areas of irrationality that introvert a being or lesser his/her power. The receiving the Advanced Rundowns lead in easing aberrations and also can lead to a new life and a new viewpoint of spiritual and mental rationality. One can eliminate fundamental aberrations and can increase certainty, stability and control, even in the face of the worse adversity.

Pierre Ethier is an applied Scientology auditor who, among other rundowns, mastered the famous “ Ls “ Rundowns in their powerful original. For over a decade Pierre Ethier was acknowledged as the best auditor on the Planet and he was recipient of the Top Auditor of the Year Award every single year. Pierre studied and delivered numerous of the so called Flag Only Rundowns, including the Original Super Power Rundown, Knowledge Rundown , Case Cracker Rundown , New Vitality Rundown , Fixated Person Rundown , Dynamic Sort-out Assessment , NOTs Stability Rundown, Held Down Seven Rundown, Int. by Dynamics Rundown, Havingness Rundown , The Prosperity Rundown, The Money Rundown, Profession Intensive , address variety of handlings like spiritual difficulties, issues, ethics , case situations and other.

 

Happy Orthodox Easter

HPIM2004Orthodox Christians celebrate Pascha according to the Easter date in the Julian calendar. Pascha is the most important event in the church calendar in the Orthodox Church. Many Orthodox Christians attend church liturgies during the Holy Week that leads up to Easter Sunday. The Easter Sunday church liturgy is joyous as it celebrates Jesus Christ’s resurrection, as told in the Christian bible.

The period before Easter, known as Lent, is also a time of strict fasting. Orthodox Christians observe this fasting ritual before celebrating Easter Sunday with a feast, where meat and dairy products can be eaten again. Another tr

adition observed in Orthodox Christian churches is the blessing of food baskets. The baskets are usually filled with bread, cheese, meat, eggs, butter, salt, and other types of food used for Paschal celebrations.

One of the most common questions Orthodox Christians are asked is, why Orthodox Christians don’t celebrate Easter/Holy Pascha with everyone else?

Pierre-Ethier

 

Often, those asking are Orthodox Christians who know that some years we do have the same Easter observance, others we don’t, so why don’t we celebrate the feast of feasts of the Christian year with other Christians?

The answer to the question is found in two areas of human life that are among the least popular — mathematics and history.
Clearly, for both Western and Eastern Orthodox Christians, the date of the feast differs from year to year. That’s because we use a different calculus for determining the date. So here is where most people say, “OK, I get it, you differ, I guess you have your reasons.” But those who are not math-phobic press on to ask why we have a different calculus, and how the calculus is different for East and West.

These names, dates and events are not quite in a galaxy far, far away, but to many it seems that way. Quartodecimians, Nicea I, Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem, Rome, Athanasius, Constantine, 325, for starters, only serve to either glaze over the eyes or scramble the brain. Unless some of those names and dates bring out the response, “That was in ‘The Da Vinci Code.’ “ Dan Brown’s novel is not a reliable or recommended source for this question.HPIM2006 The best place to start is with what Christians have in common when it comes to Easter/Holy Pascha, which puts the difference in the date of the celebration in its proper perspective. All of us celebrate on a Sunday, the first day of the week, since that is when the gospels tell us Christ rose from the dead. This itself was a disputed issue resolved at the First Council of Nicea in 325 AD.

The alternative was a date that occurred on a different day every year, and that day was the date of Passover according to the lunar calendar followed by the Jewish people at the time of Jesus’ death and resurrection. Subsequent modifications to the Jewish calendar resulted in the Council of Nicea decreeing that the calculation of the date of Pascha and of Passover were independent of each other. Sunday is the day on which the resurrection occurred, and as the first day it is understood by Christians as the beginning of the New Creation, the day without end, the eighth day.

But the issue remained, how to calculate which Sunday, a task given to the Church in Alexandria, which was renowned for its astronomers. The astronomers of Alexandria came up with a table of cycles of 19 years upon which the date of Pascha was determined, factoring in the full moon after the vernal equinox. Those dates were calculated according to the Julian calendar used at the time. Later, the West adopted a table of cycles that had 84 years.

While all the Christian world initially shared one calendar and shared one date for the celebration, the change to the Gregorian calendar in the West in the late 16th century, and the continuing use of the Julian calendar in the East, resulted in an initial difference of 11 days between the two, a difference which is now 13 days. Further complicating this was the date on which the vernal equinox was established in the Alexandrian table, a fixed date that was recognized as inaccurate on a yearly basis, but established as a base line for calculations.

The decisions made at the Council of Nicea in 325 were made to guarantee a universal celebration of the greatest feast on the Christian calendar by all Christians. This goal is recognized today as one we need to recover. Steps in that direction were taken in 1997 at a meeting of representatives of the Christian Churches held in Aleppo, Syria.
Further discussions have been broached between the Roman Catholic Church and the Ecumenical Patriarchate. This year, the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem, covering most of the Holy Land, Cyprus and Jordan, will celebrate with their Orthodox brethren, and have requested papal approval to do this permanently.

More than any text or meeting, this provides a common witness and a great hope that all — Orthodox, Roman Catholic and Protestant Christians of all denominations — can celebrate the cause of our hope and the foundation of our faith together, with at least some of the unity for which Christ prayed before His arrest: that all may be one.

Portland Conference: THE SAFE-POINTING THE FUTURE OF INDEPENDENT SCIENTOLOGY May 3rd-5th 2013

Updates in the conference site: http://www.indiefuture2013.com

What: A gathering of like-minded individuals that care about the legacy of L Ron Hubbard and want to ensure that the materials he developed to help mankind are not lost to the evil men that believe themselves control the materials and seek to monopolize the tech.

Purpose: To brainstorm and inspire each other to be creative in bringing about Ron’s dream of a free planet where the depraved desires of a few cannot stop freedom us all. We wish to be generative of ideas and energy to make it safe to practice Independent or Protestant Scientology in the field, To make it possible to be free of harassment and suppression. Other than these items the conference is free of agenda and is largely created by the participants.We will get out of  it what we bring to it.

Location: Portland , US ( please email to  future.scientology@gmail.com  for details)

Picture

Picture
Picture

Picture

Picture

To attend or request more information about this event send email to future.scientology@gmail.com or consult http://www.indiefuture2013.com/index.html
Costs: We are attempting to cover costs to hold the conference in this magnificent facility – we are attempting to hold costs per person to less than $300. This would include conference fees sleeping room (double occupancy) for Friday night and Saturday night.UPDATE:The conference fees are $275/per person with double occupancy for the rooms.
If you book the room in advance (before 12 noon) Friday there is a 10% discount.
So with discount two people is $495.00For those that should attend but may needed financial assistance to attend, we will try to make that possible as well.Tentative Schedule :Fri 4pm – 7:30pm Conference check-in explore the space
7:30 PM – Cocktail reception. Meet and greet.
9:00 PM — Opening session – Orentation
10:00 PM – 11:00 Show and tell.
Relaxed conversation and breaking the ice in the recreation area.Sat
7:AM – 9:AM Breakfast buffet
9:00 – 12:00 pm Our journeys through Scientology. Sharing a personal experiences in a group setting.
12:00 PM – 1: PM LUNCH
1:00 PM – 2:PM Q&A with Pierre Ethier,  Class XII Auditor.  ( conference call , dial in )
3:00 PM – 7:PM (Open — suggestions welcome)
7:00 DINNERSun:
7:00 AM Spiritual and recreation  activities.
Scientology related groups break off sessions.
11:00 AM – 1:00 PM BRUNCH
Skiing and other recreation activities.
4:00 PM END OFF – Return to PDX.To attend or request more information about this event send email to future.scientology@gmail.com
Inquire about a conference bridge as a dial up on a (Skype) conference call may be available.

John McMaster – The First Clear

Audio files:

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/70…0is%20Love.mp3

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/Am…%20Freedom.mp3

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/Am…rizing%202.mp3

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/Am…cation%202.mp3

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/Am…282%29%202.mp3

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/Am…iew%20KPFK.mp3

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/Am…eators%203.mp3

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/Po…0Processes.mp3

Video file  1.4 GB:

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/43776862/Jo…Master%201.mp4

Coming soon : Seminars about Scientology in the Free Field Q&A with Pierre Ethier , Class XII

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII-Auditor

Skype ID : CommChannel

We are preparing Skype Seminars about “Scientology in the Free Field Q&A with Pierre Ethier, Class XII”.

For pre-registration and submission of interesting topics and questions please contact our relationship management coordinator at class_xii@hotmail.com with SEMINAR on the subject line. Limited number of participants. There is NO CHARGE for participants. Seminars are delivered in French and English.

Skype ID: “CommChannel” an advanced spiritual guidance network for people who are dedicated to spiritual advancement and improvement.

The group is facilitated by Pierre Ethier – a Scientology Class XII auditor who over 4 decades has been providing advanced Spiritual Counselling to people seeking to become more able by strictly applying what has been demonstrated to work and helps people attain self-fulfilment to lead more successful and happier lives. As people go closer to the Advanced Spiritual levels and find increased joy in life, their lives are affected for the better.

The Advanced Scientology Rundowns are based on an important breakthrough research and understanding in the field spirituality and the mind. The Advanced Scientology Rundowns can be a beautiful experience of massive increases in affinity for others. The Advanced Scientology Rundowns address every dynamic and go deeper into the case level resolving hesitations, evil purposes, address the main areas of irrationality that introvert a being or lesser his/her power. The receiving the Advanced Rundowns lead in easing aberrations and also can lead to a new life and a new viewpoint of spiritual and mental rationality. One can eliminate fundamental aberrations and can increase certainty, stability and control, even in the face of the worse adversity.

Pierre Ethier is an applied Scientology auditor who, among other rundowns, mastered the famous “ Ls “ Rundowns in their powerful original. For over a decade Pierre Ethier was acknowledged as the best auditor on the Planet and he was recipient of the Top Auditor of the Year Award every single year. Pierre studied and delivered numerous of the so called Flag Only Rundowns, including the Original Super Power Rundown, Knowledge Rundown , Case Cracker Rundown , New Vitality Rundown , Fixated Person Rundown , Dynamic Sort-out Assessment , NOTs Stability Rundown, Held Down Seven Rundown, Int. by Dynamics Rundown, Havingness Rundown , The Prosperity Rundown, The Money Rundown, Profession Intensive , address variety of handlings like spiritual difficulties, issues, ethics , case situations and other.

Why interships are so vital for the auditor delivering the Ls.

Written by Site Admin ( The author is not Pierre Ethier)

Below is a summary of concerns raised by Karen De La Carriere in regard to the lack of proper auditor training for delivery of the Ls in the independent field. IFA / APIS did not provide me with a response and did not address their certification scheme shortcomings in the light of the issues raised below. I want to thank Karen for raising the concerns below and to thank her for taking the safety of the PCs at heart. It requires an impressive amount of dedication in studies and perfection of your own techniques to master the proper delivery of the Ls. It is even more impressive the amount of care  about the wellbeing of the PC  that motivated auditors like Karen to master their tech.

The current situation is that untrained auditors deliver  while PR-ing their business practice with “success stories” and no case gain. On the background are their failed cases spiritually broken, hopeless and desperate. There were instances of   corrupt practices sabotaging the PC ‘s spiritual case. Those practices led to botched Ls and/or extended the delivery time cycle for practitioner’s financial profit to four or even ten times beyond the normal Ls delivery cycle. It is unethical for a trainee to use the PC as a “cash cow” while charging excessive hourly rates. For example the average standardly delivered L12 should take not more than 25 hours delivered in a week.  L11 should be delivered in a week and L10 takes 2-3 weeks.  This is based on case average statistics of over 5000 cases. A warning sign of improper processing of L12 would be if you have received it  in over 4 months period in 130 hours. The Ls are very powerful processing and are designed by LRH to be delivered on an intensive daily schedule in order to produce a successful case gain. The pricing for the Ls is recommended to be based on a flat fee for the whole completed cycle.  It is definitely NOT recommended to get one session a week and if your auditor can not accommodate you in his schedule or shortchange you with  advice  that is against your best interest, this should be a warning sign. One session a week or less on  the Ls is a violation of C/S Series #1. How trustworthy is a testimonial from an individual who is trying to promote their own business with violations of the basic auditing rules that LRH established himself. LRH has designed L11 and L12 to be delivered in about a week and L10 to be delivered in about 3 weeks.

An example of abuse comes to my mind , when a PC was forced to bare the cost of living out of town for 4 months and “completed” L12 in 130 hours paying to a junior class auditor more than what he would of paid in the Church of Scientology for a Class XII auditing.  Normally  this cycle should of taken less than  a week and in 95% of the cases takes less than 2 intensives.

I strongly believe that auditors who really care about their PCs will undergo the proper training, including internships, studies and drills as described by Karen. The independent field needs to adhere to higher standards to KSW.

December 21, 2011

Karen De La Carriere: ….[name omitted ] ….. “never had any Ls training. He certainly did not have the very complex and unique training of Class X, XI and Class XII. There is an enormous study of LRH CSed folders and special testsn to understand why LRH CSed that way. ” ….[name omitted ] ….” never came anywhere near this section of the training.”

Karen De La Carriere : “ The Ls are like a Ferrari. Most people can drive one up to 100mph but the minute you get into 150 mph, when things so wrong, they go terribly wrong. The Ls are high performance spiritual work that require expert handling by qualified Ls auditors. This requires interneships and not done by reading ‘hat write ups”.”

Karen De La Carriere : “When something goes wrong …either in a high performance vehicle or intense spiritual work ~~ the results can be catastrophic if one does not know how to recover from trouble. Lisa Mcpherson, 3 weeks after L-11 (see the image on the web of her proudly displaying her L-11 Cert and smiling) went Type III, taking off her clothes and walking naked on Fort harrison Avenue. This is an example of how badly it can backfire.”

Karen De La Carriere : “What we are discussing is an expanded range, that which can boost you so high spiritually and take you into the lofty heights of heaven can also backfire in the other direction and send you into hell.”

Karen De La Carriere: “ I will never participate in any action that does not guarantee the safety and well being of pcs. Only knowing, training and understanding the length an breadth of the procedures and their remedies can give the results LRH intended for these rundowns.”

Karen De La Carriere : “One example of how Interneships are so vital is that the AUDITING STYLE of Ls auditing is different. You have to un-do all the TRs 1-4 you have ever learned all your life and learn “TR L10 style” It is designed to impact the case differe…ntly. This needs to be drilled and drilled and drilled on video and one has to watch one’ own videos day after day, month after month til one has perfected one’s performance and til it is second nature. There is nothing in the field in current set ups that can even come near approximating Ls training. Each interneship takes MONTHS of 40 hour to 60 hours in the chair of flawless VWD sessions for graduation to be approved. But the pc is the beneficiary and is now in safe hands. The safety and guaranteed stability of the pc is the primary importance here. To hell with any other consideration than the PC and the PC’s benefit.”

The Sad Fate of Lisa McPherson

WARNING

WARNING: At the behest of the Church of Scientology Office of Special Affairs (OSA) a cowardly individual has been sending emails of an illegal and hateful nature while seeking to attribute them to me. The warped and perverted communications impersonating me are using the email address friendsofpierre@XXXXXX.com.

In most cases they contain significantly altered and embellished private communications, designed to upset and enturbulate people, so that they will be distracted from their mission of repairing cases that have been messed up through botched and reckless counseling.

Pierre Ethier

Note from admin

Pierre Ethier does not endorse any groups , associations and independent auditors unless otherwise specified via private communication. Any arrangements for Case Supervision must be confirmed directly with Pierre, as well as the current status validation of training, certifications and good standing related to ethics, cramming and application of standard tech. Pierre Ethier DOES NOT endorse the delivery of the Ls by other auditors or trainees. Please be warned that there were multiple instances when auditors have been fraudulently claiming that Pierre Ethier is C/S-ing their practice and on few occasions have been fraudulently charging the PC under a false pretence.

Pierre Ethier DOES NOT endorse the delivery of the Ls by other auditors or trainees, this specifically apply to TREY LOTZ whom Pierre Ethier never actually trained on L12 nor L10 after too many flubs,and insisting on auditing pcs that were clearly not setup, (ignoring FLUNKS and explicit interdiction from Pierre as the C/S), in addition to Trey refusal to correct on L11 and on chronically missing witholds on his pcs. Trey Lotz has NOT completed & attested training and is NOT certified by Pierre Ethier to deliver the Ls . According to Trey Lotz he informed his public that Pierre is not C/Sing for him. Karen de La Carriere has confirmed that she has never C/Sed for Trey Lotz nor trained him on the Ls. She has not provided him any Ls materials either.

Related link.

——-

Field auditors affiliated with the Corporate Church of Scientology deliver auditing up to Clear and typically have NO EXPERIENCE in delivering upper levels .Field auditors refer their PC to the Orgs for 15% FSM commission which they receive for services purchased by the PC from the Church. A field auditor usually comes out in the free field with no experience auditing beyond Clear and lacks the discipline to audit under C/S..

Flag only rundowns (which Pierre studied and delivered – e.g. Original Super Power Rundown, Knowledge Rundown , Case Cracker Rundown , New Vitality Rundown , Fixated Person Rundown , Dynamic Sort-out Assessment , NOTs Stability Rundown, Held Down Seven Rundown, Int. by Dynamics Rundown, Havingness Rundown , The Prosperity Rundown, The Money Rundown, Profession Intensive ) address variety of handlings like money and spiritual difficulties, issues, ethics , case situations and other. The Ls , Flag Only Rundowns [Delivered at Flag Only] , NOTs [Delivered only in Advanced Organizations / Sea Orgs] , Power and Superpower require advanced auditor skills and trained C/S. The above rundowns should not be delivered without the supervision of a trained C/S. C/S training is required as some of the handlings are in the C/S materials. The authentic Flag Only Rundowns materials have not been released in the Free Field.

All information contained, written and/or supplied shall be deemed to be without prejudice and is intended only for general education use.

Click here for a summary of concerns about delivery of the Ls in the FreeZone/ Independent field by Karen De La Carriere

Related articles:

http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/vital-information-about-the-ls-rundowns/

http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/programs/why-interships-are-so-vital-for-the-auditor-delivering-the-ls/

http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/articles/the-sad-fate-of-lisa-mcpherson/

Overpriced Church Services in the Church promo:

1994 Church of Scientology price list for services

RTC publication found on google search:

2002 Church of Scientology price list for the Ls

Author:Катя

Related article: Vendetta

  • Black Dianetics and/or reverse processing is often done on the person in an effort to cave him/her in. Black Dianetics is used in the free field by auditors who apply processes sourced by the Church to cave in others or to produce fanatic followers. Typically those auditors never been trained to provide the specific level , lack major data from the rundowns. Their unsuspected subjects rave in euphoria but then constantly get stuck on irrelevant issues, enterbualate and get upset easily. Those kind of people become restimulated, simply unstable and easily manipulated. This is how one produce EVIL, promote EVIL and talk mostly about EVIL doing.
  • When an individual continues to vocalize or write about disagreements with Black PR treatment or anything else about evil practices he/she is being subjected to, a partnership of allies will publish mean-spirited propaganda about that individual. That propaganda inevitably contains the fruits of the personal and private communication and the private life of the targeted individual directed into a smear campaign. Seldom is it done with chapter-and-verse, literal detail which could make the opressor legally accountable. Instead, it is done through a sophisticated and complex propaganda methodology. It requires the development of a dark and evil mindset to create this sort of propaganda.
  •  Ralph Hilton had published an open letter as a part of a Black PR campaign to spread the enemy line around the web. Now over a five years later a crowd of stooges related to the Church are glorifying  Hilton’s full admission of having personal attitude problems , re-stimulation and acting out of EVIL. Ralph Hilton wrote: “I attacked you in return – yes it was evil purposes in restimulation and I know that I woke them up to do it.” It is very wrong to do others in. It is wrong to orchestrate attacks out of your own evil. It is even more wrong to freely advertise your evil intentions like it is something that makes you stand out with promoting your evil and appealing to manipulate the crowd of haters to join you in doing evil to others. Evil remains evil , no matter what shape and form it takes. There is no excuse for evil doing! Be aware that very sadly evil propagates to your associates and allies.

It is time to say ” Enough is Enough” of your evil!

We do not want your evil in our lives!

About compassion

The Los Angeles Dodgers had two visits to the City of Hope. It is something magical to see the smiles that they bring to these patients and feel the compassion in their eyes .  Patients and Visitors enjoyed meeting the players, having their pictures taken with them, and receiving their autographs.


From Left to Right: Blake DeWitt, Rudy Law, Stephen J. Forman, M.D., broadcaster Charley Steiner, Tommy Davis, Fernando Valenzuela, Michael A. Friedman M.D., Tommy Lasorda, Andre Ethier, Brad Ausmus and Hiroki Kuroda.




I love this picture taken in the teen music room! The man on the microphone is Dodgers owner Frank McCourt. As you can see, the guys were having a great time during their jam session.


Left to Right: Matt Kemp, Janet Clayton, Ken Landreaux, Delwyn Young and James McDonald




IS SCIENTOLOGY THE SCIENCE OF EVIL?

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII-Auditor

L. Ron Hubbard, and even Psychiatry define Insanity as an Idee Fixe that dominate an individual so much that they become unable to act or think except through that fixed idea.

Out of the OT X materials, CHARACTER, comes the following definition: “Insanity is the adoption of a Single Stable Datum, at the exclusion of all others”.

The dramatization of Evil purposes, especially when it is being directed at people, starts with an act of Cowardice: the individual is unable/ unwilling to face the true source of his/her inner conflicts and seeks to put the entire blame on a target they feel will be “popular” and easily agreed upon by those with similar mental problems.  This is well explained in the Policies on “Sources of Troubles”, where a small percentage of people will obsessively seek to lay the entirety of their problems on an individual, book or group. Years of experiences both in and outside the Church conclusively demonstrate that those who blame others for their own condition always greatly exaggerate things and were always suffering from the issues they complain about long before they came across what they now label as the source of their problems.  In the data series, a policy called, “the Why is God” clearly explains that the answer to solving one’s own problem lie within oneself, not in blaming someone else.

A Wise and old Judge that frequently appears on TV has repeatedly observed: “It is easier to confront Anger than Pain”. In other words, when people face some inner suffering, some will try to find an innocent scapegoat to blame every evil on, just like the Jews in the Bible would cast the totality of the Sins and crime of their entire people on a Goat that had until then minded its own business and then cast it out to die in the desert.

It is Evil to seek to harm people of good will!

In my case I have helped over 5000 people, if I count only those I have audited. If I count those I have C/Sed, FES, debugged and given life-saving advice, I get another 5000. I have done a lot of voluntary work and helped thousands of others. After I left the Church, I have worked in coordination with Law Enforcement agencies to help bring criminals and abusers to Justice. I was personally praised by the authorities for my work. There is a continuous stream of people coming to see me for help, either in a professional capacity in my areas of expertise where I hold professional certifications and in my quality as a trained auditor and Case Supervisor. I have helped well over 15,000 people directly or indirectly.

The church of Scientology is well known to use Agents, Stooges and Dupes to promote its pernicious agenda. This sad group of Individual uniformly consist of slow or no case gains (based on actual changes in their life and behavior rather than their own assertions), and who are dramatizing a dark aspect of their case in the misguided and absurd hope that if they succeeded in destroying their target, their problem would suddenly disappear.

Because those individuals commit continuous Present Time overts, including constant manufacturing of lies, cherry picking a few facts while throwing away all others and spreading their vitriol as widely as their meager intellect allow them; their perceptions sink to a very low level. They misinterpret facts and invent absurdities causing them to continuously DEAD-AGENT themselves: their worse PR enemies are themselves. By actual analysis less than 2 1/2% of people reading their drivel view it as anything else than something belonging in the trash can.

This means that 97 -1/2% of people exposed to their drivel correctly recognize it as such.

For 10 years now, my unchanging experience with both the Church of Scientology and its offshoots, including the FreeZONE is that the more desperate their attacks against me, the more theta traffic comes on my lines, the more requests to audit or C/S I receive and the busier I get. I would have to spend thousands of dollars to get the amount of free publicity that those misguided souls give me for free.

A friend of mine, jokingly stated that if thing continue that way, that I ought to consider paying them FSM commissions!

Just like it says in the Anti-Social Personality bulletin says: these people try to burn the House, they end up flooding it instead. In my case: they try to destroy my repute. They mistakenly think they succeed in their eyes, but only their small group of fanatical followers (people that are criminals and a long track of lying, stealing and abusing others) agree. I would never consider auditing any of these individuals. All others either ignore or recognize obvious lies for what they are.

My final message to the misguided souls above is:

1- COMMUNICATION IS THE UNIVERSAL SOLVENT. If you have an issue with me, use private DIALOGUE to sort it out. Those who keep complaining about me, have never sent me an email, (except for one sending them to dozens of people and using it for 3P). Dialogue means: Two way communication of a private nature, not an endless stream of attacks and bait and switch or sending dozens of people emails on a private matter or spreading 3P or hatred as widely as possible. Otherwise, all you do is demonstrate, out-TRs of your own.

2- Be compassionate: I am compassionate, even toward those who have spread the most horrific and heinous of lies toward me, recognizing they each were dramatizing an unhandled area of their case and were the product of reckless and incompetent auditing, and therefore in great need of help.

3- Realize that the more of what you view as harmful lies against me and my family you publicly state, the worse you end up looking in the eyes of over 97% of people. You actually end up damaging the repute of the Church (if you defend the Church) or the Freezone/Independents. You end up promoting me. I therefore thank you for increasing my popularity and my business, though, you may be unworthy of my gratitude.

4- Stop committing continuous PT Overts or you will end up worse than a pebble on a beach. Beware: this could start as early as next lifetime! You seem to have no idea whatsoever of what is addressed in OT X-XV and what you are making up your future to be. Are you truly certain of what to expect in the after-life? I know what to expect, I have been there after two near-death experiences at Flag.

Ignore my advice at your own peril If your intent is truly to harm me, then be prepared to eventually reach that unpleasant tone level called: TOTAL FAILURE.

Pierre Ethier

Ls Rundowns – Vital Information

There is a lot of false data on the Ls and their delivery in the “Independent” field. This comes exclusively from untrained and unqualified auditors doing these rundowns using altered, forged and/or stolen materials, in addition to the fact they have over 50% missing. I tried to train a few people to deliver those rundowns, and tried, only for a short while to supervise their auditing. I divorced myself from each of those people, as soon as I realized they had betrayed my trust by mis-auditing those rundowns, refusing to do standard setups, getting repeated FLUNKS and being adamant they made no errors and refusing correction. There are 6 pending retrain orders among those people (all involving goofs at lower levels) that are still not complied with, because they each admitted, it would be detrimental to their income. Each of them provided me with criminal exchange.

I later found out that each of them had been guilty of false auditor reports. I have not been C/Sing any auditors on the Ls for many  years now. However, according to their dissatisfied pcs who keep coming forward, many claims were made that I was C/Sing their case when I wasn’t.

No need to name names as there are no exceptions as it applies to the Ls. My message to those individuals is: Shame on you, for spending much time promoting yourself on the Internet, while you ignore vital retrain orders and keep making the same mistakes. You need some ethics help first, per LRH, retraining or studying over personal unhandled out-ethics will result in no change and making the same flubs. Fortunately there are many Independents who state they offer Ethics Handlings.

The Ls rundowns based on thousands of cases seen by myself and those I have audited and information by Flag LRH trained Class XII C/Ses:

1- should be audited INTENSELY, meaning one session day at the very minimum, unless the pc is on a persistent F/N and undesirous of more auditing for the day. Auditing Ls at one session a week is a GROSS Violation of C/S Series 1 and the bulletins that explain the philosophy of those rundowns and what they seek to achieve. I have report of an auditor exactly doing that, apparently taking 6 months to a year on an L, meaning LIFE itself was the main process being run on the case, not the Ls. Seemingly those people are now happy. The question is for how long, as the C/S series clearly state that out-tech on a pc, even when the person may be rave about their attest, may be short lived or unstable, sometimes not. In each case, who can truly tell what wins the person receiving the out-tech auditing actually missed???

I have declined repeatedly to audit people on the Ls when it was impossible to deliver them intensively (meaning at least once, preferably more) those Ls either because of my schedule or the pcs. Unfortunately, less scrupulous individuals, are apparently still taking people hard earned money for that kind of delivery I repeatedly told them was wrong and out-tech. One of the auditors is a millionaire. I am not. I am not rich but I have been told that I have a heart of gold and my ultimate satisfaction it that I have helped people and did my best.

2- A plausible duration for L-11, where the pc had been honestly and fully set-up and done an in tech fashion is from a low 4 hours to a Maximum of 40 hours. Anyone run less than that (and sometimes even more) is QUICKIED. Anyone run over 40 hours was either NOT SET-UP, unnecessary optional rundowns (or those designed for another case and not the pc) were run, or there is significant OUT-TECH. By far the most likely is NOT SET-UP. If the PC is not properly set up, the PC will run then the PC will run endlessly.

Setups for the Ls are explicitly described in HCOB “Auditing and C/Sing Flag Only rundowns and a restricted checklist. The HCOB just mentioned has  NOT  been read by anyone delivering the Ls in the free field, because it is part of the Ls C/S materials only.

I have heard reports of people being run 100 hours or even 200 hours on L-11. Sometimes it comes from the pc himself, or from his/her published success story.

We have heard auditors charged for L-11  between $20,000 and $40,000 and taking in excess of 100 to 200 hours. WoW!!!  This is more than the Church charges. These poor saps have either literally money to burn or do so little research that they happily pay the Ferrari list price when buying a Geo or a Volkswagen. There were actual reports from PCs paying for a single L in excess of  $300 000. I am shocked by the arrogance of those “gold diggers”.  As to myself I have often attended the needs of dying and abandoned Scientologists at my own expense and spent countless hours assisting people.

3- A plausible duration for L-12, where the pc had been honestly and fully set-up and done an in tech fashion is from a low 10 hours to a Maximum of 50 hours. The same comments as I wrote for L-11 apply. Apparently there are people who have spent 100-200 hours on L-12, paying more than the Church own exorbitant prices. I heard of a person getting L-12 in one hour by an auditor… meaning 90% of the rundown could not have possibly been run.

4- L-10 is different than other Ls. It is a long rundown. It covers all dynamics and areas of life. A standardly run L-10 has a minimum of 2500 questions, with many others for handling items that come up. 25 hours is made of 1500 minutes. Spending only one minute per question means the auditor is zipping the rundown at supersonic speed and failing to restimulate the pc. This means the auditor has at his hands the full power of a 747 Jumbo jet and is satisfied with doing local pizza delivery and never getting off the ground.

L-10 duration can vary widely. On a non-clear, Dianetics R3r is run as part of the rundown. This can lengthen the rundown.

An badly trained auditor will often overrun handlings, since he does not have the skill to properly spot them. Instead of validating the EP of an Item when it occurs, he will run many additional (unnecessary) questions, extending unnecessary the rundown (and filling his pocket in the bargain). This can cause the earlier blown item to come back, resulting in instability or unaddressed aberration. It took months of Internships, videos and cramming accessing LRH C/Sed L-10 session to learn how to audit L-10 flublessly. Per C/S 52 and LRH conferences on the Flag Internship and on auditing the Ls, this is the only way an auditor can learn how to audit L-10 properly. Anything else is QUICKIE training and will result in Quickie L-10. This is what LRH says and my experience has shown him to be correct on that point.

Apparently some people don’t mind getting botched Ls (or out-tech/squirrel auditing). Rotten food may taste great, if you have never eaten anything but unflavoured liquid protein and vitamins, but don’t be surprised you get infected with E choli or worse…

Karen de la Carriere trained by LRH, multiple winner of the auditor of the year award at Flag and an authentic Flag Class XII C/S, has made several statements about the training and skills necessary to learns the Ls.

I agree with each of them 100%. Specifically she said:

“There is nothing in the field in current set ups that can even come near approximating Ls training. Each internship takes MONTHS of 40 hour to 60 hours in the chair of flawless VWD sessions for graduation to be approved. But the pc is the beneficiary and is now in safe hands. The safety and guaranteed stability of the pc is the primary importance here. To hell with any other consideration than the PC and the PC’s benefit.” Karen

I could not have said it better myself.

Written by Pierre Ethier

Related posts:

 WARNING

Why interships are so vital for the auditor delivering the Ls. 

Found with google search:

1994 Church of Scientology price list for services

RTC publication found on google search:

2002 Church of Scientology price list for the Ls

FUNDAMENTALISM

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII

FUNDAMENTALISM

 

A new epithet has recently emerged out the Mind of the fanatics that are violently opposed to the tenets of Standard Tech and Best Practice: FUNDAMENTALISM, when describing the technical application of auditing and Hubbard inspired counseling.

Fundamentalism is defined as religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles, and often by intolerance of other views and opposition to secularism

The fanatics behind that recurring train of thought have long preached the same thing:

1- That training and Interning is unnecessary and that one can call himself an expert without any real experience and only the most cursory of studies of the materials. Those pushing that aberrant ideology are the first to denigrate the value of training and those who dedicated decades of their lives becoming true experts and professionals: in their minds and writings they spread their false propaganda that any self-certified Class IV with a few dozen hours experience is just as good (if not even better) than a Class XII with over 40,000 hours of experience and having completed over two dozen auditor Internships under Class XII Case Supervisors that had been trained and handpicked by L. Ron Hubbard himself.

2- That there is something inherently evil in adhering with true professionalism and meticulous care to the stricts standards and discipline that both common sense and L. Ron Hubbard himself are required to deliver competently the Upper Levels and those designed to BYPASS THE NORMAL SELF-PROTECTION MECHANISM OF THE HUMAN MIND

3- That wild and new ideas not based on a shred of scientific evidence or even having proven to achieve any kind of result are as valid, if not more than long proven principles. The aberrant notion being promoted by those fanatics is that somehow, sitting in their living room, sometimes helped by generous amounts of Beer and cigarette smoke, and without a formal education in anything beyond a High School diploma nor in the Mind, Philosophy or Spirit these self-proclaimed Geniuses have been able to accomplish in a few hours and on their own  more than thousands of years of Science and more than decades of Intensive research by L. Ron Hubbard and the hundreds of people that helped him.

According to their hidden philosophical views, a failed auditor who has never been able to graduate an Internship conducted under any Case Supervisor worthy of that name, never bothered to spend any time drilling or honing his skills and who has never been able to objectively prove he can produce uniform results is on an equal footing as someone who spent hundreds (if not thousands) of hours drilling and cramming so he could audit flublessly hundreds of cases.

4- Every single vice present in their own behavior, they accuse those they chose to denigrate by mislabeling them as “fundamentalist”. They label as arrogant anyone insistent on sticking to professional standards and discipline. It never dawn on them that someone who was was too lazy to train properly, too selfish to persist in applying what has been proven by clinical tests to be “best practice” and that has never been successful in producing results consistently  suddenly claiming that he is a World Authority and therefore entitled to denigrate and ridicule the true professionals in the same filed is not only the PAROXYSM of ARROGANCE, but delusional as well.

They typically realize that by peddling auditing in the same manner of Snake Oil Merchants of old, they can maximize financial gain while minimizing the amount of effort required. Those among that group of fanatics that are not after financial wealth, are after Power over other people’s lives. Just like a perverse hypnotist who amuse himself by getting people he experiments on to act in funny ways or like animals, so are those who view people merely as guinea pigs to be experimented on. When they accuse true altruists people of delivering auditing with Professionalism and discipline of being con Men and only interested in Money, one can be certain that they are talking about themselves, a phenomenon known as Projective Identification in the Psychological Field and “similar Overts of one’s Own” in Scientology.  .

6- They normally claim to follow Standard tech. Some even redefine the word Standard (whose true meaning is a Universal yardstick) by claiming a Standard is simply following their own set of rules, that they keep inventing as they keep experimenting.  They do that because most people that have been exposed to Scientology and the bulk of normal people distrust non-standard application, in particular those who violate the tenets taught by L. Ron Hubbard. In the same vein. very few people that are sane of Mind, would abandon their own Minds to experimental procedures that have been just been developed on a whim. Hence the typical desire to deceive by those fanatics. claiming their wild ideas are in the same class as those of true professionals. The desire to lure clients is the true motive. They are essentially being dishonest.

7- They frequently promote aberrant and absurd notions that nobody outside the small world of the Freezone or Independent Field can agree with. Among the popular notions promoted by these individuals are the notion that some of them have Psychic Powers of such Magnitude that they are able to influence World Leader or Events through their mere thoughts. Yet the same individuals fail the simplest of logical tests in life and frequently their own lives and environment are in tatters.

Another popular set of notion include variations on the theme that Aliens (often called Markabians) in remote galaxies or solar system have taken over the world of Scientology and are telepathically guiding it at a distance.

Or they can claim to be able to audit over the phone (or even through their “Superlative Telepatic abilities”) and somehow get reads transference from the pc to the E-Meter to which they have connected themselves.

While they are certainly entitled to any belief they wish to indulge themselves in, all too often, they seek to promote their ideas through the denigration of those they view as “competition”. In their eyes someone with a lot of ideas not proven by any test and having no experience with a subject has a right to demand from a professional and expert in the subject to be called Peers and equals. The response to the statement that their knowledge, experience and skills do not measure up to the proven experts in the field is normally a violent an extremely vocal rebuttal through Ad Hominem attacks and the pernicious use of “Scientology Black PR”.

Scientology Black PR is the tool used to spread lies about another whose dissenting views are perceived as a threat to one’s vested interests.

Black PR has nothing to do with truth. Only with satisfying the private interests of the one sponsoring it.

One of the key trick of Black PR is the redefinition of terms or the labeling with incorrect attributes that which one seeks to harm or destroy.

By labeling professionalism, self-discipline and adhering to the standards of Best Practice as FUNDAMENTALISTS,  the fanatic making use of the Black PR tool just mentioned seeks to aggrandize himself denigrating their opponents falsely associating the Ethical Practice of Scientology or Hubbard based counseling with a stigmatized word (normally meant to be used in a theological context, not a secular one such as auditing) and demonizing it.  Fundamentalism in most people’s Mind today has the meaning of RADICALISM or EXTREMISM, and a close association with the evils Religious Extremism has caused since 2001.

It is nothing short of a Subliminal Message designed to propagate covertly the ridiculous notion that anyone disciplined enough to stick to BEST PRACTICE anchored in proven results is in fact some sort of EXTREMIST.

My message to the purveyors of the False data that anyone sticking to the discipline, standards and Professionalism associated with Standard Tech is a FUNDAMENTALIST

is for them to :

1- GET OFF YOUR LAZY ASS and PROPERLY TRAIN so you can at least produce uniform results with a technology before you claim being such an expert in it that you can freely denigrate it.

2- STOP BEING DISHONEST by falsely labeling your ideas own ideas or those of your newly found Guru as Standard Scientology or directly from L. Ron Hubbard, when they simply are not. You certainly can believe and practice anything you want, but mislabeling is nothing but a form of parasitism seeking to leech on the proven record and hard work done by those who developed the technology or those who invested years of their lives honestly training in it. This especially applied to forged HCOBs and Rundowns created in the Freezone and misattributed to L. Ron Hubbard (like the Freezone version of SuperPower and OT 2 and OT 3 as currently taught by Ron’s Org and their followers.) It entirely applies to the concepts of Telepathic, phone and Skype auditing as they directly contravene the principles of auditing as explained in Bulletins and lectures within Scientology. and actual Videos of sessions delivered by L. Ron Hubbard.

3- STOP CLAIMING TRAINING OR STATES OF BEING NOT ATTAINED. Some people have developed the notion that studying a Class VIII course pack in a few hours and listening to the Class VIII tapes (or more often, only reading their transcripts). with scores of missing materials such as the LRH |Class VIII C/Sed sessions,  and no course supervision nor anyone to attest them makes them a FULL Class VIII on a par with those who trained and apprenticed for months on that Course. Or that you can now claim to be a Class XII auditor because you have been shown a bootleg Ls materials pack, devoid of all 50 theory HCOB covering those rundowns missing all LRH taped lectures on the subject and were taught by a provisional Class IV auditor who never trained at Flag himself. Or that having achieved an OT Level developed by someone else than LRH entitles you to be claim to be  WITHOUT A CASE, no matter how nattery, reactive, make-wrong and restimulated you have become.

If your practice is centered mainly around your alleged extraordinary Psychic skills, such as being a world Class telepath capable of counseling and altering the behavior of a world Leader, or your claim of formidable telekinesis abilities that enables you to influence the needle of your emeter by channeling a pre-clear on the other side of the world, have the Integrity of getting your claims independently verified by somebody who is credible before demanding that you automatically be given the same status as those who studied and trained for decades while having dozens of fully qualified case Supervisors attesting the auditing as competent and standard.

The aberrant notions promoted by David Miscavige are in fact the very same ideology as the one promoted by the fanatics referred to in this essay, though under a different disguise. Their results tend to be the same as well.

(c) Pierre Ethier

Complete list of all Technical Issues-1969

The following is an exhaustive and complete list of all Technical Issues published along with their status. As a rule all issues written by someone else than LRH have been cancelled, even if doing so caused knowledge or vital advice to be lost. For example: Bulletins about Triple Rudiments have never been replaced and as a result, almost every auditor in the field have been mis-running Triple or Quad Rudiments. Scores of detailed drills covering anything from Handling Audiences to auditing correctly every processes on the Grades or actual Case Remedies have been cancelled without ever being replaced.

The first year that has been compiled is the year 1969. Unless specified otheerwise, all issues are HCOBs
DATE                                    TITLE                                                           STATUS

January 05 UNRESOLVING CASES – ADDITIONAL NOTE CURRENT TECH VOLS
January 08 DRUGS AND INSANITY NON-COMPLIANCE AND ALTER-IS CURRENT TECH VOLS
January 23 THE STANDARD CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
January 24 SUB-ZEROS TRIPLE GRADES LOWER LEVELS TRIPLE GRADES OLD TECH VOLS
January 24 SUMMARY REPORT * CANCELLED
January 25 TARGETS AND COMPUTERS CURRENT TECH VOLS
January 25 TRIPLE LOWER GRADES OLD TECH VOLS
January 28 HANDLING TRIPLE * CANCELLED
January 29 TRIPLE AND EXTERIOR * CANCELLED
January 30 TRIPLE RUDIMENTS * CANCELLED
February 03 TRIPLE GRADES FLOWS CURRENT TECH VOLS
February 03 TRIPLE GRADES OLD TECH VOLS
February 07 THE BODY COMM PROCESS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY DR JARVIS AND OTTO ROOS REISSUED 1970 AS HCOB ATTRIBUTED TO LRH
February 09 Research Notes RE THE TRIPLE GRADES CURRENT TECH VOLS
February 11 USE OF TRIPLE RUDIMENTS * CANCELLED
February 12 L4A FOR ASSESSMENT OF ALL LISTING QUESTIONS SEE HCOB 15 DEC 68
February 14 CASE ENTRY – CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS * CANCELLED
February 18 STAGE PRESENCE TRAINING DRILLS – TR20 CANCELLED
February 18 STAGE PRESENCE TRAINING DRILLS – TR21 CANCELLED
February 18 STAGE PRESENCE TRAINING DRILLS – TR22 CANCELLED
February 28 MEDICAL DOCTORS CURRENT TECH VOLS
March 03 CASE GAIN COMPLETING LEVELS CURRENT TECH VOLS
March 12 AUDITOR’S REPORT TRIPLE GRADES OLD TECH VOLS
March 12 PHYSICALLY ILL PCS AND PRE OTS CURRENT TECH VOLS
March 14 IT IS OK FOR ANY CLASS VIII * CANCELLED
March 17 POLITICS CURRENT TECH VOLS
March 17 Summary Report Form Auditor Admin Series 12RA CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 02 DIANETIC ASSISTS CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 05 NEW PRECLEARS The Workability of Scientology CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 06 DIANETICS COURSE AUDITING REQUIREMENTS CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 06 FUNDAMENTAL AUDITING CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 11 DIANETIC HEALTH FORM OLD TECH VOLS
April 11 TRIPLE RUDIMENTS * CANCELLED
April 15 PTP RUDIMENT CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
April 16 HEALTH FORM, USE OF OLD TECH VOLS
April 17 DIANETIC CASE FAILURES CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 17 DIANETIC CASE SUPERVISION CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 22 DIANETICS vs SCIENTOLOGY CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 22 SOMATICS AND OTS CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 23 DIANETICS BASIC DEFINITIONS CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 23 DIANETICS ERASURE HOW TO ATTAIN OLD TECH VOLS
April 23 PAST LIVES CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 23 BASIC DEFINITIONS CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 24 DIANETIC RESULTS CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 24 DIANETIC USE CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 24 PRECLEAR ASSESMENT SHEET OLD TECH VOLS
April 26 BAD INDICATORS CANCELLED
April 26 SOMATICS CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 27 DIANETIC FAILURES CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 27 R-3-R Restated COMMANDS ON SECOND RUN ON AN INCIDENT OLD TECH VOLS
April 28 HIGH TA IN DIANETICS CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 29 ASSESSMENT AND INTEREST CURRENT TECH VOLS
April 30 AUDITOR TRUST CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 01 GRINDING OUT ENGRAMS CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 04 DIANETICS MAJOR AUDITING FAULTS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
May 05 TOUCH ASSISTS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
May 06 DIANETICS AND REVIEW CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
May 06 ROUTINE 3-R REVISED ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
May 07 DIANETIC COURSE STUDY DRILLS * CANCELLED
May 07 DIANETICS EXTRACTS FROM EARLY BULLETINS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
May 07 FLOATING NEEDLE CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 07 SUMMARY OF HOW TO WRITE AN AUDITOR’S REPORT, W/S… CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 07 THE FIVE GAEs CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 08 IMPORTANT STUDY DATA CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 08 REPETITIVE STUDY CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE
May 08 TEACHING THE DIANETICS COURSE CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 09 CASE SUPERVISING (New Era) DIANETICS FOLDERS CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 09 CASE SUPERVISOR FORMS OLD TECH VOLS
May 09 SUPERVISION DRILLS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE
May 11 FORCING A PC CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 11 METER TRIM CHECK CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 13 PECULIARITIES CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 14 CULTURAL LAG CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 14 DIANETIC ASSISTS OLD TECH VOLS
May 14 FN AND ERASURE OLD TECH VOLS
May 14 SICKNESS CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 15 DIRTY NEEDLE CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 17 TRS AND DIRTY NEEDLES CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 18 ERASURE CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 19 DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES PRIOR ASSESSING CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 19 HEALTH FORM, USE OF A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF AUDITING OLD TECH VOLS
May 19 PASTORAL COUNSELLING HEALTH FORM OLD TECH VOLS
May 19 DRUG AND ALCOHOL CASES PRIOR ASSESSING OLD TECH VOLS
May 20 DIANETICS COURSE DATA OLD TECH VOLS
May 20 KEEPING DIANETICS WORKING IN AN AREA CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 21 ASSESSMENT CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 22 DIANETICS ITS BACKGROUND CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 22 NOTES ON CS INSTRUCTIONS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
May 23 AUDITING OUT SESSIONS NARRATIVE VERSUS SOMATIC CHAINS CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 24 DIANETIC HIGH CRIMES CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 24 THE DIFFICULT CASE CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 25 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT OLD TECH VOLS
May 26 DIANETICS STUDY AND DRILLS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
May 27 EARLIER SIMILAR * CANCELLED
May 27 THE VIII’s NIGHTMARE CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 28 DIANETICS AND RESULTS DIANETIC COUNSELING GROUPS CURRENT TECH VOLS
May 28 HOW NOT TO ERASE CURRENT TECH VOLS
June 03 TR NOTES CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
June 04 COMM IMPEDIMENTS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
June 05 TWO DIANETIC REMEDIES CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
June 06 CRAMMING CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
June 06 PREDICTION AND CONSEQUENCES CURRENT TECH VOLS
June 07 DIANETICS POINTS WHICH GO OUT AND WRECK PCs CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
June 07 HOW TO MAKE A PERSON SOBER CURRENT TECH VOLS
June 10 LANGUAGE DICTIONARIES AND TRANSLATIONS CANCELLED J.EGGERS CL VIII
June 11 MATERIALS, SCARCITY OF CURRENT TECH VOLS
June 12 7 CASES R3R SET UP CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
June 13 THE 3 WAY S and D CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
June 19 DEFINITION OF TERMS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE
June 23 FN OLD TECH VOLS
June 26 CLASS VIII PRE-AUDITING REQUIREMENTS. * CANCELLED
June 26 C/S—How to Case Supervise Dianetics Folders ** CANCELLED
June 26 ENGRAMS, HANDLING OF AND OTs ** CANCELLED
June 27 Q and A CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
June 28 HOW TO CASE SUPERVISE DIANETICS FOLDERS CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 01 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 03 HEALTH FORM AND SOMATICS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
July 04 AUDITING OF OT III PRECLEARS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 04 DIANETICS STUDENT AUDITORS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 05 Q and A CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
July 10 STENOGRAPHIC AUDITING CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 10 EXTERIORIZATION REMEDY CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 10 FORMER THERAPIES AND EARLIER PRACTICES * CANCELLED
July 11 SUPERVISION CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 12 AMENDMENT TO 5 JUNE 1969, TWO DIANETIC REMEDIES CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 12 EXTERIORIZATION CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 12 STARTING DIANETICS ON PCS WHO HAVE HAD SCIENTOLOGY AUDITING CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 12 THE PC WHO HAS SOMETHING THAT HASN’T BEEN HANDLED CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 16 URGENT IMPORTANT FAILED SESSIONS CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 17 FLAGRANT AUDITING ERRORS CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 17 AMENDMENT AND ADD. TO CLASS VIII CS BULLETIN OF 10 DEC 1968 CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 17 (NEW ERA) DIANETIC COMMAND TRAINING DRILLS TR 101 AND 102 CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 18 DIANETICS AND VIII CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY OTTO ROOS
July 19 AUDITING PRE-OTS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 19 DIANETICS AND ILLNESS CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 21 ONE-HAND ELECTRODES CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 21 R6-EW ** CONFIDENTIAL R6EW ONLY
July 22 AUDITING SPEED CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 22 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT OLD TECH VOLS
July 22 PASTORAL COUNSELLING HEALTH FORM OLD TECH VOLS
July 22 UNFLAT CHAINS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
July 22 AUDITING SPEED OLD TECH VOLS
July 23 AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT PLICIES CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 23 HIGH TA ASSESSMENT AUDITING SPEED OLD TECH VOLS
July 24 SERIOUSLY ILL PCS CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 26 BODY AND STANDARD * CANCELLED
July 27 BPL WHAT IS A CHECKSHEET BPL
July 27 ANTIBIOTICS OLD TECH VOLS
July 27 HIGH TA AND ERASING * CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY PEACHES POOK
July 29 THE ART OF CASE SUPERVISION CURRENT TECH VOLS
July 30 STUDENT PROGRESS BOARD CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE
August 02 LX LISTS CURRENT TECH VOLS
August 03 LX2 EMOTIONAL ASSESSMENT LIST CURRENT TECH VOLS
August 04 LX3 OLD TECH VOLS
August 09 CASE FOLDER ANALYSIS, DIANETICS OLD TECH VOLS
August 09 LX1 (Conditions) CURRENT TECH VOLS
August 09 CASE FOLDER ANALYSIS, (NEW ERA) DIANETICS CURRENT TECH VOLS
August 12 DIANETIC CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
August 12 HANDWRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS – OT III CONFIDENTIAL OT III
August 12 CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS CONFIDENTIAL CL VIII ONLY
August 12 CONFIDENTIAL – CASE SUPERVISOR ACTIONS CONFIDENTIAL CL VIII OT III
August 15 FLYING RUDS CURRENT TECH VOLS
August 16 HANDLING ILLNESS IN SCIENTOLOGY CURRENT TECH VOLS
August 21 TR 104 NOTE CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY TONY DUNLEAVY TRAINING AIDE
August 25 CONFIDENTIAL – ADD OT III CS OT III
August 25 DEFINITION OF ARCU CDEI * CANCELLED
August 26 FAILED OT CASES CONFIDENTIAL CLASS VIII
August 26 CONFIDENTIAL – OT III CASE SUPERVISION OT III
September 02 CANC OF BULLS 22 May 69 CS INSTR, 27 JUN 69 Q AND A CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
September 02 DIANETICS THE E-METER DEFINED CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BRIAN LIVINGSTON CLASS XII
September 14 LEARNING PROCESSES EDUCATION BY DUPL AND REPETITION CANCELLED EXERPTED FROM 15ACC
September 14 LEARNING PROCESSES EDUCATION BY EVAL OF IMPORTANCE CANCELLED EXERPTED FROM 15ACC
September 14 LEARNING PROCESSES GROUP TEACHING BY DEF AGREEMENT CANCELLED EXERPTED FROM 15ACC
September 18 DIANETICS AUDITING AND OT III CONFIDENTIAL OT III
September 19 STUDY SLOWNESS CURRENT TECH VOLS
October 01 CONFIDENTIAL – OT VIII CONFIDENTIAL CL VIII
October 03 DIANETIC REMEDIES CANCELLED WRITTEN BY BELKACEM FERRADJ CS-5
October 03 URGENT – IMPORTANT LX 3 HANDLING OF * CANCELLED
October 05 DIANETIC TRIPLES OLD TECH VOLS
October 05 TRIPLE FLOWS CURRENT TECH VOLS
October 05 UNRESOLVING CASES OLD TECH VOLS
October 06 TRIPLE ERRORS IN DIANETICS OLD TECH VOLS
October 07 CONFIDENTIAL (OT III and above only) ** OT III
October 08 CONFIDENTIAL – OT III REMEDIES (OT III and above only) ** OT III
October 12 CONFIDENTIAL – SECRET – LDN OT III OT III
October 12 DIANETIC TRIPLES PLURAL ITEM CURRENT TECH VOLS
October 12 FORCING A PC OLD TECH VOLS
October 13 CLEARING COURSE CHARGE CONFIDENTIAL CLEARING COURSE ONLY
October 13 CONFIDENTIAL – OT III ERRORS CONFIDENTIAL OT III
October 17 DRUGS, ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS CURRENT TECH VOLS
October 25 CONFIDENTIAL – SECRET – OT III ONLY CONFIDENTIAL OT III
November 05 FOLDER SUMMARY CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BELKACEM FERRADJ CS-5
November 05 GF TO FN * CANCELLED
November 05 LX 3 (ATTITUDES) CURRENT TECH VOLS
November 05 RE PREPCHECKS * CANCELLED
November 14 Medical Charts FO 2187 ISSUED AS HCOB IN 1991
November 15 CASE SUPERVISION AUDITING AND RESULTS CURRENT TECH VOLS
November 15 CASE SUPERVISION, HOW IT GOES NON-STANDARD CURRENT TECH VOLS
November 19 GF40 OUT OF VALENCE CASE CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY BELKACEM FERRADJ CS-5
November 20 SOME WORD DEFINITIONS FOR STUDENTS USE CANCELLED – WRITTEN BY MARY ROBINSON
November 23 STUDENT RESCUE INTENSIVE CURRENT TECH VOLS
December 02 RISING TA CURRENT TECH VOLS

Keep Scientology Working (KSW)

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII-Auditor

HOW TO KEEP SCIENTOLOGY FROM WORKING:

ABANDON ANY PART OF ITS TECHNOLOGY THAT CONFLICTS WITH PRIVATE INTERESTS OF ITS PRINCIPALS

People who have been running Scientology have not always had the most Ethical of Intentions. In fact, those running it for the last three decades have had intentions that have nothing to do with the improvement of people or their reaching true enlightenment.

It is common place among the criminal to accuse others of what they are themselves doing and therefore hide (they think) their true misdeeds by labeling them as being the opposite of what they truly are.

THE HIDDEN OBJECTIVES OF THE GOLDEN AGE OF TECH

The Golden Age of Tech is yet another example. it should have been called the Age of Darkness.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of the Golden Age of Tech is to “wipe clean the slate of auditors” by cancelling any certificate ever obtained (even under L. Ron Hubbard himself) and ordering them to lengthy retrains where auditors will be re-educated in the application of auditing.

Compare it to the following definition:

A systematic effort to eliminate an individual’s former loyalties and beliefs and to substitute them for a new ideology. It is best achieved by isolating and/or disconnecting from any anyone with divergent ideas, the insistence on exacting regimens that are not to be challenged or questioned, strong social pressures and rewards for cooperation; physical and psychological punishments for noncooperation, including social ostracism and criticism, deprivation of food, sleep, and social contacts, bondage, and torture; and constant reinforcement.

The above is the DEFINITION OF BRAINWASHING!

 SECONDARY OBJECTIVE

The secondary objective of the Golden Age of Tech is to implant the unimpeachable datum that RTC is infallible in technical matters and that any technical edict it issues should never be questioned, under penalty of excommunication and eternal damnation.  This will prove vital in getting all auditors under the control of the Church to blindly accept radical transformations in definitions and the technology without even needing to publish new bulletins,and accepting any verbal Tech issued by RTC as “undisputable truth”.

Thus we have the definition of a Floating Needle being perverted and causing thousands of unnecessary overruns.

This we have the Fabulous Ls Rundowns have been completely transmogrified and now being run according to lower level styles and techniques instead of their own unique ones, and over 50% of recipients at Flag being greatly unhappy (or worse) with them.

Thus we have the invention of the datum that people auditing on Solo NOTs must learn “How to Kill and F/N” and disavow their wins in order to benefit the Church through statistics and/or income.

Thus we have people being audited for hours over ARCXs with the auditor purposefully ignoring them because of some arbitrary or false datum he has been indoctrinated in.

TERTIARY OBJECTIVE

The tertiary objective of the Golden Age of tech are 1- to remove any call to judgment or understanding by auditors and replace it with inflexible rules and robotic protocols.

QUARTERNARY OBJECTIVE

The quaternary objective is the adoption of the false datum that any auditor or Case Supervisor applying fanatically the Golden Age of tech procedures can not possibly err. The corollary of that false axiom is that any and all complaints or disagreements about the programming, auditing or C/Sing merely indicate undisclosed misdeeds by the complainant(s).

Since the creation of the Golden Age of Tech, over half of the Solo NOTS completion have either openly defected or quietly departed from the Church. and nearly as many OT VIIIs. Church membership has dwindled by 60%. LRH repute has been torn to shred in the Media and on Internet and the Church under its current leadership has done nothing whatsoever to stop that trend, but only preoccupying itself at “defending David Miscavige” whenever he was justly attacked and criticized for his crimes.

HOW RTC HAS CORRUPTED THE TECH AND BETRAYED SCIENTOLOGY

When the Golden Age of tech was announced in 1996, the “Discovery” by David Miscavige was that the “Blind had been leading the Blind”. Nothing was said about the inescapable facts that

1- RTC by definition was the one leading on technical matters, and therefore being “The Blind”

2- Being Blind in that context (having low perception) is entirely the product of hidden misdeeds and contra-survival acts.

3- Therefore, announcing that RTC was entirely responsible for the Technology being applied the way it was (wrongly), Scientology public were expected to continue to blindly trust the same group of thugs that David Miscavige was broadcasting as having betrayed its public.

THE 10 COMMANDMENTS ACCORDING TO RTC

Since the Advent of RTC, in the 1980s, the Church of Scientology has completely failed in its mission of “Keep Scientology Working”. It has focused almost exclusively at controlling people, typically through Terror and the destruction of anyone who “had other Fish to fry” (an expression that has come to mean doing or thinking anything that is not written in the new Tables of the Law written by RTC.  The Laws being:

1- Thou shalt not question nor doubt any rule or order issued by or on behalf or RTC, no matter how off-policy or destructive it may seem to be.

2- Thou shalt submit all of your dynamics under the control and orders of the Church and accept all directives to suppress one or more dynamics, including Divorce, Abortion or Disconnection without challenge or disobedience.

3- Thou shalt lie and deceive even under oath, if it benefit the Church without feeling there is the slightest wrong in doing so.

4- Thou shalt not save any money for yourself, your future or your children, but donate without examination everything you own to the Church. You will get into debt without any limitation as long as you keep being ordered to do so by a Church official.

5- Thou shall disconnect as destructively as possible from anyone who disagrees with the Church, the way it is being run or who criticizes any of its principals.

6- Thou shalt refuse to listen to any communication or examine any data that seek to prove or explain how you may have been lied to by the Church, declaring that anything unflattering about the Church or its principals is by definition entheta and a lie.

7- Thou shalt accept any orders to apply Scientology, its Tech or its Admin differently than you have learned if RTC orders it as they know better than anyone else.

8- Disavow or disconnect from your Father and Mother, sisters and brothers, spouse or children whenever  it is ordered to by an Ethics Officer.

9- Never doubt anything you are told at any Church Briefing or official publication, nor  ever try to confirm their accuracy. Use the Internet solely for purposes immediately related to your job and refuse to read anything about Scientology, the Church or any of its principals, as the Church of Scientology never lies to its members.

10- Only follow goals of yours that are directly and explicitly approved by the Church. Change your goals, the instant you are told by an Ethics Officer or other authorized Church personnel that they are wrong. Disregard the Code of Honor. It is only written for PR purposes.

STEP 0 OF KSW

Over the course of years an additional step has surreptitiously been added  to the 10 points of KSW:

Step 0 of KSW: Abandon the Technology, or least the bits that those in charge want discarded  to satisfy their political or financial interests. Hundreds of good Bulletins have been cancelled and never been replaced. Thousands of mental or spiritual breakthroughs been ignored or suppressed and parts of the technology developed by L. Ron Hubbard been kept indefinitely storage, in order to maximize financial gain by the Church of Scientology.

The following links show by year an exhaustive and complete list of all Technical Issues published along with their current status (where they can be found, of if cancelled or suppressed).

As a rule all issues written by someone else than LRH have been cancelled, even if doing so caused knowledge or vital advice to be lost. For example: Bulletins about Triple Rudiments have never been replaced and as a result, almost every auditor in the field have been mis-running Triple or Quad Rudiments using wrong or out-tech commands.

Scores of detailed drills covering anything from Handling Audiences to auditing correctly every processes on the Grades or actual Case Remedies have been cancelled without ever being replaced.

LIES IN THE PROMOTION OF THE GOLDEN AGE OF TECH

Decades after the wholesale cancellation of hundreds of Drills, an Impostor, who is also a failed auditor and an acknowledged NO CASE GAIN and who shows NO CHANGE as a down stat administrator created something he calls the GOLDEN AGE OF TECH, largely plagiarizing earlier cancelled bulletins that were written by Class XIIs and other Highly trained individuals as ordered by L. Ron Hubbard. He falsely claimed authorship behind them, defaming earlier Class XIIs and Highly trained auditors who had complied with  LRH orders to create drills for every single occasion, lying in front of an audience of thousands claiming that LRH orders had never been complied with when they had.

Hundreds of bulletins gave vital technical advice and examples of application, but were cancelled without replacement nevertheless. This includes Bulletins on auditing  Autistic Children, The secret reason why OTs can cave in or act badly, dynamic assessments and many other subjects.

It is immutable policy in the Church of Scientology, to cancel every single bulletin or materials written by a person who has just fallen out of favor or been branded suppressive, even if no replacement or substation is made. As a result there are gaping holes in the training auditors and errors and mistakes that would have been easily avoided have been committed in the name of “Keep Scientology Working” when the slogan KEEP SCIENTOLOGY WORKING was merely a hypocritical front for people who had no interest in the betterment of others so that they could order the demonizing and vilifying anyone who dared disagreeing or thinking an independent unsanctioned thought.

COMPLETE OF ALL TECHNICAL ISSUES EVER PUBLISHED

Due to the large amount of work required to make such a list, it is being done,one year at a time.

The first year that has been compiled is the year 1969.

COMPLETE OF ALL TAPED LECTURES EVER PUBLISHED

In 1976 a FLAG TAPE MASTER LIST was compiled and issued. It had a few omission, but was by far the most complete list ever published by the Church.

In the 1990s, the late Ken Ogger who gave himself for nickname “THE PILOT” published the most exhaustive list of LRH conferences ever made and sought to correct and add to it.

Using my own unique background as a Class XII and Sea Org Member on Tech lines at Flag for nearly 20 years and numerous contacts and sources of help, I have filled the holes in the Pilot lists and explained the current status of each lecture.

Since the advent of the Golden Age of Tech a number of lectures have been quietly buried and the very name and existence of those conferences been erased from scientology official teaching. The Church current position is that those lectures never existed, even though they exit in previous compilations. The Church has ordered destruction of those conferences by any of the faithful who still happen to own one.

For the year 1969 the Golden Age of Knowledge states that “No LRH lecture exists”, yet I was able to confirm by title and date 13 LRH lectures made that year.

Suppressive Groups

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII-Auditor

WHO OR WHAT IS A SUPPRESSIVE GROUP?

ARE SPLINTER OR DIVERGENT GROUPS TRULY SUPPRESSIVE?

DEFINITION

L. Ron Hubbard originally defined the concept of Suppressive Groups in a Policy Letter dated 29 June 1968 (Enrollment in Suppressive Groups).

He stated “SUPPRESSIVE GROUPS, are defined as those which seek to destroy Scientology or which specialize in injuring or killing persons or damaging their cases or which advocate the suppression of mankind”.

However, in actual practice, the Church of Scientology (and Hubbard himself for that matter), has branded as Suppressives anyone who started a splinter or divergent group.

THE TRUTH:

WHAT TRULY CAUSES A GROUP TO BE BRANDED SUPPRESSIVE

 

By actual record, the Church of Scientology declares as Suppressive:

1- Any splinter group, whatever were their motives or activities.

2- Any whistleblower or group denouncing illegal acts performed or ordered by the Church of Scientology or any of its principals.

3- Anyone refusing to comply with orders issued by the Church Elite, no matter how much these may contravene approved policy or the published aims of Scientology.

4- Anyone found to be applying Scientology, or a derivative of it without the official approval or without the paying of tithes to the Church of Scientology. Contrarily to any mainstream Church, unqualified and untrained people will make the assessment of such activities and uniformly find them to be bad and harmful without any real investigation or competence to do so..

5- Any organization whose principals are known by the Church of Scientology to be former members and that teaches anything of a mental, Spiritual or Religious nature, even when it has no real connection with Scientology nor seeks to compete with it.

6- Any group or Association that has copied ideas found in Scientology or L. Ron Hubbard writings and seek to apply them, without the official approval of the Church of Scientology and the payment of large amounts of royalties. This especially applies to any new Churches created in accordance with the laws of the land.

7- Any group of  individuals that seeks to challenge the activities of the Church of Scientology or its leaders, even when invoking the writings of L. Ron Hubbard and the original materials written by Hubbard in the 1950s, which the current Church of Scientology is very fond of calling scriptures.

A exhaustive and impartial analysis of top 50 splinter or dissenting group from the Church of Scientology reveals the following facts:

THE FACTS:

THE TRUE ATTRIBUTES OF SPLINTER OR DIVERGENT GROUPS

 

1- Each and every Splinter/Divergent group purported and sought to promote the ideas contained in Scientology and consistent with its philosophy. This includes the entirety of what is labeled as “FREEZONE” or Independent Field. Therefore far from suppressing Scientology, they uniformly tried to promote it. FACT: Splinter/Divergent Groups do not seek to suppress Scientology.

2- People who have claimed that a splinter Group or FREEZONE/Independent caused someone’s actual injury or Death are very few in number (less than 3%) and every instance dates from the 1990s or the 21st Century as a small clique of particularly unethical, poorly trained and ignorant individuals started to rule or influence the key factions of the Freezone/Independent Field . The majority of the assertions of actual harm or death in the Freezone/Independent Field are anonymously made and easily traceable to the Church of Scientology or its agents. Since the Church of Scientology is among the most DEAD-AGENTED organization on the planet (except in the blind eyes of its fanatical promoters and OSA agents/collaborators), the validity of those claims is very easy to dispute.

On the other hand, the number of people documented with claims that the Church of Scientology has caused injury or contributed directly to the death of people is in the high Hundreds, or perhaps in the thousands. All one has to do is use the Internet Search Engine or visit the detailed files contained thousands of different accounts, testimonies and News media stories in the Internet web sites that are dedicated to the denunciation of abuses by the Church of Scientology.

1001- TH WAY TO DIE

A statistical analysis and study of OTs remaining faithful to the Church reveal a truly scary trend: Life expectancy for them is a mere 57 years of age: that is 20 to 25 years below the national average for all but the poorest and under-developped countries on Earth. Active membership and participation in the Church of Scientology current activities ought to be labeled: “the 1001th way to die“.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000_Ways_to_Die

Therefore, even giving reports exclusively written for the benefit of the Church of Scientology credibility, the ratio of people allegedly injured or killed by the Church of Scientology outnumbers the Splinter Groups/Freezone/Independents by over 300 to 1.

FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever specialized in injuring or Killing persons.

3- As far as advocating the Suppression of Mankind, there is no evidence that any of the 500 groups listed on any list of Splinter or Divergent groups has ever advocated or encouraged such acts. On the other hand, the Church of Scientology has regularily promoted ideas described in the “ten stages of genocide” and frequently advocated that people be deprived or liberty or their Human rights should they happen to be blacklisted for whatever reason.

FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever advocated the Suppression of Mankind.

DO FREEZONE/INDEPENDENTS GROUPS TRULY HARM CASES?

4- While the results achieved by Splinter groups and Freezone factions tend to vary according to ideas and quality in their application, only a small handful of Independent practitioners (less than 5% – none of them being member of an organized group) has shown that they may be possibly labeled as “harmful”. Even that claim is in dispute.

The matter of damaging people’s cases is largely a subjective one.

What of the auditor who falsely validates the hallucinatory claims of a pc to please him/her? Is he truly damaging the case of the person?

What of the auditor who validates the pc who is convinced that he audits remotely and telepathically the world leaders, including President Obama?

Or how about the one who believes he/she gets daily instructions from the spiritual plane where LRH gives them daily advice on where to purchase anything from picnic foam plates to a large Plasma TV?

What of people attesting to OT8, OT48 or even  OT 1008?

Most of these people claim to be happy, though many of their peers tend to view them as delusional.

For each person pointing them up as “damaged cases”, there will be those who promote them as exemplary cases.

Merely making people happy with their state of case is a questionable criteria. A number of cases, by actual record, incompetently audited people can turn on some form of Psychosis and Deep Hatred after having been audited as a victim, when they were actually a chronic aggressor and abuser of the rights of others. If one was to audit an “Hitler type” personality, the latter may enjoy his newly gained abilities as a wonderful tool for more effectively committing genocide or  spread his hatred against those he feel should be destroyed.

PREVIOUSLY DAMAGED CASES

Lastly, of supreme, but often neglected importance is whether the person’s case was already damaged by the Church of Scientology or its predecessors in the field of Mental and Spiritual practices.

In the vast majority of cases, it is simply impossible to ascertain. The Church of Scientology, typically blames its failed cases on Psychiatry and often invents newly discovered psychiatry related links to rationalize even the most justified of attacks on them.

Every case that has openly testified against a Freezone or Independent auditor for being abused, misaudited or otherwise mishandled, had done the exact same thing toward the Church of Scientology a number of years earlier.

Policies on Sources of Troubles written by L. Ron Hubbard describes responsible-for-condition cases as those insisting things such as some auditor or thing being “wholly responsible for the terrible condition I am in.” the same policy states that a “review of these cases show that they were in the same or worse condition long before auditing… and that their antagonism extends to anyone who seeks to help them”.

FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever specialized in Damaging Cases. Damaged cases are nearly always attributable to many causes and the evidence supports that the Church of Scientology does far more toward Damaging people’s cases than any Splinter/Divergent group ever has.

HOW TO DETERMINE IF A PRACTICE IS DAMAGING TO A CASE

The correct method of determining if someone’s case has been harmed by a practice is to confine oneself to the actions of the person (something that can be impartially examined) rather than the person feelings, beliefs or alleged character (something largely subjective)

The following questions should be examined and answered based on honest and thorough examination, while brushing away any and all bias and rumors:

1- Is the individual, according to the world at large, as opposed  to groups he/she is associated with (due to the likelihood of mutual out-rudiments) becoming a better person? By better person is meant someone who help others and who behave in accordance to a Moral Code such as the one written in the Way to Happiness. Because delusional or unethical individuals tend to PR themselves an actual thorough and independent examination of their activities is required.

2- Is the person more successful along their dynamics? (especially the first three)

3- What is the level of Communication of the person? Is it highly destructive toward selected individuals or are they focusing on constructive activities

4- Is the person a PR artist?

5- Are the friends or associates of the individual people of Good-Will, (even if they may have made mistakes), or people actually involved in, actually PR artists and/or con men due to their destructive activities? Who are their friends? Who are their enemies?

6- Are they hypocritically posing as “Free Independent” while covertly acting as Informant for the Church of Scientology (the one organization who has publicly vowed at trying to destroy all Independent Scientologist and practitioners). Are their enemies the same as the Church of Scientology?

LAW OF EXCLUDED MIDDLE

“THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY IS MY FRIEND”

 

Logic, in spite of the existence of the Data Series, is something largely unknown to Scientologists. The data Series written by L. Ron Hubbard were meant to complement the fundamentals of LOGIC. But most Scientologist (both within the Church and without) view it as a replacement, therefore they tend to act in a completely illogical manner.

Normal and ethical people often state that “The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend”.

Many people who have been indoctrinated by some of the false ideas taught within the Church of Scientology tend to stick to those false ideas long after they have left or even publicly disavowed any beliefs in that organization or even its philosophy and original ideas.

It is a typically action by the same kind of people to willy-nilly provide assistance to the Church of Scientology when it seeks to malign its enemies, by providing all manner of Black PR and lies against their common enemies.

In most cases, the providing of Black PR against their perceived or imaginary enemies, in forums carefully chosen because OSA and Church agents are known to frequent them is meticulously calculated to harm its target by teh typical weapons of choice of the coward: Lies, Blackmail and defamation.

The result, uncomforted by those who have a low ability to confront Evil or Reality, is that the individuals publicly attacking the Church of Scientology Enemies by using defamation, Blackmail and lies, have become de facto collaborators of the Church of Scientology and are treated as informants and reliable sources by that organization.

The net result is to weaken the target of their hatred (often an individual with limited resources or time to defend himself) and  strengthen the Church of Scientology (an organization documented to allocate unlimited resources toward the suppression of its enemies).

The only possible conclusion is that the individuals claiming to be enemies of the Church, yet actively aid the Church in its attacks of its enemies are either incredibly stupid, hypocritical or an unholy mixture of both.

Many of the EX-Scientologist boards starting with their owners and moderators act that way. The same goes with a number of Freezone/Independent Boards, in particular those controlled by the self appointed Freezone PRs, who know very well their board is infested by OSA agents and operatives, though they profess otherwise.

The only reason a board like ESMB has been allowed to continue to exist, in spite of it numerous violations of the law, and the vast resources and connections of the Church of Scientology (and its ability to get it shut it down any day it chooses to), is that it is viewed by OSA as an invaluable tool to malign its enemies and the eagerness of those who portray themselves as Victims of Scientology to do its own dirty work. And they do it for free!

Such Church allies can be created by incompetent or reckless Freezone/Independent auditors when they bypass the case of their pc and allow them to remain stuck in earlier bad and/or traumatic experiences at the hands of the Church of Scientology, yet attempt to audit them on Upper Levels or Rundowns. The resulting Blind fury or Hatred is typically targeted at anyone who may point out, especially correctly, the technical shortcomings of their auditor (the one largely responsible for restimulating the person).

THE LIST OF ENEMIES AND SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS/GROUPS

SOED Flag ED 2830RB published on the 25 July 1992 is the last list of Suppressives published by the Church of Scientology. It proved to be such an embarrassment when it was leaked on the Internet, that the Church amended its policy of updating it and has since kept its ever-growing list of Declared Suppressive Persons, a secret.

All one has to do is look at the historical records of the history and development of Scientology or the names of LRH former close associates and confidantes to recognize a veritable “Who is Who” of the History of Scientology in that issue alone.

The Church of Scientology use blind zealots, fanatics and extremists such as those dedicating themselves at making Hatred web pages on imaginary enemies of the Church of Scientology, those stalking defectors to harass them and those who believe that spying on people of good-will to satisfy the pernicious agenda of OSA. The common denominator of all these people is a deep fear of the light of Truth and the exposing of their own crimes, lies and atrocities. That terror dominates their should so much that they become unable to recognize as an OUTPOINT (or illogic) the simple fact that anyone who sees 90% of one their former associates or comrades has all the attributes Paranoia. Paranoia is a condition largely created by having committed earlier a large number of harmful acts.

To summarize:

Labelling Splinter or Divergent Groups as Suppressive is based on lies and used as an expedient to rationalize the blatant disregard by the Church of Scientology for people rights to practice their own religion as they see fit or express their opinion.

True Suppressive Groups obviously do exist: The Nazis, Organized Crime, Al-Qaeda are a few of them, but they are never listed by the Church of Scientology in the lists of Enemies of Mankind, while their own defectors always are.

Declaring Splinter or Divergent groups as Suppressives is an entirely political tool whose main aim is to stamp out competition. Further it attempts to  maintain what is advertised as “the only road to Spiritual Freedom” and Spiritual redemption for Man as a Monopoly in the hands of a self-appointed Elite. That latter point is Ethically as reprehensible as can be, since its only possible result should it come to fruition is the Enslavement of Mankind.

Observation of the actual actions done by that Elite clearly indicates that the personal Aims of the Individuals that control that Elite have nothing to do with the purported Aims of Scientology nor its published Credo. On the contrary the aims of the Elite have mainly to do with the accumulation of wealth in the most expedient possible way (typically through the secret use of Slave labour, Sweat Shops and Intimidation) and in satisfying an insatiable thirst for Power over the souls that the Church of Scientology still controls.

The way to minimize the formation of Splinter Group is for the organization to remain open to the fruits of observation and to suggestions and to acknowledge people. Most Splinter Groups were created as a result of an unhandled upset or ARCX (Disagreement, Injustice, Invalidation). By keeping quality controls high and verifying that the proper standards and protocols are adhered to, results automatically follow and the demand for switching to wild unproven ideas will remain to a minimum. To utterly prevent the formation of Splinter or Divergent groups is simply impossible without adopting totalitarian measures and keeping a thought a police active.

If one is to be in the business of helping people achieve higher levels of self-determinism, one need to accept that fact. The Church of Scientology has become akin to a 1984 type Orwellian nightmare because it refused to understand that simple principle.

Pierre Ethier

English boxer Curtis Woodhouse turns up on the doorstep of his Twitter troll

When the light-welterweight and former Birmingham City and Hull City footballer received abusive tweets about his defeat to Shane Singleton, he took matters into his own hands.

CURTIS WOODHOUSE

When Curtis Woodhouse lost his English light-welterweight title on points to Shane Singleton on Friday night , he was branded a “disgrace” on the social networking site by ‘Jimmyob88’‏, who has reportedly been abusing Woodhouse on Twitter for months.

The boxer was so enraged with the tweets that he offered his followers a £1,000 reward if they could help him locate the culprit. Woodhouse’s growing number of Twitter followers chipped in and managed to track down his troll.

Woodhouse set off to find his troll, tweeting a photograph of the street on which Jimmyob88 lived. “Right Jimbob, I’m here,” he wrote, adding: “Someone tell me what number he lives at or do I have to knock on every door #itsshowtime.”

Realising the error of his ways, Jimmyob88 replied: “I am sorry it’s getting a bit out of hand. I am in the wrong. I accept that.” A triumphant Woodhouse went home, joking that he could have saved himself some petrol money by blocking his cowardly abuser.

Woodhouse has been hailed as a hero online, with Lennox Lewis, John Prescott and Joey Barton all offering messages of support after the story broke on Mashable. Here’s how the confrontation broke on Twitter:

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2013/mar/12/english-boxer-curtis-woodhouse-twitter-troll

Le Mystere des voix Bulgares

The voices of Bulgarian women are divine.  Bulgarian folk music stands out with incredible  vocal performances, in particular the layered, diaphonic harmonies along with an intricate multi-layering, and the timbre of the vibrato-free female Bulgarian voices. The Bulgarian folk performances preserve the unique traits of an ancient music, most notably the delivery from the diaphragm that restricted the vocal chords, enabling the production of the distinctive tones and drones beyond the traditional (read “western”) scale, as well as delivery techniques such as Melisma – the production of a single syllable of text in a range of notes or scale of quarter tones (to Western ears, a trance-like wailing reminiscent of Arabic chants or perhaps Flamenco), grace notes and trill, which punctuate the performances with a rarely experienced agility, grace and power.

ERRAND OF MERCY

 

How the Church of Scientology abandons in the hour of need, to die alone and penniless, those who are the most vulnerable and desperate.

 

Call it for what it is: Complete callousness toward the dying and depraved Indifference toward those who have “outlived their usefulness”.

Sometimes around the advent of its “Golden Age”, the Church of Scientology has implemented a policy of Denying Help and/or assistance to the dying.

In the 1980s terminally ill parishioners who had paid vast fortunes into the Church Coffers were still being given counseling (auditing), though they were made to sign waivers and releases. This is how I came to audit the late Betty Filisky (Solo NOTs Completion #1) in 1987. At age 57, she was dying of Cancer. I am authorized to state at this point that she was entirely disaffected with the Senior Management of the Church after she had seen how they had behaved like bullies and thugs toward many good meaning people, including many personal friends of L. Ron Hubbard.

The Snr C/S FSO, the late Richard Reiss, blamed her illness on her disaffection, though there are no LRH references explaining how disaffection can makes someone deadly ill. But that was the politically acceptable comment to make.

The truth is that Oppression (Suppression toward people who are denied the right to defend themselves or speak out against abuses) is one of the key things that makes people ill. There are dozens of LRH references pointing to that fact. Even common sense, when one describes the Oppression by its key attribute: Stress, agrees with this as well.

Last year three times, I was asked to come to the bed of a dying person that I had last audited between 20 and 30  years earlier, because the Church they still officially belonged to (The Church of Scientology) had callously denied them the right to receive their last rites for no better reason that they now viewed them as a potential liability and a burden. Simply stated, the Church of Scientology has the peculiar view, unique among any religious organization, I have ever heard of, that it primarily exists for its own benefit and to satisfy its private interests (and those of its leaders) well ahead of those of any of its faithfuls. In that respect, the Church of Scientology acts entirely and solely like a FOR PROFIT ORGANIZATION while using loopholes within the law to parade as a Church. The reasons for Scientology being a Church have nothing to do with its daily actions and entirely with financial and monetary gain.

Listening to nothing but my Heart, I made arrangements to fly to Europe at my own expense, as all three of the dying resided there and were broke. At least, my actions allowed three good people to die with dignity and I was able to provide some comfort for their family and survivors.

I had audited the first one of them for the last time 25 years earlier and because I had left the Church shortly after, we had never spoken since. That person had remained entirely faithful to the Church until the moment she had been ditched by the Church as a potential liability for having an inoperable tumor and “having outlived her usefulness”.

Now on her death bed and unwilling to be abandoned to her fate by the Church of Scientology who viewed her as nothing more than a useless rotting piece of meat: a carcass to be, she asked for her relatives to find the person who had always been there for her when we both were at Flag and been vastly more successful than anyone else in helping her through auditing. That person was me.

She was extremely glad to see me. Her first words were:”Pierre! you came! I am so glad! You have helped me so much…” I provided her with the help that she needed and her well deserved last rites. Within 48 hours she departed peacefully from her body after an agony that had lasted too long already.

In another country I met an elderly individual who had once been a truly brilliant executive and many decades ago a close confidante of L. Ron Hubbard, someone whose name can be heard on many LRH conferences from the 1950s. Sadly a degenerative disease had ravaged their life and body. I was able to provide effective counselling and assistance to that individual to the point that the care providers told me I had made a difference  for the better.

The third one lived in a country where Scientology is unknown.

That person was now deadly ill and no cure could be found. Years earlier, under David Miscavige guidance, teenage CMO Messengers had treated that person with wanton disrespect for his dignity as a Human being. That prompted the individual to leave.

The Church of Scientology viewed that extremely able and ethical individual as “useless” and an ENEMY, merely for the fact that he had departed the Sea Org while still following all of their rules on leaving. I was invited to deliver an Assist as the family knew I did not apply KSW (Keep Scientology Working Policies)  destructively like the Church of Scientology now specializes itself in. His influential family and the Head of State of that country both arranged for the most competent doctor they could find to help that “Enemy of the Church”. It is little wonder after the leaders of that country had been appraised of the Violation of Human rights on their own citizens by the Church of Scientology, that all Scientology books have now been officially banned from both bookstores and Libraries in that country, because they are viewed as the product of “an Extremist Organization”. I was successful in helping that individual as well.

I had very little sympathy when someone called me direct from the latest Freezone convention and boasted about awards and trophies they had just handed out to people who are top PR artists but horrible auditors when one is actually allowed to examine their session reports. Coincidentally one of the awards recipients had just abandoned a suicidal pc behind and left another go to a psychiatrist mid-intensive and put on anti-psychotics. Neither that auditor nor the Freezone Convention organizers felt the slightest guilt feeling.

I told them that I was on an errand of Mercy at my own expense because it was the right to do: to help those who gave several decades of their lives to help others and LRH develop the technology so that we can all use it, nor merely financially benefit from it, as too many people both in the Church and the Independent field seem to do. The reason I went to help those people was largely because they were too broke to pay my expenses because nobody else in the Church or the Freezone/Independent Field was willing to do it. I had spent many hours cramped in Economy Airplane seats, slept on uncomfortable couches, ate processed food because it was the only thing available, while some of those “award winners” basked in luxurious accommodations and quietly swept their overt products under the carpet.

That person I told this to, went on repeating what I had just said.  I was assigned subsequently lower conditions and told I was a “LIABILITY TO THE FREEZONE” by the self-appointed FREEZONE PR, when I declined to cover up for the auditor whose pcs became suicidal or defected to psychiatry mid intensive and for refusing to stay silent about another one who keeps being invited as guest of honor to events, but is documented to be a child molester. The self-appointed Freezone PR has declared me FAIR GAME since and encouraged both his auditor and those who finance him and pay for his own auditing to do the same.

Judging on the resulting natter, it seems that I missed a lot of withholds that day.

This is why no matter how much natter, lies, rumors and sordid tales the tormented souls whose withholds were missed that night, or other nights, I stand tall whenever I look at my actual actions and motives.

Pierre Ethier

(c) 2013

ERRAND OF MERCY

 

How the Church of Scientology abandons in the hour of need, to die alone and penniless, those who are the most vulnerable and desperate.

 

Call it for what it is: Complete callousness toward the dying and depraved Indifference toward those who have “outlived their usefulness”.

Sometimes around the advent of its “Golden Age”, the Church of Scientology has implemented a policy of Denying Help and/or assistance to the dying.

In the 1980s terminally ill parishioners who had paid vast fortunes into the Church Coffers were still being given counseling (auditing), though they were made to sign waivers and releases. This is how I came to audit the late Betty Filisky (Solo NOTs Completion #1) in 1987. At age 57, she was dying of Cancer. I am authorized to state at this point that she was entirely disaffected with the Senior Management of the Church after she had seen how they had behaved like bullies and thugs toward many good meaning people, including many personal friends of L. Ron Hubbard.

The Snr C/S FSO, the late Richard Reiss, blamed her illness on her disaffection, though there are no LRH references explaining how disaffection can makes someone deadly ill. But that was the politically acceptable comment to make.

The truth is that Oppression (Suppression toward people who are denied the right to defend themselves or speak out against abuses) is one of the key things that makes people ill. There are dozens of LRH references pointing to that fact. Even common sense, when one describes the Oppression by its key attribute: Stress, agrees with this as well.

Last year three times, I was asked to come to the bed of a dying person that I had last audited between 20 and 30  years earlier, because the Church they still officially belonged to (The Church of Scientology) had callously denied them the right to receive their last rites for no better reason that they now viewed them as a potential liability and a burden. Simply stated, the Church of Scientology has the peculiar view, unique among any religious organization, I have ever heard of, that it primarily exists for its own benefit and to satisfy its private interests (and those of its leaders) well ahead of those of any of its faithfuls. In that respect, the Church of Scientology acts entirely and solely like a FOR PROFIT ORGANIZATION while using loopholes within the law to parade as a Church. The reasons for Scientology being a Church have nothing to do with its daily actions and entirely with financial and monetary gain.

Listening to nothing but my Heart, I made arrangements to fly to Europe at my own expense, as all three of the dying resided there and were broke. At least, my actions allowed three good people to die with dignity and I was able to provide some comfort for their family and survivors.

I had audited the first one of them for the last time 25 years earlier and because I had left the Church shortly after, we had never spoken since. That person had remained entirely faithful to the Church until the moment she had been ditched by the Church as a potential liability for having an inoperable tumor and “having outlived her usefulness”.

Now on her death bed and unwilling to be abandoned to her fate by the Church of Scientology who viewed her as nothing more than a useless rotting piece of meat: a carcass to be, she asked for her relatives to find the person who had always been there for her when we both were at Flag and been vastly more successful than anyone else in helping her through auditing. That person was me.

She was extremely glad to see me. Her first words were:”Pierre! you came! I am so glad! You have helped me so much…” I provided her with the help that she needed and her well deserved last rites. Within 48 hours she departed peacefully from her body after an agony that had lasted too long already.

In another country I met an elderly individual who had once been a truly brilliant executive and many decades ago a close confidante of L. Ron Hubbard, someone whose name can be heard on many LRH conferences from the 1950s. Sadly a degenerative disease had ravaged their life and body. I was able to provide effective counselling and assistance to that individual to the point that the care providers told me I had made a difference  for the better.

The third one lived in a country where Scientology is unknown.

That person was now deadly ill and no cure could be found. Years earlier, under David Miscavige guidance, teenage CMO Messengers had treated that person with wanton disrespect for his dignity as a Human being. That prompted the individual to leave.

The Church of Scientology viewed that extremely able and ethical individual as “useless” and an ENEMY, merely for the fact that he had departed the Sea Org while still following all of their rules on leaving. I was invited to deliver an Assist as the family knew I did not apply KSW (Keep Scientology Working Policies)  destructively like the Church of Scientology now specializes itself in. His influential family and the Head of State of that country both arranged for the most competent doctor they could find to help that “Enemy of the Church”. It is little wonder after the leaders of that country had been appraised of the Violation of Human rights on their own citizens by the Church of Scientology, that all Scientology books have now been officially banned from both bookstores and Libraries in that country, because they are viewed as the product of “an Extremist Organization”. I was successful in helping that individual as well.

I had very little sympathy when someone called me direct from the latest Freezone convention and boasted about awards and trophies they had just handed out to people who are top PR artists but horrible auditors when one is actually allowed to examine their session reports. Coincidentally one of the awards recipients had just abandoned a suicidal pc behind and left another go to a psychiatrist mid-intensive and put on anti-psychotics. Neither that auditor nor the Freezone Convention organizers felt the slightest guilt feeling.

I told them that I was on an errand of Mercy at my own expense because it was the right to do: to help those who gave several decades of their lives to help others and LRH develop the technology so that we can all use it, nor merely financially benefit from it, as too many people both in the Church and the Independent field seem to do. The reason I went to help those people was largely because they were too broke to pay my expenses because nobody else in the Church or the Freezone/Independent Field was willing to do it. I had spent many hours cramped in Economy Airplane seats, slept on uncomfortable couches, ate processed food because it was the only thing available, while some of those “award winners” basked in luxurious accommodations and quietly swept their overt products under the carpet.

That person I told this to, went on repeating what I had just said.  I was assigned subsequently lower conditions and told I was a “LIABILITY TO THE FREEZONE” by the self-appointed FREEZONE PR, when I declined to cover up for the auditor whose pcs became suicidal or defected to psychiatry mid intensive and for refusing to stay silent about another one who keeps being invited as guest of honor to events, but is documented to be a child molester. The self-appointed Freezone PR has declared me FAIR GAME since and encouraged both his auditor and those who finance him and pay for his own auditing to do the same.

Judging on the resulting natter, it seems that I missed a lot of withholds that day.

This is why no matter how much natter, lies, rumors and sordid tales the tormented souls whose withholds were missed that night, or other nights, I stand tall whenever I look at my actual actions and motives.

Pierre Ethier

(c) 2013

——

The voice of the victim of a Class VIII speaks louder than just words.

Somehow the voice of the victim has been ignored by PR artists promoting  the abuser.

PRISCILLA PRESLEY

Pierre audited Prescilla Presley

Pierre Ethier audited Prescilla Presley

PRISCILLA  PRESLEY

American actress and businesswoman Priscilla Presley, the ex-wife of cultural icon Elvis Presley and mother of singer-songwriter Lisa Marie Presley, was born on May 24, 1945. She starred in three Naked Gun movies with Leslie Nielsen, and played the character Jenna Wade on the television series Dallas. Presley founded Elvis Presley Enterprises and helped to turn Graceland into a multimillion-dollar tourist attraction.

Eight years after they met, Priscilla and Elvis were married in Las Vegas, Nevada. Their daughter, Lisa Marie, was born the following year, in 1968. Although their marriage didn’t last (they divorced in 1973), Elvis and Priscilla remained friends, and raised Lisa Marie together, until his death in 1977.

Film Credits

PRISCILLA-PRESLEY-Pierre-Ethier-22011 2011 Primetime Creative Arts Emmys (in person), 2010 The ONE Show (in person), 2008 The Insider (in person), 2008 Jimmy Kimmel Live! (in person), 2008 Dancing with the Stars (in person), 2008 Access Hollywood (in person), 2007-2010 Larry King Live (in person), 2007 Elvis: Viva Las Vegas (in person), 2007 Dinner: Impossible (in person), 2006-2010 Entertainment Tonight (in person), 2006 This Morning (in person), 2006 The 50 Greatest Comedy Films (in person), 2006 Canada A.M. (in person), 2006 Breakfast (in person), 2005-2008 The Oprah Winfrey Show (in person), 2005 The Tony Danza Show (in person), 2005 Rove Live (in person), 2005 Late Show with David Letterman (in person), 2005 Friday Night with Jonathan Ross (in person), 2005 Elvis by the Presleys (in person), 2004 Between the Lines (in person), 2002-2005 Biography (in person), 2002 After They Were Famous (in person), 2002 After Dallas (in person), 2000 Hayley Wagner, Star (Performer), 1999 The Rosie O’Donnell Show (in person), 1999 Spin City (Performer), 1998 Finding Graceland (Producer), 1998 Breakfast with Einstein (Producer), 1998 Breakfast with Einstein (Performer), 1997 Touched by an Angel (Performer), 1997 Elvis: His Life and Times (in person), 1997 Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (Performer), 1996 Melrose Place (Performer), 1995 Wetten, dass.. (in person), 1994 Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult (Performer), 1994 Elvis: The Tribute (Producer), 1994 Elvis: The Tribute (in person), 1993 Tales from the Crypt (Performer), 1993 Rock the Vote (in person), 1992 The 9th Annual American Cinema Awards (in person), 1991 Wogan (in person), 1991 The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear (Performer), 1990 The Adventures of Ford Fairlane (Performer), 1990 The 1990 Annual ShoWest Awards (in person), 1990 Live! With Kelly and Michael (in person), 1990 Elvis (Producer), 1989 The 3rd Annual American Comedy Awards (in person), 1988 The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! (Performer), 1988 Elvis and Me (Producer), 1988 Elvis and Me (Writer), 1985 The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson (in person), 1985 Night of 100 Stars II (in person), 1984 Elvis Presley’s Graceland (in person), 1984 Elvis 85 (in person), 1983-1988 Dallas (Performer), 1983 The Fall Guy (Performer), 1983 Love Is Forever (Performer), 1981 The 7th Annual People’s Choice Awards (in person), 1980 Those Amazing Animals (in person), 1980 The John Davidson Show (in person), 1978-2008 Good Morning America (in person)

PRISCILLA-PRESLEY-Pierre-Ethier-3

OTVIII and Beyond

LRH Legacy

 OT VIII and beyond what lies ahead of us???

While all evidence points to the fact that no new OT Level will be released by the Church in our lifetimes, for those lucky enough to have “strayed” away from the yoke of that Institution, the bridge needs not dead-end at OT VIII.

Throughout the years, there have been many speculations as to what OT VIII and beyond were about. A number of uninformed individual even started to broadcast, quite erroneously that LRH had never even researched or written those. The same people are also content to tell that the world that the “last technical lecture from LRH dates from 1972”, utterly oblivious of the fact that in late 1975, LRH gave a series of 22 lectures on the Flag Only “Special Rundown” (later to be called “New Vitality Rundown” or NVRD, to a group of over 40 Tech People.

In 1977, in broadly released issues LRH announced that at least 15 new Levels were fully researched and merely awaiting final write-up. Also the Class X, XI and XII materials make repeated and specific references to these Rundowns coming from “research on OT VIII-XV”.

I have also confirmed from private discussions with a number of individuals, some of which I have known for decades, and whom I consider to be honest and reliable that they even saw the materials themselves.

NEW OT LEVELS VS OLD OT LEVELS

There is no such thing as OLD and NEW OT Levels, except within RTC‘s feverish mind (and therefore those of its followers). Except for “old OT I” (originally developed in 1966 and found in 1967 by LRH to be a dead-end), there has not been, since 1967 any “OLD OT Levels”.

Its core issues written up in 1969, LRH found OT VIII to be “only for a High level Thetan“, and the gradient simply too steep for most people, even a Full OT 7 completion. It took nearly a decade for tech to be developed to address those points.

Continue reading

SCIENTOLOGY: A PASSION FOR GENOCIDE

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XIIThe Church of Scientology promotes Hatred, Discrimination and vilification of anyone who has the guts to expose it to the light of Truth.

All I have done so far is to communicate publicly for them to knock off their Evil ways and to cooperate in ethical and honest ways to promote the spiritual Freedom of individuals. All my communications addressed to the Church and its agents and puppets so far, have fallen on deaf ears.

It is costing them their shirt: Church membership has dwindled by 60% in the past 10 years alone. Their Magazines (Auditor, Advance,Source, Freewinds) betray the true numbers. One has merely to compare the statistics of completions and the names to discover some disturbing facts:

1- The Number of Completions to Major Levels and Rundowns is on a continuous decline, which contradict the generalities and soaring graphs with no scale nor reference points published at events. The events themselves are largely boycotted by its public, which has prompted Senior Management to hire busloads of Extras (non scientologists generic actors) to give the illusion of attendance. Virtually every photo of a crowd at events is photoshopped to multiply its size. It has become so gross that in some cases even a casual observer can discover it on his own.

Doctored promo: Headless man appears 3 times, once with no head, ghostly woman also 3 times and once without a head, the people top right corner and far right are actually proportionately smaller, like hobbits, and the female with the red top is there twice

2- The organizations are almost entirely deserted.  Except for a few large organizations, most Class IV Org around the world have less than a dozen staff. Some of the same organizations had upward of 100 staff in the late 1970s.

3- When David Miscavige high-jacked Scientology resources to defend himself in a copy of Freedom Magazine 2 years ago, the following points could be observed. For each mention of L. Ron Hubbard, David Miscavige name was mentioned three times. Nowhere was there a mention of the TRUE statistics of Scientology; CLEARS AND OTs (because these statistics are dreadfully low and on a steady decline).The only statistics mentioned were the number of square feet and value of Real Estate Property under the Church control. It clearly shows that the Church is primarily interested in the acquisition of wealth.Nowhere does Spiritual Freedom come in the equation any more.

It has been well documented that acquisition of Real Estate property is meant to be distraction for the few remaining faithfuls, to hide the horrible truth that the Church of Scientology is on a toboggan ride toward the bottom.

4- The number of defectors from the Church of Scientology now surpasses its membership  Over 30,000 people have been declared suppressives since RTC came into being in 1982. This is twice as many active Scientologists in good standing within the Church worldwide.

Doctored promo: The woman at the bottom left of the blue circle is standing next to an 8 foot tall black man is there twice

In Scientology every statistic of its Management is now false to protect against the Church worst fear: the discovery of truth by its members: that its leadership is corrupted to the core (David Miscavige denying food and rest to his juniors, but extorting the Sea Org underpaid staff to buy him a $100,000 motorcycle and finance a life of luxury while some Sea Org staff live in conditions more appalling than those found in the poorest countries on Earth). This is why the Church has abandoned LRH ideas of making each org  “saint Hill size” and has “ideal orgs” instead. Saint Hill size is based in numbers. Ideal org is based on opinion and fudginga few meaningless stats. All one has to do is look at the pictures of those ideal orgs in action: they are quiet like morgues and the course rooms are empty.

Stress and invalidation of preclears and Pre-OTs has grown exponentially over the years. Life expectancy for an Upper Level Scientologist on Church lines is now below 57 years.

The Ls are about to become an extinct technology at Flag.Last year the FSO lost two Class XII C/S to cancer (A Kartuzinsky and Richard Reiss). There are only 9 Class XII remaining at Flag and most of them are already Senior Citizens . The Ls are now being mistaught and run differently than the way L Ron Hubaard taught it to the original Class XIIs. They are now run “Miscavige style” and their failure ratio is now 50%. (prior to my departing in 1992, any Class XII with less than 95% success ratio was removed from auditing and sent on a retrain)

The Church actually amuse me whenever they promote the most aberrant fabrications about me or others that they are unable to blackmail because the only one dirty with crimes is the Church itself.The Church typically recruits renegades with a long history of betrayal and people who are according to their own records insane and unfit for services. I have studied enough pc folders of those GO or OSA puppets cases in the past to know it. The Church hires in lieu of journalists, people so aberrated and crazy that the only uniform they should wear is a straight-jacket.

I recognize the recent frenzy of attacks by OSA and the Church for what it is: the death throws of a wild Beast that has been mortally wounded by the black PR that has backfired upon themselves from decades of lies, deceptions and unethical acts and a list of defectors twice as long as its current membership.

One would think that those running the Church would grown a brain or have a sudden attack of sanity and try to reform the Church, but everything including quality of Services seems to be getting worse every year.

One of the lies promoted by the Church is that I keep desperately searching for PCs to audit. Thanks to the great stupidity and incompetence of OSA and the zombies that now abound on Church staff, I am literally besieged by inquiries from traumatized and disgruntled public of the Church. I just cannot find the time to look for new public. I even had to hire a secretary just to address the load.

Their pc complaints are multiple: Gross Auditor code violations: evaluation, Invalidation, squirrel procedures not written in any HCOB but ordered by the failed auditor who now runs the Church (David Micavige was expelled from his Class IV internship at  Saint Hill in the 1970s for gross Auditor code violations and reports of physically assaulting the pc in the session). Registrars and executives pillaging the accounts of public to get book sales and earn a 15% commission. Denigration of the state of Clear,etc.

The numbers are multiplying  Thanks to the Publcity from the Church of Scientology itself. Who believes them? The Ku Klux Klan, the Neo Nazis and the Taliban have now more credibility that the Church of Scientology has remaining.

I certainly would not go out of my way to defend myself against the raving and insane fabrications of lunatics and mass murderers such as Charles Manson,Timothy McVeigh or Osama Bin Laden.In fact I would view personal attacks and parroting of the insane fabrication by these or their stooges,dupes or fans as a form of compliment, meaning that I must be doing something right to get such a degree of attention.

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. described bigotry in the following quotation: “The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.”

My Life philosophy can be resumed in the following sentence:

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

Anyone who thinks that the Church of Scientology has not become an EVIL organization has either become mentally lobotomized or seeks to purposefully promote Evil because of the advantages he or she thinks it will afford him/her.

I have departed the Church of Scientology because by 1992,under its leadership it violated the core principles taught in the fundamentals of its philosophy of helping people and seeking to live with the truth.

I developed disagreement in the view that L. Ron Hubbard had reached a permanent state of Infallibility and could never err. (something by definition reserved only for Deity).

I developed disagreement in the fanatical application of the Scientology procedures,observing that I had a near 100% success rate and those under tight control of the Church had a success below 70% by the time I left and that this ratio has continue to go down since.

I decided that it was wrong for the Church to hide its corrupt activities and to keep on telling tell gross lies to its membership for the sole purpose of increasing the amount of Money controlled by its elite.

Therefore attempt to silence me (Church, Freezone,Independents) simply means that:

1- Those attacking me are deeply afraid. Criticism is defined by L. Ron Hubbard as the desire to Harm with a covert admission that one is incapable of actually doing so. Therefore after too many failures to harm someone of goodwill, the mind becomes psychotic and starts to dream the most frantic and absurd fabrications and soon starts to hallucinate believing in their own lies.

2- Those who propagate Hatred believe they have the right to violate the Human Rights of others if it threaten in their eyes the triumph of their ideology. (This is in itself  the definition of Extremism)

Anyone who departs from the Church by dissenting or embracing different beliefs and religious views than those taught by its current leadership is uniformly treated in the following manner

1. Classification:  People are divided into “us and them”. The Church (or fanatical opponent group like Freezone factions) views itself as the good guys no matter how Evilly they act and feel that attacks anyone who try to show them howto reform Evil.

2. Symbolization “When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups…”

3.Dehumanization “One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects, or diseases.” (squirrels) or ridiculing any handicap, old age etc.

4.Organization Attacks are always organized. Special groups or Specialists execute the pernicious agenda seeking to destroy the targeted individuals/group

5. Polarization “Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda…”

6. Preparation “Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity…” My disagreements with the Church are philosophical and religious in nature.

7.Extermination “It is ‘extermination’ because the perpetrators feel the target is a liability to the greater group or Dynamic and is viewed with deep Hatred. Ostracism, boycott and Isolation are merely the first stages before violence becomes justified in the eyes of the perpetrators because their victims are not truly human.”

8. Denial:The perpetrators… deny that they committed any crimes…” OSA (and its agents) and the Freezone are frequently accomplished liars.

9. Discrimination: Because of its dissenting views and the enactment of the previous steps, both the Church and its offshoots (Freezone/Independents) promote the FAIR GAME LAW and the spreading of calumnies and vilification toward dissenters.

10.Persecution:systematic mistreatment of an individual or group of individuals as a response to their religious beliefs or affiliations or lack thereof.

The Above 10 steps are known as the 10 Stages of Genocide.

It describes very precisely the tactics of the Church toward religious dissension.

Anyone who still promotes the ideals of the Church of Scientology in maligning its religious dissenters and/or who promotes Hatred toward those it dislikes or have physical disabilities,or belong to the “wrong ethnic group” should be labelled for what he or she is:  A GENOCIDE ADVOCATE.

Pierre Ethier

(c) 2013

SCIENTOLOGY: A PASSION FOR GENOCIDE

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XIIThe Church of Scientology promotes Hatred, Discrimination and vilification of anyone who has the guts to expose it to the light of Truth.

All I have done so far is to communicate publicly for them to knock off their Evil ways and to cooperate in ethical and honest ways to promote the spiritual Freedom of individuals. All my communications addressed to the Church and its agents and puppets so far, have fallen on deaf ears.

It is costing them their shirt: Church membership has dwindled by 60% in the past 10 years alone. Their Magazines (Auditor, Advance,Source, Freewinds) betray the true numbers. One has merely to compare the statistics of completions and the names to discover some disturbing facts:

1- The Number of Completions to Major Levels and Rundowns is on a continuous decline, which contradict the generalities and soaring graphs with no scale nor reference points published at events. The events themselves are largely boycotted by its public, which has prompted Senior Management to hire busloads of Extras (non scientologists generic actors) to give the illusion of attendance. Virtually every photo of a crowd at events is photoshopped to multiply its size. It has become so gross that in some cases even a casual observer can discover it on his own.

Doctored promo: Headless man appears 3 times, once with no head, ghostly woman also 3 times and once without a head, the people top right corner and far right are actually proportionately smaller, like hobbits, and the female with the red top is there twice

2- The organizations are almost entirely deserted.  Except for a few large organizations, most Class IV Org around the world have less than a dozen staff. Some of the same organizations had upward of 100 staff in the late 1970s.

3- When David Miscavige high-jacked Scientology resources to defend himself in a copy of Freedom Magazine 2 years ago, the following points could be observed. For each mention of L. Ron Hubbard, David Miscavige name was mentioned three times. Nowhere was there a mention of the TRUE statistics of Scientology; CLEARS AND OTs (because these statistics are dreadfully low and on a steady decline).The only statistics mentioned were the number of square feet and value of Real Estate Property under the Church control. It clearly shows that the Church is primarily interested in the acquisition of wealth.Nowhere does Spiritual Freedom come in the equation any more.

It has been well documented that acquisition of Real Estate property is meant to be distraction for the few remaining faithfuls, to hide the horrible truth that the Church of Scientology is on a toboggan ride toward the bottom.

4- The number of defectors from the Church of Scientology now surpasses its membership  Over 30,000 people have been declared suppressives since RTC came into being in 1982. This is twice as many active Scientologists in good standing within the Church worldwide.

Doctored promo: The woman at the bottom left of the blue circle is standing next to an 8 foot tall black man is there twice

In Scientology every statistic of its Management is now false to protect against the Church worst fear: the discovery of truth by its members: that its leadership is corrupted to the core (David Miscavige denying food and rest to his juniors, but extorting the Sea Org underpaid staff to buy him a $100,000 motorcycle and finance a life of luxury while some Sea Org staff live in conditions more appalling than those found in the poorest countries on Earth). This is why the Church has abandoned LRH ideas of making each org  “saint Hill size” and has “ideal orgs” instead. Saint Hill size is based in numbers. Ideal org is based on opinion and fudginga few meaningless stats. All one has to do is look at the pictures of those ideal orgs in action: they are quiet like morgues and the course rooms are empty.

Stress and invalidation of preclears and Pre-OTs has grown exponentially over the years. Life expectancy for an Upper Level Scientologist on Church lines is now below 57 years.

The Ls are about to become an extinct technology at Flag.Last year the FSO lost two Class XII C/S to cancer (A Kartuzinsky and Richard Reiss). There are only 9 Class XII remaining at Flag and most of them are already Senior Citizens . The Ls are now being mistaught and run differently than the way L Ron Hubaard taught it to the original Class XIIs. They are now run “Miscavige style” and their failure ratio is now 50%. (prior to my departing in 1992, any Class XII with less than 95% success ratio was removed from auditing and sent on a retrain)

The Church actually amuse me whenever they promote the most aberrant fabrications about me or others that they are unable to blackmail because the only one dirty with crimes is the Church itself.The Church typically recruits renegades with a long history of betrayal and people who are according to their own records insane and unfit for services. I have studied enough pc folders of those GO or OSA puppets cases in the past to know it. The Church hires in lieu of journalists, people so aberrated and crazy that the only uniform they should wear is a straight-jacket.

I recognize the recent frenzy of attacks by OSA and the Church for what it is: the death throws of a wild Beast that has been mortally wounded by the black PR that has backfired upon themselves from decades of lies, deceptions and unethical acts and a list of defectors twice as long as its current membership.

One would think that those running the Church would grown a brain or have a sudden attack of sanity and try to reform the Church, but everything including quality of Services seems to be getting worse every year.

One of the lies promoted by the Church is that I keep desperately searching for PCs to audit. Thanks to the great stupidity and incompetence of OSA and the zombies that now abound on Church staff, I am literally besieged by inquiries from traumatized and disgruntled public of the Church. I just cannot find the time to look for new public. I even had to hire a secretary just to address the load.

Their pc complaints are multiple: Gross Auditor code violations: evaluation, Invalidation, squirrel procedures not written in any HCOB but ordered by the failed auditor who now runs the Church (David Micavige was expelled from his Class IV internship at  Saint Hill in the 1970s for gross Auditor code violations and reports of physically assaulting the pc in the session). Registrars and executives pillaging the accounts of public to get book sales and earn a 15% commission. Denigration of the state of Clear,etc.

The numbers are multiplying  Thanks to the Publcity from the Church of Scientology itself. Who believes them? The Ku Klux Klan, the Neo Nazis and the Taliban have now more credibility that the Church of Scientology has remaining.

I certainly would not go out of my way to defend myself against the raving and insane fabrications of lunatics and mass murderers such as Charles Manson,Timothy McVeigh or Osama Bin Laden.In fact I would view personal attacks and parroting of the insane fabrication by these or their stooges,dupes or fans as a form of compliment, meaning that I must be doing something right to get such a degree of attention.

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. described bigotry in the following quotation: “The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.”

My Life philosophy can be resumed in the following sentence:

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

Anyone who thinks that the Church of Scientology has not become an EVIL organization has either become mentally lobotomized or seeks to purposefully promote Evil because of the advantages he or she thinks it will afford him/her.

I have departed the Church of Scientology because by 1992,under its leadership it violated the core principles taught in the fundamentals of its philosophy of helping people and seeking to live with the truth.

I developed disagreement in the view that L. Ron Hubbard had reached a permanent state of Infallibility and could never err. (something by definition reserved only for Deity).

I developed disagreement in the fanatical application of the Scientology procedures,observing that I had a near 100% success rate and those under tight control of the Church had a success below 70% by the time I left and that this ratio has continue to go down since.

I decided that it was wrong for the Church to hide its corrupt activities and to keep on telling tell gross lies to its membership for the sole purpose of increasing the amount of Money controlled by its elite.

Therefore attempt to silence me (Church, Freezone,Independents) simply means that:

1- Those attacking me are deeply afraid. Criticism is defined by L. Ron Hubbard as the desire to Harm with a covert admission that one is incapable of actually doing so. Therefore after too many failures to harm someone of goodwill, the mind becomes psychotic and starts to dream the most frantic and absurd fabrications and soon starts to hallucinate believing in their own lies.

2- Those who propagate Hatred believe they have the right to violate the Human Rights of others if it threaten in their eyes the triumph of their ideology. (This is in itself  the definition of Extremism)

Anyone who departs from the Church by dissenting or embracing different beliefs and religious views than those taught by its current leadership is uniformly treated in the following manner

1. Classification:  People are divided into “us and them”. The Church (or fanatical opponent group like Freezone factions) views itself as the good guys no matter how Evilly they act and feel that attacks anyone who try to show them howto reform Evil.

2. Symbolization “When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups…”

3.Dehumanization “One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects, or diseases.” (squirrels) or ridiculing any handicap, old age etc.

4.Organization Attacks are always organized. Special groups or Specialists execute the pernicious agenda seeking to destroy the targeted individuals/group

5. Polarization “Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda…”

6. Preparation “Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity…” My disagreements with the Church are philosophical and religious in nature.

7.Extermination “It is ‘extermination’ because the perpetrators feel the target is a liability to the greater group or Dynamic and is viewed with deep Hatred. Ostracism, boycott and Isolation are merely the first stages before violence becomes justified in the eyes of the perpetrators because their victims are not truly human.”

8. Denial:The perpetrators… deny that they committed any crimes…” OSA (and its agents) and the Freezone are frequently accomplished liars.

9. Discrimination: Because of its dissenting views and the enactment of the previous steps, both the Church and its offshoots (Freezone/Independents) promote the FAIR GAME LAW and the spreading of calumnies and vilification toward dissenters.

10.Persecution:systematic mistreatment of an individual or group of individuals as a response to their religious beliefs or affiliations or lack thereof.

The Above 10 steps are known as the 10 Stages of Genocide.

It describes very precisely the tactics of the Church toward religious dissension.

Anyone who still promotes the ideals of the Church of Scientology in maligning its religious dissenters and/or who promotes Hatred toward those it dislikes or have physical disabilities,or belong to the “wrong ethnic group” should be labelled for what he or she is:  A GENOCIDE ADVOCATE.

Pierre Ethier

(c) 2013

AVAILABILITY AND INTEGRITY OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS SERIES

Pierre_Ethier-Scientology-Class-XII

AVAILABILITY AND INTEGRITY OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS SERIES

2

TECHNICAL VOLUMES 13 AND 14

 

A number years ago, an enterprising individual took it upon himself to compile the entirety of the Upper Level materials (mainly confidential ones) that were available to him.

Those two volumes were prepared in PDF format and made to look just like the original Technical Volumes issued in 1976

Immediately, the bulk of the Independent field took the compilation as complete, entirely authentic and accurate, three things it simply was not. It seems that acknowledging the fact that some materials were incomplete would have run afoul of a number or practitioners vested interests, especially financial ones. As a result, a number of auditors have been running boot-leg rundowns or rundowns that are attributed to LRH but are in fact the entire creation of Independent auditors of questionable competence.

I have denounced the inaccuracies within those two volumes, to little avail in the past.

Here is an exact summary based on facts by someone who has had access to the entirety of the materials covered in  those volumes:

VOLUME 13

POWER

Whereas all materials but one issue is complete and authentic, the materials are not complete. The way the materials are presented has led a number of auditors to assume very incorrectly that any Class IV, including those who have not even interned would be competent enough to audit those processes. This is definitely not the case. It requires the highest skill to run those processes competently. Particularly notable in their omission, are the materials that explain the actual auditing style and why running Power processing on Clears is destructive to their case and why it is suppressive to do so.

R6EW

The checksheet is missing, but 80% of required materials are present, all of them bona fide. Missing are 5 C/S only or confidential HCOBs that are crucial for proper guidance on the level.

CLEARING COURSE

The entirety of the Clearing Course written materials is presented minus the checksheet.

Missing are all of the Clearing Course Films.  Also three HCOBs that are only found on the SOLO C/S course (and the AO Review Auditor course) that deal with the state of Clear and are crucial in determining the mechanics of Clearing and on what type of auditing it is possible (or impossible) to achieve Clearing. Failure to apply those principles has led to numerous false attests to the state of Clear from pcs on lower levels in the In dependent field, where the Auditor-C/S was simply not qualified to make the adjudication.  The self-appointed Freezone PR has been fanatically active falsely validating those attestations, and chastised me for “speaking against Upstats” even after I showed him evidence that those “Upstats” were in fact very much Downstats and in lower conditions as far as the Tech is concerned. I hope that those who read my comment decide to enlist competent help before blindly attesting people to Clear with no independent test and without someone who is fully trained to validate Clear. A particular organization that specializes in false Clear attest at lower levels decided to direct people on OT II to run the Clearing Course Materials at the same time, “because the pc is very much interested in running those” If those who perpetuate that out-tech had only bothered to train properly they would have realized that the reason for such interest was that the fact that these individuals had never archived the state of Clear in the first place!

Some ignorant individuals have renamed their own copies of the 1958 Clearing Congress Films held in Washington DC as “Clearing Course Films”

For the record: there are 6 Clearing Course films (5 technical briefings, one demo session)

The Bank and its pattern (1964)

The Materials of the R6 Bank (1965)

Composition of the Bank (1966)

The Technical Materials (1966)
General Information (1966)
Auditing Demonstration  (1966)

VOLUME 14

OT I

Complete and authentic materials of all past and present version of OT I

 

OT II

Complete and authentic materials. One page from the platens is omitted, most likely the result of an error. The text version of Volume 14 has the missing page.

OT III

Complete and authentic materials as far as the student OT III course pack goes.

5 OT III C/S and Remedy/Review HCOBs are missing. These HCOBs are crucial for programming certain types of remedy. Only auditors who have audited OT III reviews at an AO or Flag or trained on the Solo C/S course are likely to have ever read those bulletins.

ORIGINAL OT IV-VII

Each of those levels is in some way altered from the version written by LRH.

The original materials of these levels were entirely written in LRH hand. The materials presented in Volume 14 are typed materials.

OT IV has some crucial Processes/Drills omitted from it. The C/S instruction on C/Sing the level are entirely missing. The first step of OT IV is an audited rundown audited by a Class VIII. Misguided Freezone C/Ses with the Quickie impulse are known to instruct people to do that step Solo, even though it is clearly a Review Action and has a secret purpose not revealed to the pc but known by the C/S.

OT VII is entirely different than the version written by LRH. It turns out to be the “EDUCTIVISM” version. Eductivism was Jack Horner (pronounced squirrel by LRH and persecuted for it) own take and version of Scientology in the 1960s and 1970s. Jack Horner believed in the vital importance of running Creative Processing. LRH ordered Creative Processing abandoned during the 1950s, after observing that it tended to beef up the bank in a number of cases.

Anyone reading that version of OT VII will instantly notice that it contains many Creative processing processes and therefore an immediate giveaway that it cannot be authentic.

The true version of OT VII start with an assessment before any process is run.

And last but not least, the End Phenomenon of OT VII is not mentioned, making one wonders if all those who trumpet completing people on OT VII are truly giving their pcs what they had been promised ,if neither they nor the pc truly know the EP.

NEW OT V: NOTS

Mainly Complete. Authentic materials. A few of the NOTs series are missing.

There are a total of 55 NOTs series Bulletins plus a number of additions and attachments.

NOTE: NOTs 53 is missing. It was a useful bulletin called ERRORS ON NOTs, which gave useful and realistic examples on how NOTs cases could be debugged. Because it was written by David Mayo, in 1982 all copies were ordered to be pulled out of packs and anywhere else and turned over to RTC. Everyone having access to that bulletin was sec-checked to ensure no copy had survived.

NOTS 56 is a forgery. I am told that a “FREEZONE AUTHORITY” had certified it as authentic.

All one has to do is use to google to discover it was a parody written by Keith Henson.

NEW OT VI: SOLO NOTS

No checksheet exist.  most of the Solo NOTS only materials are missing. For a full rundown on what the full Solo NOTs materials consist of, please read my essay on the Synopsis of Solo NOTs

ORIGINAL OT VIII

The lone HCOB in that section is authentic. It is the only HCOB ever issued that has OT VIII in either the title or the distribution.

Paradoxically that HCOB has never been part of OT VIII as delivered on the Freewinds or by the Church.

NEW OT VIII

This is one of the three versions of OT VIII released by the Church. It was released after the fiasco of the first version of OT VIII on the Maiden Voyage. Out of 300 people who did that version of OT VIII, more than 40 had dropped dead within 3 months. This was a tightly kept secret. Since i was working in the OT VIII Eligibility HGC at the time, I became privy to all sort of information on the matter.

In late 1988, the following Tech terminals were secretly RPFed:

Ray Mithoff, actual author of the Freewinds OT VIII with some assistance from LRH handwritten notes. As is the case with all Scientology compilations since 1985, David Miscavige had absolute veto power over it and approved its release.

The entire Freewind (FSSO) OT VIII delivery team except for one course Supervisor, the OT VIII review Auditor and the Tech page. It specifically included Margaret Supak (Senior C/S FSSO) and the late Laura Wolfe (OT VIII C/S)

At the FSO the following two C/Ses were RPFed for having an unusually high proportion of the dead among people they had C/sed: Ruthe Humprey and Dan McNicholl.

A number of year ago, Ariane Jackson, a former friend and pc of mine became livid when she discovered how abused and ripped off her ex-husband had been by the Church and had literally died of a broken Heart with Scientology.  (His diary has been published on the Internet under the title: Diary of a Dying Scientologist).She decided to punish the Church by telling all  she knew about OT VIII on the Internet.

I immediately emailed Ariane and we had a series of pleasant communications. The next day she wrote me, informing me that there were 8 lawyers representing the Church in her living room. Ariane was never heard of again. It requires no great ability to speculate what happened next: the two million dollars in loans arranged by the Church that her ex-husband had made to dead-beats, being reimbursed to her and their child, plus hush money and a gag order..

L10

Grossly inaccurate and incomplete materials.

It includes the Class X course checksheet. For some reason all of the auditors who claim to deliver L-10 in the independent field make nothing of the fact that there are 24 theory bulletins on the Checksheet that are not available in any form nor even an abridged summary. Those bulletins explains the procedures, the auditing style and general prerequisites and core theory of the rundown.

Most of the process sheets in that section are as Warren McShane had testified in court “unartful and severely incomplete reconstructions”.

I have repeatedly stated that one of the missing bulletins states that you can seriously deteriorate a case or even kill him by misrunning L-10. This has been always glossed over by those who have a financial interest in delivering rundowns they are not qualified for, since most of these pseudo-auditors instantly wash their hands of any overt product they make, much like a cheap mechanic who refuse to honor any warranty on his repairs as long as the car has been driven out of his lot.

L11

This pathetic reconstruction fails to explain the theory behind the rundown nor how it is achieved. Some of the steps are even given in the wrong sequence.

L12

Very poor reconstruction with none of the theory behind L12 explained in any way. Several of the techniques used on L-12 are only described in an LRH briefing. Neither the tape, nor a transcript, or even notes or summary of it are known to exist outside of the Church

Anyone who delivers that rundown under those conditions is deeply out-ethics and can have only financial motives for delivering a rundown that can easily deteriorate a case (and in some celebrated cases in the Independent field) make them act like ranting lunatics.

NEW VITALITY RUNDOWN

Quickiest of the quickies is the only way to describe this laughable write-up by Russ Meadows who was declared Suppressive in 1976 under orders by LRH. The 1976 HCOB “Auditing reports, Falsifying of” summarize Russ’s career. His write up omits almost everything of importance, starting with the fact that the New Vitality Rundown is a Dianetics Rundown. This has led a Squirrel in the US Midwest to market that “LRH Rundown” while he delivers processes of his own manufacture instead. Having failed to produce the expected result of a Valence shift, the pseudo-auditor then runs NOTs commands and procedures on lower level pcs. When I privately chastised the auditor for both Fraud (selling an out-tech Rundown of his own manufacture while claiming it is LRH) and squirreling (auditing NOTs procedures on lower level cases), his reaction was extremely violent. He wrote a Suppressive Person Declare on me and distributed it to his “Friends”. He then added the heinous fabrication that I wished his wife dead. I did not even know he was married and to this day I do not even know the name of that woman nor anything about her. I never wish people dead. It is against my basic philosophy. I want criminals to stop being out-ethics and I wish liars to stop lying because according to my fundamental belief, anyone can redeem himself. Only someone cruel wish to see people dead.

 

BRIGHT THINK RUNDOWN

These bulletins are authentic. They were released in 1978 but soon after were withdrawn stating that their use was restricted to SuperPower only.

 

SUPERPOWER

The version of SuperPower is a pure work of fantasy from the Freezone.

The correct SuperPower Rundown as originally conceived by LRH consist of the following 12 steps:

C/S 53 (as included in the Tech Volumes)

Ethics repair list (the original list issued in 1978 is NOT the same as the one in Volume 14.The Ethics Repair List in Volume 14 was written by a person with a long history of out 2D and alcoholism)

Personal revival rundown (not released /known in the Independent field)

Consequences rundown  (not released/known in the Independent field)

Bright think rundown (as described above)

Study green form (in the New Tech Volumes)

False data rundown parts I and II  (not released/known in the Independent field)

Cause rundown  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

Power of choice rundown  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

 Perception rundown  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

 Learning drills  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

Physical universe drills  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

The original purpose of SuperPower was to resolve all the ills that make staff members poor workers or ineffective.

ANALYSIS OF THE BOGUS SUPERPOWER STEPS

 

1- A ludicrous statement is made about there being a “condition of No Condition” Obviously the one who designed that step failed to word Clear the word Condition, which means state of being. One cannot avoid being in some form of state of being, even postulating oneself in the lowest possible levels of unconsciousness or non-existence causes someone to still be in some type of state of being or condition.  It is followed by the command to “Find a Viewpoint”. If the author of that process had understood the axioms well, he would have written “Assume a Viewpoint” instead.

2- The next step directs the person to violate all known references on exterior and ending sessions, plus those on persistent F/N. It then introduces the false datum that one can audit over a big win and over a persistent F/N. The author appears to never have read the definition of a persistent F/N: it persists, therefore by definition you could no longer get reads without having killed it first, yet the authors insinuate that only a Floating TA cause an F/N to be truly persistent.

3-This is followed by a Creative Processing Process. Owing to their having been abandoned by LRH long ago, it is proof by itself that the process cannot be genuine.

4- A seriously altered version of the Ethics Repair list with a number of important questions omitted.

5- The next step is another Creative Processing Action

6- The last set of process shows its author confusion on flows, some of the commands have Flow one reversed with Flow 2 or have flow 3 omitted.

The last Creative Processes in this rundown are a form of Validation Processing. Long experience with that kind of process has shown that they have built in instability within them and that the key-outs created by that type of process not only do not last long, but frequently result in an eventual very strong key-in days or months later. At least one case in the Independent field that had been doing well before the rundown was started committed suicide shortly after completing it.

Therefore consider as out-ethics any auditor still running this rundown once they have been appraised of the data above.

Obviously those whose overts are restimulated by my analysis above will probably attack me.

It is my hope that others, which form the majority, will benefit greatly from my statements and be able to make better and effective progress toward improvement and a better state of well-being.

Pierre Ethier

The Little Prince by Exupery

catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier

Source: link

…….Indeed, as I learned, there were on the planet where the little prince lived– as on all planets– good plants and bad plants. In consequence, there were good seeds from good plants, and bad seeds from bad plants. But seeds are invisible. They sleep deep in the heart of the earth’s darkness, until some one among them is seized with the desire to awaken. Then this little seed will stretch itself and begin– timidly at first– to push a charming little sprig inoffensively upward toward the sun. If it is only a sprout of radish or the sprig of a rose-bush, one would let it grow wherever it might wish. But when it is a bad plant, one must destroy it as soon as possible, the very first instant that one recognizes it.

Now there were some terrible seeds on the planet that was the home of the little prince; and these were the seeds of the baobab. The soil of that planet was infested with them. A baobab is something you will never, never be able to get rid of if you attend to it too late. It spreads over the entire planet. It bores clear through it with its roots. And if the planet is too small, and the baobabs are too many, they split it in pieces. . .

“It is a question of discipline,” the little prince said to me later on. “When you’ve finished your own toilet in the morning, then it is time to attend to the toilet of your planet, just so, with the greatest care. You must see to it that you pull up regularly all the baobabs, at the very first moment when they can be distinguished from the rosebushes which they resemble so closely in their earliest youth. It is very tedious work,” the little prince added, “but very easy.”

And one day he said to me: “You ought to make a beautiful drawing, so that the children where you live can see exactly how all this is. That would be very useful to them if they were to travel some day. Sometimes,” he added, “there is no harm in putting off a piece of work until another day. But when it is a matter of baobabs, that always means a catastrophe. I knew a planet that was inhabited by a lazy man. He neglected three little bushes. . . ”

So, as the little prince described it to me, I have made a drawing of that planet. I do not much like to take the tone of a moralist. But the danger of the baobabs is so little understood, and such considerable risks would be run by anyone who might get lost on an asteroid, that for once I am breaking through my reserve. “Children,” I say plainly, “watch out for the baobabs!” My friends, like myself, have been skirting this danger for a long time, without ever knowing it; and so it is for them that I have worked so hard over this drawing. The lesson which I pass on by this means is worth all the trouble it has cost me.

Perhaps you will ask me, “Why is there no other drawing in this book as magnificent and impressive as this drawing of the baobabs?”

The reply is simple. I have tried. But with the others I have not been successful. When I made the drawing of the baobabs I was carried beyond myself by the inspiring force of urgent necessity.

Related links:
http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/the-baobabs-of-tomorrow/

The Little Prince by Exupery

catherine-ethier-wife-of-pierre-ethier

Source: link

…….Indeed, as I learned, there were on the planet where the little prince lived– as on all planets– good plants and bad plants. In consequence, there were good seeds from good plants, and bad seeds from bad plants. But seeds are invisible. They sleep deep in the heart of the earth’s darkness, until some one among them is seized with the desire to awaken. Then this little seed will stretch itself and begin– timidly at first– to push a charming little sprig inoffensively upward toward the sun. If it is only a sprout of radish or the sprig of a rose-bush, one would let it grow wherever it might wish. But when it is a bad plant, one must destroy it as soon as possible, the very first instant that one recognizes it.

Now there were some terrible seeds on the planet that was the home of the little prince; and these were the seeds of the baobab. The soil of that planet was infested with them. A baobab is something you will never, never be able to get rid of if you attend to it too late. It spreads over the entire planet. It bores clear through it with its roots. And if the planet is too small, and the baobabs are too many, they split it in pieces. . .

“It is a question of discipline,” the little prince said to me later on. “When you’ve finished your own toilet in the morning, then it is time to attend to the toilet of your planet, just so, with the greatest care. You must see to it that you pull up regularly all the baobabs, at the very first moment when they can be distinguished from the rosebushes which they resemble so closely in their earliest youth. It is very tedious work,” the little prince added, “but very easy.”

And one day he said to me: “You ought to make a beautiful drawing, so that the children where you live can see exactly how all this is. That would be very useful to them if they were to travel some day. Sometimes,” he added, “there is no harm in putting off a piece of work until another day. But when it is a matter of baobabs, that always means a catastrophe. I knew a planet that was inhabited by a lazy man. He neglected three little bushes. . . ”

So, as the little prince described it to me, I have made a drawing of that planet. I do not much like to take the tone of a moralist. But the danger of the baobabs is so little understood, and such considerable risks would be run by anyone who might get lost on an asteroid, that for once I am breaking through my reserve. “Children,” I say plainly, “watch out for the baobabs!” My friends, like myself, have been skirting this danger for a long time, without ever knowing it; and so it is for them that I have worked so hard over this drawing. The lesson which I pass on by this means is worth all the trouble it has cost me.

Perhaps you will ask me, “Why is there no other drawing in this book as magnificent and impressive as this drawing of the baobabs?”

The reply is simple. I have tried. But with the others I have not been successful. When I made the drawing of the baobabs I was carried beyond myself by the inspiring force of urgent necessity.

Related links:
http://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/the-baobabs-of-tomorrow/

Partial list of public audited

The following is a partial list of PCs Pierre have audited  that was officially published by the Church of Scientology. It is not in any way exhaustive and consists of roughly 3500 people out of about 5000. Anyone on this list (or not) is welcome to contact Pierre. With virtually no exception, he enjoyed auditing each of those people. Pierre provided counseling as a volunteer minister for 20 years at no pay. Dalai Lama  says , quote: “Those who, through  their personal suffering,  truly want to end completely  all the suffering of others  are persons of supreme capacity. ” Pierre is one of those people of supreme capacity.

 Pierre is going over the list and recalling the gains and life changing improvements he saw in those people provided him with hours of happy memories: “My ultimate desire is for each of these people to reach happiness and spiritual Freedom, whether they achieve it in the Church of Scientology or in another. A lot of those names have not been on Flag completion list for a very long time. Each and everyone should be told that

“NO CHURCH HOLDS A MONOPOLY ON SPIRITUAL FREEDOM OR THE STATES OF BEINGNESS PROMISED BY L. RON HUBBARD”.

Anyone can move forward from whatever point they have been stopped, betrayed or given arbitrary actions that were not designed to help them.” Pierre says

Note: We have received the following special request by  John Brownlee to include his name in the incomplete list of PC-s I have audited and I am gladly revising the list: “I never saw my name on your list of people you had audited so I didn’t make the connection until fairly recently. I am recalling now that you DID audit me once at Flag back in 1980. But thank you. This is belated, I know, but you helped me a lot in those few short hours-if it was even one hour all told. And it made a difference”

Related links:

Pierre-Ethier-Albert-Einstein

Alberto Abate, Mario Abbiati, Stefania Abbiati, Tom Abrams, Delia Acheson, Doug Acheson, Hans-Ruedi Ackle, Suzette Ackle, Angela Acosta, Mary Acosta, Ramon Acosta, Robin Adair, GianFranco Adami, Bob Adams, Gene Adams, June Adams, Mary Adams, Chris Adler, Fernando Adler, Lloyd Adler, Lottie Adler, David Agami, Elias Agami, Roberto Agami, Theresa Agami, Vicky Agami, Viviane Agami, Frank Aggio, Eliana Aguilar, Patricia Aguilar, Elaine Aguirre, Peter Aguirre, Juan Aguirrebeitia, Robert Ahoua, Margaret Ainsworth, Aldo Airoldi, Debra Aitken, Lena Akesson, Linda Aldrete, Angela Alemania, Alex Alemis, Cathy Alessandrini, Maurizio Alessi, Peter Alevizos, Lee Alexander, Minty Alexander, Peter Alexander, Rick Alexander, Dixon Allen, Gabrielle Allen, Jane Allen, Terry Allen, Lynda Allender, Patricia Almeida, Robert Almqvist, Richard Almstead, Stephen Alpert, Felix Altorfer, Heidi Altorfer, Marianna Altorfer, Diana Alvarado, Enrique Alvarado, Lucio Alverez, Maria-Fernanda Amaya, Konrad Ambach, Amanda Ambrose, Roland Ambuhl, Carol Anahu, Clare Anahu, Bob Anderson, Candy Anderson, Carol Anderson, Cindy Anderson, Doug Anderson, Michael Anderson, Rick Anderson, Sherry Anderson, Roland Andersson, Joe Andruscavage, Greg Angus, Pamela Angus, Dee Ann Rule, Lisa Ann Malmquist, Mary Ann Durham, Jo Anne Beachy, Jo Anne Christensen, Dodley Anson, Elizabeth Anstrin, Peter Anstrin, Luis Antoni Perez, Tiziano Antonini, Peter Antonio, Philip Antonio, Luis Antonios Vasquez, Stefano Antonucci, Luciano Apperti, Mariano Apperti, Mauro Apperti, Juan Arambula, Edurne Aranguren, Michel Archambault, Carlos Arena, Cherie Arend, Tony Arend, Ruth Arguelles, Miguel Arguello, Alejandro Aristi, Michael Armentrout, Janice Armstrong, Raoul Arnal, Gerry Arnett, Ramon Arnold, Vicky Arnold, Rafael Arredo, Philippe Arsac, John Arvanitakis, Tomas Arvidsson, Peter Asberg, Sandro Asnaghi, Harout Assadourian, Bob Asselin, Robert Asselin, Doug Atcheson, Douglas Atcheson, Bruce Atkinson, Peter Atkinson, Bertha Aubert Llorens, Armando Aubert, Bertha Aubert, Helen Audrey Stewart, Pierre Auget, Peter August, Carol Austin, David Austin, Jeff Avrin, Karen Aylor, Rebecca Azares, Inma Azpitarte, Irma Azpitarte, George Baca, Mariella Baccari, Adelio Bacchi, Ornella Bacchi, Frederick Badger, Edwin Baer, Susan Baez, Gianfranco Baggio, Robert Bagnall, Paul Baikie, Roland Baikley, Brigitte Bailke, Wolfgang Baitz, Joanne Baker, John Brownlee, Sally Baker, Yiva Balazs, Mike Ball, Mike Ballard, Otis Ballard, Frederick Balmaele, Fulvio Balmelli, Edgar Bammatter, Fulvio Bandera, Giovanni Bandieri, Giuseppe Bandierini, Henvelle Bandroin, Ken Banfield, Britta Bang, Alison Banks, David Banks, Hanna Baram, Michael Baram, Paul Barbaro, Steve Barbera, Alain Barbier, Jean-Luc Barbier, Antonella Barbieri, Giorgio Barbieri, Sandra Barbieri, carlos Barcena, Vivian Bardavid, Gavin Bargate, Dee Barker, Mary Barne Mann, Debra Barnes, Cathy Barnett, Gabriela Baroni, Michael Barram, Kay Barres, Chuck Barron, Elizabeth Barron, Olivia Barron, Bob Bartell, Donna Barton, Geoffrey Barton, Pamela Barton, Ray Barton, Win Barton, Steve Basin, Chere Bauman, Molly Baxter, Randy Baxter, Liz Bayback, Robin Beaman, Sarah Bean, Joan Beats, Shane Beats, Anne Beatty, Karin Beatty, Richard Beatty, Karen Beaty, Joanne Beaubien, Phil Beaubien, Jocelyne Beauregard Jocelyne Beauregard, Pierre Beauregard, Pierre Beauregards, Donna Beaven, Carlos Becerra, Gabi Beck, Peter Beck, Emily Becker, Stephanie Becquet, Susanne Beeh, Suzanne Beeh, Carol Beeny, carol Beeny, Hannelore Behdig, Ray Behm, Jean Beigantz, Robert Beilhart, Robert Bein, Susana Bejarano, Enzo Beletti, Enzo Belletti, John Bellmaine, Vanessa Bellmaine, Gale Belsel, John Belue, Javier Benet, Martha Benilles, Gracia Bennish, Gisele Benoit, Rolly Berdna, Jacqueline Bergantz, Bobbie Berger, David Berger, Yogi Berger, Linda Bergman, Mitzi Bergman, Albie Berk, Anthony Berka, candy Berman, Ray Bernard, Sergio Bernardini, Roberto Bernazzoli, Eva Berryman, John Berryman, Sylvie Berson, Marino Bertoli, Luigi Bertoni, Sylvie Bertrand, Alain Berube, Franco Beschi, Sharon Besio, Steve Besio, Jean Besre, Richard Best, Leni Betes, Sue Bettinger, Florence Bezazian, Paul Bezazian, Hennie Bezuidenhout, Fabbian Biagio, Loredana Biancolini, Cathy Bible, Monica Biddle, Gaby Bilodeau, Dario Binda, Donato Biondi, Rick Birkenshaw, Donatella Birolo, Laurie Bittner, Karen Black, Michael Black, Stephanie Black, Tina Black, Doris Blair, Eva Blake, Corinne Blanc, Yves Blanc, Sandrine Blanchet, Alain Blanchette, Tony Blanco, Charles Blankenship, Ellie Blankenship, Lise Blankertz, Angelika Blaskovich, Carol Blaut, Jay Blaut, Alexander Blechinger, Dean Blehert, Pamela Blehert, Henry Blumenthal, Frank Blumer, Dieter Blumler, Lorentz Blumler, Paolo Boarato, Dan Boardsen, Silvano Bobadilla, Remo Boden, Arlene Boeger, William Boeger, Serd Boehm, Ginny Boehme, Patrice Boesinger, Donald Bohn, Donna Bohn, Pierre Bolduc, Ellie Bolger, Maureen Bolisczak, Michael Bollen, Michel Bollen, Michael Bolln, Giorgi Bonardi, Giorgio Bonardi, Sonia Bonfiglioli, Simone Bongiovanni, Caroline Bonifas, Rosa Bonisoli, Donald Bonn, Massimo Bonoldi, Paolo Boratao, Christa Bordewieck, Gianluca Bordoni, Jorg Borgmann, Al Born, Kai Bornemann, Susanne Bornemann, Carl Borowski, Carlos Borrero, Giuseppe Borsarini, Jane Bosan, Christian Bosiger, Patrice Bosiger, Patrice Bosinger, Jane Boson, Glen Bostrom, Wendy Bostrom, Nick Bot, Carol Bottle, Claude Boublil, Julian Bouchard, Calisre-Marie Boujon, Francois Boulbil, Francoise Boulbil, Hank Bourland, Denise Boutin, Richard Bovey, Bill Bowen, David Bowers, Janet Bowes, Theo Box, Stephen Boyko, Steven Boyko, Alejandro Bozzone, Bernard Brackenshaw, Ulrich Bracunig, George Bradley, Gregory Bradley, Hugh Bradley, Jeff Bradley, Jeff Bradshaw, Lisa Bragato, Lucia Bragg, Ted Braggin, Antonio Braggion, Antinio Braggione, Antonio Braggione, Brigitte Brandle, Christian Brandle, Karl Braun Steiner, Morgans Bredsdorf, Gabi Brendel, Peter Brendel, Giovanna Brenicci, Pino Brenicci, Annette Brennan, Rob Brennan, Sandra Brennan, Naomi Bresaham, Dee-Dee Bressert, Jim Brewer, Carleen Bridgetown, David Brier, Maureen Brigatti, Rita Bright, Anne Briscoe, Naomi Brisnehan, Bill Broderick, Christa Broderick, Ed Broderick, Cammie Brodie, Patrick Broeker, Louis-Michel Brolles, Madeline Broman, Harry Bronsoiler, Lilis Bronsoiler, Gaetan Brouilette, Christine Brovcenko, Cathy Brown, Charles Brown, Judy Brown, Hans Brugemann, Gro Brugermann, Greg Brumley, Marie-Therese Brunet, Alain Brunette, Larry Bruning, Ruth Brunner, Ed Bryan, Daniel Bryenton, Giacomo Bucchi, Heimo Bucerius, Anna Buch-Hansen, Doris Buchel, Annabel Bueno, Beth Bueno, Sue Bueno, Kathy Bulawa, Hamish Bulger, Lorraine Bulger, Martine Bullot, Claudio Burchi, Irene Burgener, Ray Burgess, Don Burgett, Donald Burgett, Jane Burgett, Arnell Burghorn, Florence Burghorn, Jim Burghorn, Shannon Burke, Lynn Burkhart, Monika Burkli, Roberto Burlone, James Burnham, Jeffrey Burr Johnson, Nancy Burton, Jim Bush, Rex Bush, Ray Butera, Laura Butki, Debbie Butler, William Butler, Tony Butzlaff, Jarrett Buys, Peter Buzzelli, Karen Bydlo, Dan Byl, Peter Byrne, Char Byrnes, Jessica Byrnes, Larry Byrnes, Lawrence Byrnes, Alejandro Cabrera, Elvis Cabrera, Idea Cabrera, Patrizio Cabrini, Elena Cabrino, Lisa Cabrino, Warren Caggiano, Cinzia Cagnoni, Alessia Cairoli, Giorgio Cairoli, Juliette Calame, Sergio Calcinai, Ida Calder, Antionetta Calderon, Guillermo Calderon, Letitia Calderon, Maria-Antonieta Calderon, Sarah Calderon, Barbara Caldwell, Elaine Caldwell, Eric Caldwell, Giovanni Calicchio, Giuseppe Calicchio, Haracio Caligiuri, Fausto Callegarini, Rosette Calliauw, George Calpin, Lisetta Calzolari, Lisette Callarata, Lee Cambigue (Mr), Lee Cambique (Mrs), Nancy Cameron, Antonio Cammarata, Gaetano Cammarata, Salvatore Cammarata, Mark Campbell, Baby Campos, Dolores Campos, Jose-Luis Campos, Susana Campos, Frank Camuso, Gilbert Canali, Paolo Canali, Bruno Cantalupi, Gianni Canuti, Hector Cardenas, Barbara Cardona, Juan Cardona, Maria-Terese Cardona, Chuck Carel, Pat Carel, Pat Carey, Ruth Carey, Jerry Caril, Dixie Carlisle, Hank Carlson, Marti Carlson
, Mike Carlson,
Scott Carmichael, Ida Carrera, Gina Carrerra, Joanne Carrier, Steve Carrier, Julie Carrol, Gail Carroll, Noel Carroll, Ann Carter, Marylin Carvin, Vickie Case, Doug Casey, Carlos Casillas, Juan Casillas, Claudia Caspary, Raymond Cassano, Sheryle Cassano, Alfonso Castaneira, Jorge Castaneira, Lisa Castellani, Jacinto Castellano, Virgilio Castellano, Carlos Casteneira, Virginia Casteneira, Antonella Castignoli, Carlos Castillo, Lucinda Castillo, Rosana Castillo, Eugenio Castillo,, Betty Castleman, Elizabeth Castleman, Ken Castleman, Rosita Castro, Massimo Cavadenti, Stephanie Cayouette, Nadia Cedro, Julian Cerati, Denise Ceresnak, Berenice Cervantes, Jean Chacon, John Chadder, Mary Chadder, Andrew Chalmers, Alan Chamberlain, Allen Chamberlin, Don Chamberlin, James Chamberlin, John Chambers, Rebecca Chambers, Luis Chamorro, Julie Champness, Mick Champness, Michael, Chandler, Tom Chandler, Karin Chapman, Peter Charbonneau, Jean Charbonnier, Jeanie Charles, John Charlesworth, Louise Charnonneau, Mike Chatelain, Julio Chavez, Martha Chavez, Jeff Chee, Brigitte Chelin, Hellen Chen, Nancy Chepey, Murie Cheshire, Alain Chevrot, Henriette Chevrot, Felipe Child, Filipe Child, Maria-Teresa Child, Roberto Child, Rosario Child, Pam Chipman, Pamela Chipman, Corine Chiquet, Francoise Chiquet, Gerard Chiquet, Josette Chiquet, Luisa Chiricho, Jay Chitteroe, Mireille Chouraki, Lorna Chrichton, Monica Christen, Carl Christensen, James Christensen, Jamie Christensen, Joanne Christensen, Kurt Christensen, Mie Christensen, Malcolm Christiansen, Gillian Christie-Cullen, Gerd Christoffel, Gerry Chromoy, Jeanie Chromoy, Michael Church, Mauro Cinquepalmi, David Cintron, Bruce Cladwell, Bruce Clark, Evelyne Clark, Fran Clark, Jane Clark, Jeanne Clark, Jenny Clark, Michael Clark, Mike Clark, Shirley Clark, Garrison Clarke, Peter Clarke, Jean Claude Smadja, Karl Clausen, Nancy Clay, Peter Clay, Robert Clay, Tom Clay, Emily Clayton, John Clegg, Charles Clements, Dale Clerk, Maria Clovet Bridget Cobb, Maxine Cocain, Giuliano Cocchetti, Guigliana Cocchetti, Jan Cockerill, Judith Code, Keith Code, Joaquim Coelho, Art Colaianni, Lucy Cole, Ross Cole, Allen Collins, Jim Collins, Regina Collins, Sally Colloden, Franco Comi, Carlo Comincini, Maria-Luisa Como, Kathy Conable, kathy Conable, Maria Conceicao, Kathy Condon, Maggie Condon, Margaret Condon, Robert Condon, Ron Condron, Robert Conn, June Connelly, Lynn Connor, Bernd Conradi, Elke Conradi, fabian Conti, Richard Cook, Giancarla Coppi, Ernest Corbett, Gaye Corbett, Arlette Corbi, Paolo Corbi, Jose Cordero, Andre Cordet, Maria Cordova, Shirley Coriveau, Rebecca Cormier, Skip Cormier, Daphne Cornelius, Vernon Cornelius, Ewald Cornelsen, Marc Coromina Hector Cortes, Patty Cortes, Noemi Cortinovis, Luisa Cossini, Giuliano Cossu, Robasto Costanzo, Jennifer Costello, Denis Cote, Ghislan Cote, Paul Cote, Marie-Louise Courvoisier, Marianne Couvoisier, Helen Covary Fritsch, Michael Covin, Maria Covini, John Cowden, Brian Coyle, Bryan Coyle, Ed Cramb, Larry Cramer, Susan Crausaz, Bill Crawford, Ginger Crawler, Michele Crescetino, Bruno Crestino, Adelio Crippa, mario Crippa, Miriam Crippa, Ralph Criscione, Rick Crites, Ron Crites, Gabrielle Crittendon, Barry Critzer, Beppe Crivella, Malcolm Croft, Jim Crosser, Bill Crossley, Roddie Crouch, Emil Crough Allan Crouse, Lisa Crundall, Peter Crundall, Virgilio Cruzado, Gerardo Cucciniello, Mariana Cuenca, Gwen Culbert, Chris Cullen, Sally Culloden, Patrick Cultiera, Peter Cunningham, Elizabeth Currier, Glenn Currier, Jaye Curry, Mike Curry, David Curtis, Patricia Curtis, Yolande Curty, Matteo D’Agnelli, Louis Da Re, Susan Da Re, Alicia Dabbah, Lucy Dabbah, Salomon Dabbah, Bob Dahlquist, Robert Dahlquist, Jacinthe Daigle, Barbara Dakin, Sonja Dal Borgo, Luciano Daldosso, Raoul Dallaire, Antonella Dallari, kathy Dalziel, Karin Damian, Marisa Damiani, Marcos Dana, Cindy Dangberg, Gunther Dangela, Dana Danhoff, Nazmy Daniel, Dick Danilobb, Peter Daniloff, Alycia Danilovich, Harold Danko, Roberto Danne, Francesco DaPasquale, Silvia Dare Susan Daugherty, Jose-Luis Davila, Cathy Davis, Chris Davis, Kennny Davis, Les Davis, Leslie Davis, Lonnie Davis, Nancy Davis, Naomi Davis, Paul Davis, Vicki Davis, Peggy Day Westerman, Brian Day, Doreen Day, Andree De Thiersant, Beatriz De Aguilar, Bernard De La Cour, Celia De Mello, Gisele De Benoit, Hennie De Ridder, Henri De Bruyn, Iria De La Vaccarra, Javier De Aguinaga, Jill De Hochepied, Jim De Grosa, Justa De Villiers, Maria De Landez Ferreira, Marie De Thiersant, Peter De La Cour, Pierre De Thiersant, Tom De Grandpre, Ursula De Leon, Galee Dean, Gaylee Dean, Richard Dean, Alicia Debbah, Henri DeBryun, Thiery DeChaunac, Madeleine DeFreitas, John Dekiewitt, Antonio Del Francia, Bernard Delacour, Jacqueline Delafraye, Odile Delafraye, Patrick Delafraye, Pierre Delance, Jean-Pierre Deleze, Antonio Della Giovanna, Marc Delomez, Odile Delomez, Giovanna Delzanno, Henry DeMarco, Jutta Demeler, Dan Deming, Jane Deming, Thomas Demogines, Paul Denev, Peter Denev, Camille Denholme, Eugenia DeNieto, Francesco DePasquale, Bertrand DePetigny, Marie-Therese DePetigny, Carole DeRoo, Charles Deschambury, Daniel Descombaz, Andree DeThiersant, Andre Dettieri, Justa DeVilliers, Pino Devitini, Candace Devoe, Chuck Devoe, Eloy Dewey, Albert Dewisme, David DeZelle, Anna Di Lorenzo, Anna Di Meo, Antonio Di Gioia Bob Di Diego, Antonio Diaz, Barbara Diaz, Pat Didear, Rosemary Didear, Carlo DiFrancesco, Sergio DiFrancesco, Antonio DiGoia, Tina Dillard, Julia Dimmock, Dana Dineen, Anita Dingler, Raul Dingler, Thomas DiPaola, Loren Dirks, Claes Ditleusen, Else-Marie Ditleusen, Claes Ditlevsen, Bruno Divitini, Dan DiVito, Janet Dixon, Dusan Djukich, Michael Dlack, Bruce Dobin, Forrest Dockery, Eddie Dodd, Linda Doering, Willy Doestschman, Sass Doetschmann, Willy Doetschmann, David Dolan, Mary Dolan, Paul Dolan, Mike Dolbaczuk, Karin Don Braber, Graham Donavan, Angelo Donghia, Christa Donker, Graham Donovan, Cecile Donze, Therese Donze, Karen Doobi, Mercedes Dorelia, Anna Dorigo, Elen Dorset, Ellen Dorsett, Eugenio Dos-Santos, Denyse Doudan, Alan Douglas, Jim Douglas, Joan Douglas, Richard Douglas, Robert Drake, Chris Dresser, Robin Drimmer, Ronnie Drimmer, Mitchell Drobbin, Jeff Drumm, Veronique DuBellay, Horst Dubiel, Dennis Dubin, Stan Dubin, Martin Dubow, Bob Duggan, Tom Duggan, Bob Duggin, Helene Dugmore, Georgette Dumas, Scott Duncan, Joe Duncanson, Joseph Duncanson, Lindy Duncanson, Ann Dunev, Camille Dunholme, Jean-Jacques Dunki, James Dunn, Brigitte Duquesne, Francoise Durand, Dave Durnan, Jurgen Durnberger, Peter Durnil, Corrie Dutko, Brenda Dyer, Trevor Eade, Dick Eastin, John Eastment, Edna Eaton, Lolita Echavarria, Fred Eckfeld, Lilliane Eckharter, Margaret Eckold, Tina Eckstein, Anders Eckwell, Eve Eden, Donna Edison, Steve Edison, Ellen Edmondson, Eloise Edmonson, Louise Edmunson, Luis Eduardo Cuello, Carlton Edwards, Deborah Edwards, Harold Edwards, Darlene Eggen, Dean Eggen, Jerry Ehrlich, Debbie Ehst, Ilse Eich, Alexander Einkhour, Jay Eisenbach, Else-Brith Ekstrom, Roland Ekstrom, Maria Elana Nunez, Maria Elena Martini, Amy Elliot, Hugh Elliot, Kay Elsner, Catherine Emard, Philip Embick, Susan Embick, Pat Emery, Tucker Emmett, Susan Emory, Shahab Emran, Shahab Emrani, David Ender, Edi Ender, Sabine Ender, Christine Engler, Thomas Engler, Walter Erb, Lothar Erdtmann, Nena Erdtmann, Ramses Erdtmann, Gert Eriksson, Gunilla Eriksson, Enrique Espinosa, Juan Espinoza, Christopher Estey, Tina Estey, Carol Estrada, Julio Estrada, Beverley Ettinger, Wendy Ettricks, Gus Evans, Noel Evans, Suzanne Evans, Virginia Fair, Andre Fakir, Tony Falcaro, Steve Falcy, Caroline Falone, David Farca Lorna Farca, Raquel Farca, Franco Farina, Jana Farr, Valerie Fasnakis, Floriana Fassi, Gianfranco Fassi, Marina Favilla, Marino Fazi, Marisa Fazi, Stephen Fedele, Dennis Feeney, Eloisa Feeney, Axel Fehling, Liv Fehn, Maria-Luisa Feirrara, Leon Feldbrill, Maria Feldman, Sikica Feldman, Caroline Felons, John Fenton, Enrico Fermi, Slvador Fernanderz, Salvador Fernandez Herrero, Juan Fernandez, Salvator Fernandez, Jose Ferrano, Juan Ferrara, Vivian Ferrara, Bruno Ferrari, Mario Ferrari, Rosar

ia Ferrario, Robert Ferrarro, Lourdes Ferreira, Maria Ferreira, Alberto Ferrerro, Linda Ferry, Lynn Ferry, Richard Ferry, Steven Ferry, Cindy Feshbach, Kathy Feshbach, Lynn Feshbach, Matthew Feshbach, Sheryle Festa, Ron Fiandaca, James Fiducia, Margrit Fierz, Angel Figueroa, Fred Filios, Robin Filios, Giusy Filippini, Renata Filippini, Betty Filisky, robert Filisky, Beatrice Findlay, David Findlay, Lena Findlay, Bill Findley, Bob Fine, Elena Fine, Mike Fine, Robert Fine, Mary Finley, Hans-Peter Fischer, Dianne Fisher, Joan Fisher, Leslie Fisher, Gary Fishman, Patrice Fishman, Jonny Fjall, Jim Flahive, Bob Flanagan, Dave Fleershoff, Debby Flemming, John Flemming, Mary Float, Irma Flores, Walter Flosser, Willi Flosser, Luigi Fogazzi, Leslie Foglesong, John Foglio, Ed Fomby, Astrid Fontana, Gerald Foos, Bob Forrest, Nancy Forrest, David Forsman, Suzanne Fortin, Fabio Fortunat, Sarina Foster, Christian Fouche, Rex Fowler, Jonathan Fox, Marsha Fox, Russell Fox, Marie France Carpentier, Albert Franceschetti, Clara Franceschetti, Maria Franceschinelli, Alessandra Franchi, Maria Franchini, Carlo Francisco, Fabrizio Francomano, Veronica Francomano, vincente Francomano, Jim Frankel, Massimo Franzoni, Neil Fraser, Susana Frederick, Judy Freedman, Rosy Freihoff, Bertha Frias, Roxanne Friend, Hanne Fries, Fabio Frigerio, Thomas Frigge, Harry Frisch, Nancy Frisch, Helen Fritsch, Arda Froese, Diane Froese, Linda Frommer, Greg Frost, Claude Froute, Mary Fry, Rafael Fuentes, Valerie Fuetris, Hamida Fuiatti, Debra Fuller, Terry Fuller, Wayne Fuller, Graziano Fumari, Dudo Func, Richard Furbish, Geoff Fushi, Geoffrey Fushi, Jim Futris, John Futris, Gunther Gafton, Phillipe Gaille, Sheila Gaiman, Linda Galardo, Bianca Galbiati, Giancarlo Galbiati, David Gale, Marie Gale, Jose-Luis Galicia Jr, Gisela Galicia, Guillermo Galicia, Jose Galicia, Jose-Luis Galicia, Ernesto Galli, Eugenio Galli, Marilena Galli, Mauricio Galli, Margaret Gallivan, Ursula Gambert, Carmen Gamboa, Alessandro Gangidino, Pino Gangidino, Pino Gangislino, Steve Ganns, Marianne Garatti, Alfred Garbutt, Manuel Garces, Maria Garces, Cecilia Garcia, Ernesto Garcia, Evangelina Garcia, Gisela Garcia, Gladis Garcia, Ignacio Garcia, Jesus Garcia, Martha Garcia, Maria-Pia Gardini, Claire Gardner, Eva Gardner, Lilia Garduno, Benjamin Garner, Trisa Garner, Marc Garnier, Alicia Garrido, Gloria Garrido, Dolores Garriga, Manuel Gartces Linda Garver, Celia Garza, Laura Garza, Nadina Garza, Nadine Garza, Jane Gatliff, Gary Gatliffe, Eduardo Gatti, Fabrizio Gatti, Luciana Gatti, Chantal Gauthier, Harvey Gauthier, Luisa Gavazzi, Adelio Gaviraghi, Elena Gaviraghi, Fabrizio Gaviraghi, Paul Gawrello, Larry Geis, Malcom Gellatly, Barb Gendusa, Barbara Gendusa, Angelo Gentile, Martino Gentile, Marianne Genton, Antoine Geoffre, Kitty Georgius, Ken Gerbino, Victoria Gerbino, Peter Gerhards, Chris Gerson, Jan Gerson, Stan Gerson, Theresa Gerson, Reto Gfeller, Benjamin Ghiora, Benny Ghiora, Wendy Ghiora, Giovanni Giambarini, Mauro Gianfranco, Sergio Giannini, Dave Gibbons, Anne Giblin, Ingrid Gibson, Cathy Giesecke, Ellen Giffin, Irma Giger, Felipe Gil, Sandra Gil, Linda Gilbert, Louise Gilbert, Richard Gilbert, Steve Gilbert, William Gillette, Per Ginge-Nielsen, Giovanni Giocamezzi, Angelia Gioffre Angela Gioffre, Massimo Giordanengo, Luisa Giovanna Bellagamba, Fabio Giovannelli, Linda Giovanni, Phil Giovinco, Giorgio Girardi, Ernst Girnus, Allan Giroler, Alfredo Gironella, Antonio Gironella, Luisa Gissi, Luisa Gissy, Lorenzo Gizzarelli, Michelle Gizzi, Kurt Glassel, Anne Glenski, Bernadette Glenski, Alba Gloor, Greg Gloor, Lois Gloor, Albert Glow, Franziska Glur, Giorgio Gobbi, Sandra Godding, Tom Godfrey, Vivian Godfrey, Peter Godwin, Georgio Goffe, Alberto Goffy, Giorgio Goffy, Gerri Golashesky, Calla Gold, Marshall Goldblatt, Eden Golden, Emily Goldfield, Steve Goldfield, Lynne Goldstein, Allan Gomery, Mercedes Gomez, Roberto Goncalves, Kay Gonsolin, Ed Gonsoulin, Leona Gonsoulin, Carlos Gonzales, Leon Gonzales, Lillian Gonzales, Lou Gonzales, Maria Gonzales, Monica Gonzales, Penny Gonzales, Pilar Gonzales, Raoul Gonzales, Rom Gonzales, Silvana Gonzales, Susana Gonzales, Alvaro Gonzalez, Luis Gonzalez, Oscar Gonzalez, Pilar Gonzalez, John Good, Kevin Good, Marianne Good, Sherry Good, Randy Goode, Ann Gordin, Anne Gordin, Dawn Gordon, Gerald Gordon, Jerry Gordon, Gabriele Gordt, Emilia Gorini, Edward Goss, Rose Goss, Liane Gottwald, Hank Gould, Mark Gould, Sylvain Goulet, Christian Gounord, Daniele Gounord, Ignacio Gracia, Robert Graf, Jill Graham, Eva Gramm, Alba Grande, Alfonso Grande, Maurizio Grande, Carlo Granito, Theo Grant, Thoe Grant, Alicia Gray, Bob Gray, Maria Grazia Rocco, Linda Graziano, Anita Grechi, Betty Green, Jane Greenberg, Martin Greenberg, Marty Greenberg, John Greene, Maurice Greene, Peter Greene, Jayne Greenwalt, Anita Gregory, Kathy Gregory, Scott Gregory, Anne Greig, Mark Greisen, Simon Grenier, Anne Grieg, Nancy Griffith, Cristina Groenewold, Ricardo Groenewold, Cristina Groenwold, Jaime Groesbeck Michael Grope, Dominique Gropper, Carla Grossbohlin, Harry Grossbohlin, Larry Grout, Cathy Grown, Wilmie Gruber, Bertha Guadalajara, Mariani Gualtiero, Marianne Gubeli, Pierre Guenette, Lauri Guerin, Antonieta Guerrero, Francisca Guerrero, Irma Guerrero, Maria Guerrero, Virginia Guerrero, Anne-Marie Guertin, Duncan Guertin, Diana Guillen, Javier Guillen, jaime Guillertin, Brigitta Gustafsson, Brigitte Gutermann, Rolf Gutermann, Giuliana Gutierrez, Javier Gutierrez, Veronica Gutierrez, Peter Guy, Victor Guzman, Steve Guzzetta, Enza Guzzo, Helga Habiger, Gisela Hackenjos, Holger Hackenjos, Marie Hadjian, Jill Hagen, Diane Hahn, Helgard Hahn, Ernst Haible, Gali Halamish, Dave Haldy, Bob Hall, Cindy Hall, Betty Halliday, Lisa Halverson, Susan Hamady, Bob Hamilton, Edward Hamlyn, Ted Hamlyn, Michael Hancock, Lynne Haney, Michael Haney, Wally Hanks, Bill Hanley, Stina Hans, Henning Hansen, Wiebke Hansen, Eve Hanson, Janet Hanson, Larry Hanson, Lawrence Hanson, Randy Hanson, Margaret Hardy, Charlotte Harness, Connie Harris, Oliver Harris, Roger Harrison, Sioux Hart, Gunter Hass, Wenche Haugen, Lynn Hauptman, Bob Hay, Steven Hayes, Steve Head, Tom Head, Gary Hedge, Janet Hedge, Elisabeth Hedinger, Robert Hedinger, Peter Heer, Betsy Heess, Barbara Hegetschweiler, Helmut Heinzel, Mary Heldt, Katie Heller, Nina Helms, Jean Helpert, Monika Helpert, Berenice Hemsani, Moises Hemsani, Bev Henderson, Diane Henderson, Michael Henderson, Craig Hendrick, Jack Henessey, Bill Henley, Tim Henley, Robin Hennessy, Hans Henriksen, Cyril Henry Holman, Keren Hepner, Randy Hepner, Enrique Hernandez, Isabel Hernandez, Madalena Hernandez, Maria Hernandez, Martha Hernandez, Robert Hernandez, Mario Herold, Janet Herring, Norman Herring, Nan Herst, Pam Hertz, Axel Hesse, Anette Hevillon, Martha Higareda, Jim Highsmith, Saul Hildebrand, Jonathan Hill, Patricia Hillard, Sonia Hines, Robert Hinson, Peggy Hitchman, Tony Hitchman, Eva Hitz, Andy Hoare, Joe Hochman, Edith Hodgskinson, Edith Hodgson, Margaret Hodkin, Terry Hodosi, Hans Hodosy, Terry Hodosy, Otmar Hofer, Lucie Hoffmann, Rose Hogg, Doug Hoisington, Paula Hoisington, Debby Holder, Alan Hollander, Janet Hollander, Karen Hollander, Mimi Holm, Steven Holmes, Fred Holtby, Frederick Holtby, Ursula Holub, Gilles Homier, Francoise Hooks, Vera Hopkins, Joel Hord, Cynthia Horton, Dale Horton, Bill Horwich, Fred Houck, Guy Houston, Karen Howard, Bill Howey, David Howson, Faith Hudon, Faith Hudson, Ana Huelva, Debbie Hughes, Greg Hughes, Harriette Hughes, Peter Hughes, Rick Hull, Sherene Hull, Paul Hulme, Debbie Hulthen, Deborah Hulthen, Leena Hungerbuhler, Fred Hunt, Midge Hunt, Peter Hunt, Beatrice Hunziger, Peter Hunziker, Elena Hurtado, Nicolas Hurtado, Jane Hutchins, June Hutchins, Fawn Hutton, Marilyn Hydie, Jeff Hyland, Ellen Hyrne, Seija Hytonen, Sharon Imburgia, Mavis Imra, Barbara Inbody, Bob Inbody, Werner Indermuhle Deborah Indursky, Michael Ingbar, Renato Ingenito, Judith Irons, Judy Irons, Lynn Irons, Anne Isabelle, Anna Iverson, Jim Jackson, Brigitte Jacobi, Michael Jacobi, Dan Jacobs, Myrna Jacobs, Paul Jaconello, Albert Jacquier, Ariane Jacquier, Hamida Jafferji

, Elias Jafif, Sandra Jager, Henry Jaggers, Mary Jane Luniewski, Bernt Janssen, Carmen Jaramillo, Keith Jarrett, Luisa Javier, Sally Jeans, Georg Jecel, David Jelley, Molly Jelley, Dane Jenkins, John Jennings, Barbara Jensen, Britta Jensen, Craig Jensen, Mary Jensen, Sally Jensen, Karen Jepson, Alexandra Jimenez, Claudia Jimenez, Javier Jimenez, Manuel Jimenez, Ramon Jimenez, Raoul Jimenez, Gust Johanesson, Wendel Johanesson, Hakan Johansson, Peter John, Berenice Johnson, Brent Johnson, Bruce Johnson, Jay Johnson, Jervis Johnson, Judy Johnson, Larry Johnson, Mark Johnson, Richard Johnson, Stacia Johnson, steve Johnson, Tyrone Johnson, Andrew Johnston, DeDe Johnston, Drew Johnston, Terry Johnston, Evelyn Johnstone, Lisa Johonnsesson, Lisa Johonnsson, Mark Jonathan Kloss, Debbie Jones, Iain Jones, Mark Jones, Robin Jones, Henning Jorck, Peter Jorck, Andrea Jordan, Paul Joseph, Claudia Joss, Danielle Jossi, Carol Joyal, Carolyn Judd, Karen Judkin, Hans Juel, Claudia Jugo, Diane Jullian, Abby Juneau, Michael Juneau, Mike Juneau, Unice Juneau, Andre Jurt, James Justice, Suzanne Justus, Alan Juvonen, Allan Juvonen, Susan Juvonen, Magda Kahanu, David Kahn, Mary Kahn, Barbara Kalergis, Bob Kalergis, James Kalergis, Carla Kammer, Gloria Kamph, Magda Kanahu, Rory Kaplan, Cheryl Kapuler, Mauri Karger, Michael Karger, Susan Karnovsky, Lamia Kashoghi, Carlo Katchi, Eurlich Katschzmann, Ulrich Katzschmann, Emil Kauer, Emile Kauer, Hugo Kaufmann, Mary Kaufmann, David Kaup, Bob Kaye, Robert Kaye, David Keat, Jamie Keavic, Dietmar Kecht, Goerge Keck, Gary Keenan, Guy Keenan, Jeanne Keenan, Richard Keeney, Grace Kefover, Patrick Kegel, John Keldami, Ingrid Keller, Alan Kellman, Kathy Kemmerer, Steve Kemp, Klaus Kempe, Marieta Kempe, Bonnie Kempner, Rudi Kempner, Robert Kenny, Carla Kent Grossbohlin, James Keppler, Kifumi Keppler, Stefan Kerber, John Kerr, Kitty Kerr, Naomi Kerr, Vivien Kerslake, Marianne Kessler, Denis Keyes, Ike Kezsbom, Peter Khaled, Christopher Kight, Bruno Kihm, Bill Kilpatrick, Kyung Kim, Scott Kimball, Sharon Kimball, Ivy Kimmich, Michael King Hancock, Eddie King, Fred King, Frederick King, Isabel King, Liz King, Susi Kinglefuss, Carol Kingsley, Siegfried Kiontke, Carmine Kischke, Christine Kischke, helen Kitchen, Helen Kitchin, Andrew Kitt, Andy Kitt, Any Kitt, Tara Kitt, John Kitzinger, Jens Kjeldsen, Niels Kjeldsen, Ken Klaebe, Monroe Kleiderman, Andreas Klein, Barry Klein, Jan Klein, Janet Klein, Naomo Klein, Martha Kleinbaum Lolita Kleinbaum, Ricardo Kleinbaum, Rosita Kleinbaum, Ruben Kleinbaum, Salvador Kleinbaum, Richard Kleinberg, Naomi Kleyn, Sandra Kleyn, Heidi Klinger, Michael Klinger, Gad Klopstock, Yaffa Klopstock, yaffa Klopstock, Sharon Kloss, Andrea Kluge, Dave Kluge, Housi Knecht, Nancy Kneighten, Angie Knewitz, Elsa Knewitz, Elvira Knewitz, Nancy Knighten, Ruth Knudsen, Emilio Kobeh, Andi Koch, Andres Koch, Christa Koch, Elizabeth Kochsiek, Walter Koenig, Walter Kolabruski, Felix Kolla, Klaus Koller, Emilie Kong, Martha Korringa, Wouter Korringa, Juliane Kostinger, Hans-Peter Kotzli, Dick Kraman, Jayne Kraman, Roswitha Kratz, Rolf Krause, Susan Krause, James Krebsbach, Nancy Kredel, Pam Kresse, Randy Kretchmar, Rene Kristal, Karl Kroeger, Sandy Kroeger, Elizabeth Kroll, Herwig Kroll, Greg Krueger, Daniel Kuhn, Maina Kuhn, Roland Kuhn, Ron Kule, Josef Kunz, Steve Kurth, Tuula Kuusisto, Sandy Kuypers, Iria La Vaccara, Phil La Claire, Michele Labarile, Elena Labarrure, Andre Laberge, Johnny Laboriel, Bob Labre, Nick Labuschagne, Rocky Lackey, Steven Lackey, Richard Lacy, Andy Ladd, Nicole Lafreniere, Connie Lahmann, Simone Laine, Bert Laing, Joachim Laiss, Stevie Lake, Josette Lambert, Giovanni Lamberti Frederica Lambertini, Enzo Lamorgese, Federica Lampronti, Bernardo Lan, Carlos Lan, Jeannie Lan, Miguel Lan, Morris Lan, Sarah Lan, Victorina Landra, Janet Langdon, Gennaro Langella, Andree Langevin, Michael Lanza, Serge Lapointe, Thierry Laprevote, Angela Laramea, Charla Larch, Donna LaRock, Elena Larrabure, Miguel Larrabure, Allen Larsen, Alan Larson, Arwen Larson, Janet Larson, Sherry Larson, Christina Larsson, Urban Larsson, Albert Lasala, Finn Lassen, Connie Latch, Lloyd Latch, Brenda Latchman, Pat Lathrom, Marjorie Laughlin, Tom Laughran, Joe Lauricella, Marie-Margrethe Lauritzen, John Laursen, Iria Lavacarra, Angelo Lavazza, Peggy Laverdiere, Andre Lavergnat, Charles Lavin, Joseph Lavin, Janet Lawrence, Greg Layton, Philippe Le Bourveau, Marc leach, Bruce Leavitt, Luis Leceta, Didier LeClercq, Steve Lederman, Carol Lee Womble, James Lee Antoinette Lee, Barbara Lee, Michael Lee, Mike Lee, Sydney Lee, Alain Lefebre, Eva Lefevre, Sam Lefkowitz, Pierre LeFrancois, Alain Lefrancois, Monique Lefrancois, Giuliana Legnani, Merriad Lehman, Monica Lehman, Yves Lehman, Hannes Lehmann, Klaus Lehmann, Meinrad Lehmann, Vivian Leifield, Al Leighton, Carol Leipsic, Ruth Lennie, Bente Lenz, Maurizio Lenzi, Ingrid Lenzke, Luis Leon, Ricardo Leon, Marsha Leone, Fabrizio Leonelli, Ben Leong, Gunter Leonhardt, Sergio Leoni, Gary Lerner, Diane Leroux, Vanella Lesevre, Andrea Lettieri, Tobias Leutenegger, Joe Levin, Johnny Levin, Alvah Levine, Barbara Levine, Daniel Levine, Doris Levine, Caspar Levman, Jan Levy, Sam Levy, Stew Levy, Barbara Lewis, Carita Lewis, Donna Lewis, James Lewis, Laura Lewis, Michael Lewis, Myron Lewis, Norman Lewis, Ronald Lewis, Victor Lidchi, Maria Lienert, Janet Light, Mari-Ann Lind, Per Lindberg, Ole Lindell, Christina Lindroth, Artur Lindskog, Virginia Lindskog, Michael Lindström, Lenny Lindstrom, Michael Lindstrom, Lil Linson, David Lipchitz, Elizabeth Lippert, Lee Lippert, Heidi Lipscher, Juraj Lipscher, Albert Lipschutz, Mireille Lipschutz, Ken Lipton, Francesco Locilento, Frnaco Locilento, Jurg Locker, Rachel Lockwood, Maria Lodovici, Mario Lodovici, Leona Logan, Beatrix Lohman, Claus Lohmann, Leonardo Loi, Robert Lolln, Salvatore Lombardo, Desiree Long, Steve Longbotham, Joan Lonstein, Joan Loosli, Angel Lopez, Juan-Baptista Lopez, Leticia Lopez, Charla Lorch, Pier-Angelo Loreggia, Bill Lorentzen, Vikki Lorentzen, Carlos Lores, Michel Loron, Christi Losh, Mary Losty, Albert Lotz, Bjorn Lotz, Trey Lotz, Marlys Lotzer, Jan Loup Gilliot, Krystyna Louw, Anita Lowe, Jill Lowe, Madeline Lowe, Susan Lowe, Bernie Lowenstein, Grace Lowrance, Maria Lozano, Borghild Lozio, Nicola Lozio, Henry Lubbe, Harry Lucas, Nick Lucchesi, Hannelore Luck, Beth Ludwig Beth Ludwig, Patrick Lue Fan, Carlo Lugli, Claudio Lugli, Maria Lugli, Renata Lugli, Jerry Lull, Steve Lund, Conny Lundberg, Betty Lunde, Borje Lundgren, Anita Lundstedt, Mary-Jane Luniewski, Ron Luniewski, Ronald Luniewski, Paolo Luoni, Tarcisio Luoni, David Luscombe, Christian Lussi, Ernie Lutz, Hania Lux, Sally Lyn Zwan, June Lynch, Mary Lynne Wolfe, Bobby Lyons, Bruno Maca, Lenny Macaluso, Deanne Macdonald, Debbi Mace, Debbie Mace, Rick MacFarlane Sylvia Machado, Marco Macias, Phyllis Mack, Daniel MacKenzie, Bernadette Macullo, James Madia, Jim Madia, Stephen Mage, Maurizio Maggione, Janine Magnan, Janine Magnan, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Mario Majorski, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, Marco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Lina Majorsky Marc Majorsky, Mario Majorsky, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, M

arco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, Dan Marino, Daniel Marino, Gennaro Marino, Christie Marion, Jessica Marks, Susan Marple, Ray Marquardt, Pura Marquez, carlo Martelli, Carlos Martelli, Diana Martelli, Michele Martelli, Pedro Martin-Moreno, Christina Martinez, Francisco Martinez, Jose Martinez, Lucinda Martinez, Pedro Martinez, Pilar Martinez, Sergio Martinez, Veronica Martinez, Luisella Martini, Marc Marty, Robert Marx, Laura Mason, Mary Mason, Mary-Clare Mason, Dedo Maspero, Giusy Maspero, Patrizio Maspero, Valerio Maspero, Denise Masse, Alessandro Massolo, Donato Masucci, Antonelo Matar, Angela Matarazzo, Antonello Matarazzo, Luis Mateos, Dwight Matheny, Konrad Matt, Leon Matthews, Sue Mattinson, Giorgio Mattioli, Maria Mattioli, Maria-Teresa Mattioli, Pietro Mauro, GianFranco Mauro, Mary Mauser, Thomas Maxwell, Jeanette May, Elena Maya, James Mayer, Jim Mayer, Ulrich Mayer, Ursi Mayer, Regula Mayor, Kate Mays, Todd Mays, Christine Mazarand, Riccardo Mazza, Tito Mazza, Scott Mazzanarella, Elisabetta Mazzorato, Evangelina Mazzorato, Loris Mazzorato, Vincenzo Mazzoratto, Rose McAffee, Pam McCall, Mary McCarran, Mike McCaudles, Peter McCord, Carlynn McCormick, John McCormick, Margee McCormick, Rod McCormick, Gwen McCoy, Michael McCoy, Mick McCoy, Joseph McCusker, Janice McDaniels, Janice McDannel, Carolann McDonald, Michael McDonald, Shannon McDougall, Gill McEnery, Robert McFarlane, Jeff McGee, Lee McGee, Tom McIntyre, David McKee, Thomas McKee, Dennis McKenna, Mark McKenna, Breck McKinley, Jean McKinnon, Terry McKnee, Beth McLeod, Kenny McLeod, Debbie McNeely, Gerald McNeely, Jerry McNeely, Mario McQuade, Simon Meadmore, Gisela Medina, Lee Meekcoms, Karen Megan, Giovanna Megna, Jeannette Meier, Ursi Meier, Paolo Meini, Bob Meinsma, Betsy Melchior, Tim Melchior, Claire Melgren, david Melis, Alexia Melocchi, Al Melone, Penny Melrose Fernando Mena, Brigitte Meneau, Raquel Menoa, Guy Mercier, May Meriwether, Stefania Merlino, Clarisse Meschoulam, Tom Messick, Helen Meuley Ract, Alex Meyer, Christine Meyer, Otto Meyer, Ursi Meyer, jackie Meyers, Jacquellyn Meyers, Francoise Michaillet, Ron Michalski, Louis Michel Brolles, Lana Micheletti, Lina Micheletti, Tony Milan, Renato Milani, Uwe Millan, Gil Miller, Tina Miller, Karen Milligan, Rick Milner, Terry Milner, Gisella Minacci, Tudy Ming, Jacqueline Mingard, Peter Miranda, Loretta Miscavige, Ron Miscavige, Joe Miskowiecz, Paul Missonis, Tess Mobilia, Lucio Modegna, Joe Modica, Gunter Mohl, Rudi Mohl, Antonello Moi, Vera Moklowya, Paolo Molini, Don Moll, Fritz Mollman, Brigitta Mollmann, Kurt Molman, Jacky Molnar, Theo Molten, Charles Momsen, Greg Montangero, Susanne Montangero, Luisa Montero, Vicky Montesinos, Vito Montini, Vittorio Montini, Ed Mooney, Pat Mooney, Art Moore, Brigid Moore, Bruce Moore, David Moore, Peter Moore, Wendy Moose, Jose-Luis Morales, Paul Morel, Pablo Moreno, Tas Morfopoulos, Jeaninne Morissette, Angela Moro, Livia Morone, Loreno Moroni, Magda Morra, Brian Morrell, Silvana Morri, Kathy Morrill, Patricia Morrill, Terry Morrill, Bob Morris, Deborah Morris, Faye Morris, Gloria Morris, Mavis Morrison, Karen Morrissett, Carol Morse, David Morse, Joan Mort, Cecilia Mortano, Mina Moschini, Mildred Moscona, Lauren Moseley, Cathy Moss, Kathy Moss, Ron Moss, Lena Moufarej, Linan Moufarres, Art Mould, Richard Moulton, David Mowbray, david Mowbray, Roger Mueller, Walter Mueller, Elly Muller, fred Muller, Josef Muller, Peter Muller, Robert Muller, Roger Muller, Walter Muller, Jean-Christophe Mulliez, Javier Munoz Carmen Munoz, Hector Munoz, Javier Munoz, Alejandra Munro, Klaus Munz, Evelyn Murdock, Dan Murillo, Peter Murphy, Jerry Murray, Marvin Murray, Pat Murray, Barbara Musach, Bob Musack, Janice Myerberg, Paul Myerberg, Beth Nabors, Betyh Nabors, Lorena Nacif, Linda Nadir, Bill Nagengast, Judy Nagengast, Douglas Nagy, Mike Napier, Ed Naranjo, Antonio Narcisco, Cecilia Nascimento, Silvia Nascimento, Anne Nash, Bob Nastas, Claudio Natale, Marco Natale, Silvia Natale, Silvio Natale, Orlando Navarro, Patricia Navarro, Ann Naylor, Darrel Naylor, Astrid Neal, James Neal, Ron Nedd, Dennis Negley, Wendy Negley, Linda Neilson, Robert Neilson, Pamela Nelson, Donna Nemier, Art Nermiah, John Ness, Douglas Neuman, Rebecca Neuman, Gloria Neumeyer, Walter Neuschitzer, Herman Newkirk, Josh Newkirk, Alex Newman, Anita Newman, Arnold Newman, Becky Newman, Buzz Newman, John Newman, Mark Newman, Mary Newman, Phil Newman, Steve Newman, Willie Newman, Edith Nichols, Carol Nickols, John Nickols, Anne Nielsen, Bob Nielson, Celia Niemerow, Guillermo Nietes, Norma Nieto, Oscar Nieves, Ruth Nighswonger, Franco Nigro, Meryl Nilsson, Betty Nimger, Christian Nissen, Christian Nitart, Claude Nitart, Brodie Noeske, Rodie Noeske, Robert Nordlund, Thomas Nordlund, Robert Nordstrom, nadine Normal, Michael Norris, Mike Norris, Nadia North, Derrick Northcross, Gianfranco Notari , John Novello, Norm Novitsky, Mark Noyes, Bruna Nucci, Richard Nuccio, Jeff Nuckols, John Nuckols, Steve Nuckols, Judy Nugent, Antonio Nunes, Ann Nunez, Carlos Nunez, Jose Nunez, Maria-Elena Nunez, Mario Nunez, Jose-Luis Nuno, Manfred Nussle, Maria Nutgeren, David Nutter, Sally Nutter, Tom Nyerges, Elaine O’Connell, Kevin O’Donnell, Maryann O’Donnell, Melissa O’Hara, Steve O’Hara, Maureen O’Keefe, Kieran O’Leary, Peter Obolensky, Hugo Ocalo, Steven Ogmon, Therese Oliva, Barbara Oliver, Joy Ollemans, Dolores Olmos, Geri Olson, Giuseppe Onesti, Michel Oneyron, Churlya Ong Wurfel, Enrico Opipari, Luisa Opipari, Giuseppe Oresti, Luisa Orlandini, Umberto Orlandini, Pilar Orozco, Dolores Ortiz, Jesus Ortiz, Veronica Orvananos, Hazel Osborne, Mario Osborne, Mike Osborne, Rick Osborne, Carol Osinaga, Inger Ostlund, Vega Ostlund, Peter Otanjac, Patrick Ouellette, Bill Owen, Brooke Owen, Dan Owen, James Owen, Jim Owen, Michael Owen, Nancy Owen, Robert Pace, Adrian Padilla, Ariel Padva, Robert Page, Mary-Jo Pagel, Per Pagh, Rebecca Pagovich, Paula Paiewonsky, Mauricio Palacios, Chris Palmer, Garnet Palmer, Margie Palmer, Dario Pandolfi, Alessandra Panigalli, Roberto Panigalli, Jennifer Pantermuehl, Daniela Paolini, Paolo Paolini, Pietro Paolini, Daniele Paoloni, George Papaheraklis, Juan Paredes, Louise Parent, Serge Parent, Floriana Paris, Anna Parise, Beverly Park, Margaret Parke, Phillip Parke, Debbie Parker, James Parker, Francois Parmentier, Nancy Parodi, Pat Parodi, Stephen Parodi, Bennett Parrish, Helen Parselle, Jeanine Pasche, Ron Patella, Jo Patti, Bonnie Paull, Cindy Payer, Beatrice Payne, Graham Payne, Chip Payson, Sheri Payson, Jose-Luis Paz, Colleen Peabody, Dee Pearson, Dee-Dee Pearson, Delores Pearson, Rosie Peck, Sally Peck, Ernie Pecoraro, Nydia Pecoraro, Robert Pedersen, Karen Pedre, Patrizia Pedroza, Heidi Peens, Louis Peens, Antonella Peghin, Patrizia Pelizzari , Sylvie Pelletier, Andree Peloquin, Anne Peloquin, Diane Peloquin, Guy Peloquin, Michel Peloquin, Hector Pena, Fred Penna, Jeanette Penwell, David Percival, Antonio Perez, Arturo Perez, Elisa Perez, Jose Perez, Samuel Perez, Dennis Pero, Giugliana Peroni, Eliana Perotti, Silvio Perotti, Genevieve Perrin, Steven Perrin, Alessandra Pesce, Gisella Pesce, Silvia Pestiddo, Lynn Peters, Kifumi Peterson, Bradford Petit, Pino Petrotto, Angelo Petruolo, Marzia Pezzali, Don Pfendler, Linda Phillip, Christine Phillips, Diane Phillips, Michael Phillips, Maria Pia Gardini, Pier Piaceri, Laura Piazza, Lucio Piazza, Enzo Piccone, Isella Piccone, Patricia Piccone, George Pick Geoffrey Pick, Jean Pierre Deleze, Jean Pierre Lehman, Luciano Pietrobuoni, Giuseppe Pietrobuono, George Pilat, Irit Pillo, Bernard Pimont, Giovanni Pin

chietti, Claire Pinelli, Gustavo Pinto, Katharina Piotrowski, Colleen Piper, Collen Piper, Claire Pirelli, Alain Pitre, Letizia Pizzi, Dominic Pizzinat, Veronique Pizzinat, Ariel Podva, Daniel Podva, Marie-Louise Podva, Beatrice Pogouch Armando Pogoush, Dieter Pohlmann, Manuel Poiatti, Jean Poitras, Carl Polk, Dan Polk, Mireille Pollack, Fay Pollard, Ina Pollins, Mario Polverini, Maurizio Polverini, Bruce Pomaville, Martha Pomroy, martha Pomroy, Angelo Ponchetti, Maria-antonieta Ponchetti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchetti, Giovanni Ponchietti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchietti, Dick Pool, Cal Poole, Calvin Poole, Mark Poole, Fred Pope, Hermann Poppinga, Hans-Jorge Porner Claude Portais, Joanne Porter, Carlos Portillo, Paula Portmann, Joanne Portner, Graham Potter, Jack Potter, Christian Pouliot, Maria Pozzebon, Priscilla Presley, Leonie Price, Paul Price, Rosa Prieto, Clay Primrose, Earl Prince, Marty Prince, Nicolas Prince, Bruce Pringle, Carlyn Pringle, Carolyn Pringle, Daniela Prior, Tommy Pritzkau, Antonella Prosali, Massimo Prosperi, Peter Przybylla, Pia Pskowski, Hamida Puatti, Susana Puente, Marco Pugelli, Luisella Pugliatti, Hamida Puiatti, Wayne Pullen, Lee Purcell, Betsy Putterman, Larry Putterman, Michel Puzzolante, Sigrun Quetes, Rod Quinn, Bolivar Quinones, Francisco Quiroz, Ken Rabey, Nornie Rabey, Pat Rabey, Sheri Rabey, Janice Racheff, Jerry Racheff, Norma Rachel Brian Rackham, Helene Ract, Orelio Radaelle, Oreste Radaelli, Silvio Radaelli, Jerald Radroblo, Ron Radstrom, Leon Raffoul, Erika Rail, Rob Rainer, Aino Raisanen, Mauno Raisanen, Jaakko Raita, Pirjo Ramberg, Graciela Ramirez, Jaimes Ramirez, Lidia Ramirez, Norma Ramirez, Jose Ramon Amondarain, Eduardo Ramos, Giovanni Rampazzo, Mauro Rangeloni, Michel Raoust, Farhad Raschidi, Heidi Raschidi, Victoria Rashidi, Bruce Raston, Keith Raymond, Sandy Raymond, Joe Reaiche, Serge Rebeillard, Nelia Redondo, Nena Redtmann, Jan Regan, Sissy Reginato, Gayle Rego, Jim Rego, Marian Reguera, Sherwood Reichard, Brian Reichenberg, Helmut Reichert, Jean Reid, Gerhard Reile, Kathy Reilly, Eric Reinertaen, Felix Reinhard, Liliane Reinhard, Felix Reinhardt, Maggie Reinhart, David Reinken, Bruno Reisch, Richard Reiss, Manfred Renker, Gerard Renna, Karen Renna, Ian Rennie, Ann Rentachler, Lisa Rentschler, Brian Reso, Joan Reso, Michel Reveillere, Odile Reveillere, Virginia Rex, Edelia Reyes, Gino Reyes, Olivia Reyyes, Emil Rhodes, Mary Ribero, Gay Ribisi, Giuseppina Riccardi, Duane Rice, Mischa Rice, Arlene Rich, Frances Rich, Gary Rich, gary Rich, John Rich, Jean Richardson, Dan Richier, Harry Rickard, Dee-Dee Riechel, Frank Riemer, Paul-Unko Rieter, Nicola Rinaldi, Barbara Rinder, Ian Rinder, Jan Rinder, Crister Ringkvist, Fernando Rios, Gian-Luigi Ripamonti, Patricia Ripetta, Michael Rischer, Giancarlo Rivolta, Giovanna Rizetti, Giovanni Rizza, Carol Rizzardini, Giovanna Rizzetti, Costanzo Robasto, Francisco Robasto, Silvano Robasto, Don Roberts, Donald Roberts, Gracia Roberts, Lynn Roberts, Suzanne Roberts, Hunter Robertson, James Robertson, Maggie Robertson, Marguerite Robin, Allison Robinson, Mary Robinson, Myron Robinson, Patrick Robinson, Robbie Robinson, Dan Robison, Jose Robles, Ricardo Robotton, Francisco Rocha, Rene Rochat, Kathleen Roche, Kathy Roche, Craig Rocheau, Norma Rochelle, Michael Rock Mike Rock, Bonnie Rockwell, Jean Rockwell, Ginger Rodeghero, Linda Rodgers, Tony Rodgers, Jose RodriGuez, Susan RodriGuez, Antonia Rodriguez, Juan-Salas Rodriguez, Martin Rodriguez, Noemi Rodriguez, Gina Rogers, Mimi Rogers, Rick Rogers, Pablo Rohrig, Sabine Rohrig, Helena Rojo, Dennis Roland, Doc Roland, Kay Roland, Kaye Roland, Len Roland, Riccardo Romanini, Romano Romanini, Tiziana Romanini, Claudio Romano, Laura Romano, Patrizia Romano, Jose Romeo, Jose-Manuel Romero, Rocio Romero, Jorge Roncal, Bruno Ronchi, Ricardo Rosales, Louise Rose, Sandi Rosen, Sandy Rosen, Alain Rosenberg, Alain-Frank Rosenberg, Sarit Rosenberg, Charles Rosenkranz, Allyne Rosenthal, Jean Rosko, Gwen Ross, Ron Ross, Rino Rossetti, Alessandro Rossi, Giorgio Rossi, Christian Rossini, Marianne Rossini, Riccardo Rosso, Harry Rostig, Sandra Rostig, Marco Rota, Alon Roth, Bernard Roundhill, Karen Rounds, Cristina Roveyaz, Elaine Rowles-Poole, Susan Royal, Kristina Royce, Richard Royce, Jaime Ruane, Pat Rubey, Michael Rubin, Sy Rubin, Bet Ruddell, Steven Ruddell, Alfons Ruegg, Alfonse Ruegg, Gery Ruegg, Sleven Ruggiero, Guido Ruiu Hector Ruiz, Roberto Ruiz, Linda Rule, Giovanni Rusconi, Sara Russo, Margaret Rutherford, Susan Ryan Eastin, Gerard Ryan, Howard Ryan, Joan Ryan, Corry Ryke, Tony Ryke, Bernardo Sacchi, Bianca Sacchi, Vittorio Sacchi, Doug Sadwick, Douglas Sadwick, Nancy Sadwick, Fernando Sakuray, Marco Salame, Russell Salamon, Kenneth Salazar, Oscar Saldarriaga, Andres Saldivar, Tom Saliga, Mauricio Salinas, Ritva Salmela, Leon Salsberg, Matty Salsberg, Adriana Saltamerenda, Michael Saltz, Landru Salvo, Tony Sampson, Paolo San Agostino, Robert San Filippo, Roberto San Filippo, Alejandar Sanchez, Alejandra Sanchez, Andrea Sanchez, Benites Sanchez, Firmin Sanchez, Gisela Sanchez, Pilar Sanchez, Eileen Sanders, Sunny Sanders, Claude Sandoz, Diana Sandrin, Michel Sansfacon, Paolo Santagostino, Luis Santiago, Pablo Santiago, Alberto Santinato, Mavi Santinato, Graziella Santo, Massimo Santoro, Frances Santos, Hernan Santos, Laura Santos, Roberto Santos, Bonifacio Saponaro, Alberto Sarrocco, Ennio Sarrocco, Mike Savales, Andy Savas, Kathy Savas, Martha Savelo, Saveria Savocchia, Iris Sawtelle, Fabio Scarabelli, Alex Schabes, Volker Schalthoff, Denise Scherer, Guido Scherer, Theo Scherer, Olga Shermayer, Ursula Scherwinzer, Catherine Scherzinger, Denise Scherzinger, Rolf Scherzinger, Clarisse Schmid, Heinz Schmid, Dieter Schmitt, Heide Schnabl, Hermann Schnabl, Susan Schnabli, Anita Schneider, Ingeborg Schneider, Joanne Schnitzer, Ingeborg Schnitzler, Hilda Schoemaker, Paul Scholten, Martin Schonenberger, Jeanne Schrodinger, Hermann Schubotz, Claudia Schuhbock, Inge Schuhbock, Ruth Schuler, Peter Schultz, Dieter Schulz, Joseph Schumacher, Vreni Schurtenberger, Cheryl Schwalbe, Gerhard Schwandt, Carole Schwartz, Joe Schwartz, Pam Schwartz, Robert Schwartz, Judith Schwyter, Giorgio Scialuga, Flavio Sciotti, Jeannie Scoglio, Jeff Scott Jeffrey Scott, Karen Scott, Sonya Scott, Susan Seagal, Jon Sears, Bernadette Segal, Frank Seibert, Rob Seibert, Andy Seidler, George Seidler, Philip Seifleir, Marie Selosse, Jacques Senior, Maria Serato, Vincenzo Servidio, Vincenzo Servilio, Vincenzo Servodio, Jacob Sevilya, John Sexsmith, Mario Sgamarella, Pietro Sgaramelli, Peter Sgroi, Mike Shadowski, Anita Shain Reichenberg, Avishai Shalev, Bill Shannon, Pat Shannon, Hyam Shaull, Wendy Shaw, Rick Sheey, Hanna Shefi, Joanne Shelby, Larry Shelton, Kathy Shepard, Kathy Sheperd, Eric Sherman, Manon Sherman, Martin Sherman, Renee Sherman, Ron Sherwood, Bill Shields, Megan Shields, Chris Shipman, Ilana Shippony, Donald Showalter, Susan Shugart, Gloria Sierra, Joan Sigal, Jan Silber, Marc Silber, Penny Silber, Bruce Silton, Larry Silver, Dennis Simmons, Karen Simons, Tony Simpson, David Singer, Martine Sitbon, Gro Skov, Tina Slack, Benetta Slaughter, David Slaughter, Larry Sliver, David Sloane, Pascal Smakdji, Margaret Smidt Van Gelder, Brian Smith, Dieter Smith, Greg Smith, John Smith, Lena Smith, Louise Smith, Peter Smith, Steven Smith, Jessie Snow, Kathy Snow, Scott Snow, Peter Snyder, Deborah Sobocinski, Lawrence Sobocinski, Flavio Sofia, Tom Solari, Elena Soldati, Liesel Soley, Linda Solomon, Lee Some, Donna Sommer, Ann Sophie Wago, Beatrice Sopprarono, Ronit Soracco, Bengt Sorensen, Daniel Sorensen, Eric Sorensen, Scott Sorensen, Dick Sorenson, Josse-Luis Sosa, Jose-Maria Sousa, Vicki Southard, Maurizio Sozzi, Joe Spencer, John Spencer, Torrey Spencer, Michal Spencer-Smith, Paul Spencer-Smith, Massimiliano Speri, Ann Spielberg, Rick Spies, Jim Spina, Michael Spinelli, Jean Spinner, Fritz Spohn, Maggie Spohn, Bruno Spolenak, Jenny Sprecher, Stephen Spreecher, Luisa Sprefilio Richard Springsteed, Robert Sprungli, David St-Lawrence, Herbert Stahl, Maike-B Stahl, Hansueli Stahli, Darrell Staley, Aldo Stanzani, Roberto Stanzani, Chiara stanzani, Ch

ristina Staples, Peter Staples, Velli Stefneki, Rolf Steimer, Art Stein, Paul Stein, Cathy Steiner, George Steiner, Thomas Steiner, Lewis Steinman, Charles Stephens, George Stermer, Jennifer Stermer, Cheryl Stewart, Donna Stewart, Tony Stewart, Egon Stiebel, Edith Stockli, Ilse Storfer, Paul Storfer, Dan Stover, Joe Stover, Peter Stowes Travis Stracener, Betty Stradford, Dan Stradford, Gene Streett, Anne Strickland, Peter Strickler, Bengt Strom, Jeanine Struchen, Dominique Struder, Jo Struthers, Kathrin Stuckenbrock, Marilyn Stuckli, Brian Sturgeon, David Sturgiss, Gloria Suarez de Romero, Alberto Suarez, Denise Suarez, Maria Suarez, Leo Suchor, Bob Sudalnik, Susanne Sudalnik, Bonnie Sue Krumpe, Michael Suggs, Jon Supak, Margaret Supak, Jurgen Suplit, Libia Susana Calvete, Angela Sushko, Lana Susman, Marie Suter, Max Suter, Betty Sutphin, Herb Sutphin, Christian Svensson, Staffan Svensson, Sherry Swanson, Ralph Swarens, Paul Sweeny, Renee Swisko, Jim Sydejko, Linda Sydejko, Francois Sylvestre, Debbie Taffe, Joseph Taffe, Veikko Taivainen, Peter Talbot, Mitch Talevi, Pierre Tamboise, Harry Taplin, Roberto Tarabini, Serge Tardif, Tania Tarpico, Elena Tarqui, Jaime Tauchi, Berndt Taylor, Bruce Taylor, Claire Taylor, John Taylor, Sue Taylor, Pierre Tedeschi, Sylvie Tedeschi, Jaime Tello, Ralph Temps, Grace Ten Oever, Sax Ten Oever, Carmine Terra, Meri Tertelman, Aline Testa, Gerd Teutsch, Peter Thalmann, Laurent Theberge, Len Their, Marie Therese Meili, Yves Thibodeau, Marc Thies, Ann Thomas, Bob Thomas, David Thomas, Dina Thomas, Laurie Thomas, Meredith Thomas, Miguelle Thomas, Pat Thomas, Serge Thomas, Bruce Thompson, Frank Thompson, Raymond Thompson, Anne Thurston, Fatima Thut, Dottie Tillberg, Tomas Tillberg, Tina Tinbri, Chris Tingley, Alain Tizzioli, Don Tolan, Maureen Tolan, Ildiko Tombolini, Kristin Tomczak, Jacqueline Tomlinson, Stefano Tonellotto, Claudio Toppi, Ernesto Toro, Ricardo Toro, Graciela Torres Graciela Torres, Maria Torres, Miguel Torres, Ricardo Torres, Sergio Torres, Silvia Torres, Giullio Toso, Kader Toumi, Larry Trainor, larry Trainor, John Travolta, Nicole Tremblay, Pierre Tremblay, Daniel Tremblay, Anne-Marie Tremday, Angie Trent, Gian-Paolo Trivella, Gigi Troglio, Dave Tropf, Irv Trudell, Irving Trudell, Gunter Tschauder, Hans-Peter Tschudin, Susi Tschupp, Bill Tucker, Bodil Tucker, Stefan Tunedal, Philip Tunison, Paul Turnbull, Bruce Turner, Nancy Turner, George Turney, Andrea Turroni, Rudiger Tuschen, Catherine Tweed, Rusty Tweed, Vera Tweed, Enrique Ugarte, Maggie Uitz, Francesca Ulivieri, Anette Ungerman, Marian Upton, Alessandro Urbini, Mikel Urizarbarrena, Dario Usai, Franco Useri, Charlie Uslander, Ornella Vaccari, Marco Vaccarone, Mario Vaccarone, Marie-France Vachon, Nola Vains, Antonio Valentini, Hector Valenzuena, Jane Van Pelt, Jone Van Hoecke, Marc Van den Lynde, Michael Van Masters, Timothy Van De Pelt, Victoria Van Harasz, Eden Vanning, Manuel Vargas, Anita Vasquez, Cesar Vasquez, Sergio Vavalle, Jean Vavrus, Anita Vazquez, Frank Vedder, Judy Vedder, Enrique Vega, Manuel Vega, Maria Vega, Fredrich Veit, Manuel Velasco, Maria Velasco, Ricardo Velazquez, Jose Veloz, Diana Venegas, Sam Venti, Velia Vera, Yolanda Vergara, Susan Verger, Angela Vescovi, Norman Vespi, Marc Vianna, Anne Vicino, Elaine Vidal, Tania Vilchez, Tom Villaire, Val Villaluz, Jose Villareal Acosta, Antonieta Villareal, Antono Villareal, Jose Villareal, Maria Villareal, Rodrigo Villareal, Rudolfo Villareal, Jose Villarreal, Charni Vilnar, Angelina Vincent, Sylvie Vincent, Margarita Vinyallonga, Mireya Vinyallonga, Vera Vitale, Lore Vlemmings, Bob Voight, Christie Voight, Jon Voight, Steve Vollum, Giuseppe Volpari, Connie Von Adelung, Edith Von Thungen, Erik Vos, Marijke Vos, Sally Voss, Larry Voyer, Beatrice Vuille, beatrice Vuille, Erik Wagel Sorensen, Ann Wagle, Helga Wagner, Tom Waite, Peter Wakley, Marc Walby, Andrea Walker, David Walker, Doff Walker, Estelle Walker, Jack Walker, Jill Walker, Nancy Walker, Peter Walker, Rene Walker, Roger Walker, Rohn Walker, Margot Wall, Janie Wallace, Jim Wallace, Tony Walpert, Siegfried Walser, Marc Walter, Therese Wanner, George Ward, Lana Ward, Laura Ward, Bruce Warren, Jerry Watson, Susan Watson, Susie Watson-Taylor, Barey Wayne Critzer, Art Webb, Alice Webber, Bennet Webber, Carolyn Weber, Gerd Weber, Harriet Weber, Joan Weber, Maria Weber, Patricia Weber, Regula Weber, Winfred Weber, Paula Webster, Edouard Weesely, Doug Weigand, Judith Weigand, Judy Weigand, Scott Weigand, Nancy Weilgart, Peter Weis, Odile Weisgerber, Rebecca Weiss, Kathy Welch, kathy Welch, Brad Wells, Martha Wells, Ted Wells, Heidi Wendel, Janine Wenger, Marcel Wenger, Chris Wertin, Julien Wessenberger, Dorothy West, Kathy West, Kirk Westerman, Peggy Westerman, Jeanne Weston, Anette Westphal, Kjell Westphal, Joanne Wheaton, Bob Wheeler, Ellyn Wheeler, Janice Wheeler, Larry Wheeler, Lydia Wheeler, William Wherry, Tom Whipple, Betsy White, George White, Judy White, Rosalind White, Kurt Wicki, Monika Wieneke, Sherri Wiktor, Ruth Wilette, Peggy Wiley, Virgil Wilhite, Ernie Wilkens, Janet Wilkens, Cary Wilkins, Janet Wilkins, John Wilkins, Bob Wilkinson, James Wilkinson, John Wilkinson, Fran Willardson, Judith Willardson, Judy Willardson, Ruth Willett, Christine Williams, Dick Williams, Elizabeth Williams, Jack Williams, Karla Williams, Peter Williams, Eve Willner, Neil Willner, Barbara Wilson, Curt Wilson, David Wilson, Duke Wilson, Phil Wilson, Rosa Wilson, Ted Winegar, Dennis WInfrey, Gil Winter, Marge Wirick, Barbara Wiseman, Nikki Wiseman, Adele Witkin, Joan Witt, Judy Witt, Else-Margarete Wojan, Meggie Wojan, Nancy Wold, Barbara Wolf, Shirley Wolf, Mary Wolfe, Benjamin Wolff, Tova Wolff, Leslie Wolleinstein, Gus Wollitzer, Aurora Wong, Bill Wong, Harry Wong, Percy Wong, Roberto Wong, Claire Woodruff, John Woodruff, Diane Woods, Michael Woods, Neil Woods, Steven Woodworth, Diane Workman, Heinz Wrege, Sara Wright Lister, Bonnie Wright, Cyndy Wright, Chris Wrightsman, Pam Wrightsman, Bonnie Wubben, Bia Wunderer, Churlya Wurfel, Hubert Wurfel, Kathy Wydler, Verena Wyss, Alexandra Yacoulef, David Yanrenko, Richard Yared, Brenda Yates, Marie Yates, Bill Yaude, Kathy Yaude, Beat Yogel, Jeff Youmans, Ofelia Yunes, Wolfgang Zabel, Alberet Zack, Anders Zacks, Ed Zacks, Marjorie Zacks, Larry Zagler, Bill Zahn, Bill Zalin, Lorenzo Zambelli, Giovanni Zamboni, Arturo Zamora, Maria Zanaboni, Gianni Zanetti, Lucia Zangrandi, Jack Zani, Laura Zani, Pauline Zani, Peter Zani, Gisela Zapata, Rita Zarahn, Helga Zaun, Robert Zchwartz, Susan Zea, Irina Zecchina, Ivan Zecchina, Bob Zeltzer, Jose Zenas, Heinz Zepernick, Alfredo Zetune, Martha Zetune, Andrea Zhinaghi, Ros Ziebart, Edda Ziehe, Helmut Ziehe, Deborah Zimmatore, Peter Zimmatorre, Michael Zimmer, Oreste Zinaghi, Massimo Zocche, Waki Zollner, Diana Zottola, Glenn Zottola, Antonio Zucchelli, Beatrice Zulauf, Kaija Zulker, Paula Zulli, Harry Zunicky, Elena Zurloni, Giovanna Zurloni, Bryan Zwan, Robert Zwan, Kaspar Zwicky, Robert Zwiegers

Pierre Ethier

Black Ops of the Church of Scientology

 OPERATIONS OFFICER

Successful:

(1) Allowing outer Org B1s to develop their own Ops ideas to submit for
      approval -- and demanding such.

(2) Allowing outer Org B1s to run approved Ops based on first hand data
      as long as it's kept within the framework of the Op.

(3) Providing a believable source of an operation, thereby filling the
      vacuum, so that Scn. isn't dubbed in as source.

(4) When planning an Op, mentally following it all the way through
      looking for areas which need to be taken into account; and taking
the
      enemy's viewpoint of the Op for the same purpose.

(5) Full and correct use of target series for each Op.  Targets simply
      stated and specific as possible.  (Helps in debugging and to hat
      inexperienced persons)

(6) The major target of the Op is based on a *real*, current situation.

(7) When hitting a group or individual, hitting their finance and comm
      lines.

(8) Getting an enemy to attack another enemy.

(9) Working off of programmes which align Ops actions to other Br 1
      sections and other Bureaus and which contain command intention from
      LRH on down.  (Admin scale and priorities aligned)

(10) Working for VFPs and having such reflected in the statistics, rather
      than a lot of sub-products.

(11) Exposure of real, documented enemy crimes and material of a
      scandalous nature.

(12) Utilizing current events and trends (and finding the right buttons)
      for exploitation in Ops channels.

(13) Keeping plans bright and simple and on target.

(14) Finding real buttons.

(15) Keeping up persistent pressure until the product is achieved.

(16) Establishing some type of feedback line so that exact effects are
      known.

(17) Mini-hatting by giving examples of successful Ops.

Unsuccessful:

(1) Ops on random attackers instead of WHOs, just to be doing Ops for Ops
      sake.

(2) Dubbing in buttons.

(3) Trying to do everything on an Op by yourself from a management or
      senior executive level, and therefore not allowing origination or
      juniors to wear their hats.

(4) A one shot approach, rather than persistent pressure and several
      channels to a product.

(5) Harassment actions.

(6) Not planning or providing for a believable source of the Op so that
      a vacuum is left allowing the recipients to dub in Scn amongst
      others.

(7) When planning not considering all the effects as the Op runs it's
      full course, and not taking the enemy's viewpoint, leaving critical
      holes in the plan which will later backfire on you, make your
      scramble on an emergency basis to handle or make the Op less
      effective.

(8) No use of, or misuse of, target series.  (too few, unspecific
      targets; many unaligned, hard to understand targets).

(9) An Op or major target based on revenge or out-of-PT situation.

(10) Producing, and stats aligned with, many sub-products as opposed to
      VFPs.

(11) Manufacturing documented enemy crimes (there are rare exceptions to
      this)

(12) Long involved and overly complex operations with many conditionals
      which if any or any one of several aren't done exactly would cancel
      out the effectiveness of the Op.  (There are rare exceptions)

(13) No feedback line; results of Ops not really known or dubbed in.

                        # # # # #

                 DATA NEEDED BY OPS ON EACH LOCATED WHO

1.  Standard ODC with time track and a brief, summarized, well-rounded
      picture of a terminal.  (Following #2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 are the key areas
      data is needed)

2.  Criminal background of terminal.

3.  Financial involvements (inflow & outflow of money)

4.  Legal involvements (summary of actions)

5.  Terminal's main interests, personal habits, fears, vices and any
      other items of interest.

6.  Friends and enemies on the terminal's 1st Dynamic
      Friends and enemies on the terminal's 2nd Dynamic
      Groups that the terminal belongs to and any groups or terminals, who
      are enemies of that group.

7.  What the terminal considers valuable & is protecting

8.  Simple org board the terminal is on, clearly noting his position and
      his seniors and noteworthy juniors.

9.  What persons have the power to fire terminal from the position he
      holds.

10.  Any rules or regulations that if broken would cause the terminal to
      lose his job/position.

11.  Any regulations concerning licenses that the terminal holds that
      would cause him to lose his license if violated (i.e. law, medical,
      contractor, etc.)

12.  Scandals, conflicts, disputes directly or indirectly connected to
      terminal.

13.  Documents that show criminality of terminal (i.e. cheating on income
      tax, discrediting data in personal letters, use of drugs, etc.)

14.

15.

Ops Planning

Ops planning goes over all the data on the WHO that Ops research has
compiled and with all the data available on the WHO, plans out channels of
attack on the WHO that will effectively remove/restrain the WHO from his
position of power.  Ops planning on a WHO is done using the data series,
target series, all Scientology tech applicable, and intelligence tech.
The following points should be followed in doing an operation:

1.  Initially plan out at least 3 channels of attack with the data you
      have at hand.  Do not wait forever to getall data collected, but
      also do not run Ops that would be dangerous without essential data.
      Basically a brighter idea is needed with less data available.  3
      channels being done instead of less is because there is a higher
      percentage of getting results and also this will tend to confuse and
      spin the WHO as there are 3 attacks instead of just one.

2.  Continue to plan Ops utilizing feedback from completed Ops so that
      the WHO has persistent attack on him and continual pressure.  Do
this
      consistent attack until the WHO is obliterated.

3.  Stay away from harassment actions that are only for the sake of doing
      channels or revenge.  ie: Sending pizzas from every Pizza delivery
      restaurant.  These basically have been unsuccessful as they do not
      achieve any real effective result, except for letting the WHO know
      that he is under attack.  There may be times when 50 pizzas every
day
      being sent to a WHO would be effective, but this would be in such a
      case where the WHO was restimulated heavily by seeing pizzas,
      smelling pepperoni or seeing pizza delivery boys, etc.

4.  Always include a way of getting feedback in an operation, so you know
      what type of result you are getting and for further planning of
      channels in those areas that give good results.

5.  Ensure proper security is planned in an operation, ie: use of an
      untraceable typewriter, paper without fingerprints, proper covers by
      FSM's, etc. (See security write-up and security section data in hat
      materials of Ops US hat checksheet)

6.  Use the target series exactly to programme out an operation on a WHO.
      Ensure the major target is based on a *real*, current situation and
      is an achievable purpose.

7.  Find out what the exact resources are for the area the Op will be
      implemented in and what the capabilities are of your terminals
      implementing the Op.

8.  Keep the targets in an operation simple, yet complete.

9.  Analyze properly the actual situation with the WHO and what the best
      line of attack should be done by the GO as a whole.  It may be
      necessary to suggest that PR or Legal do some specific action as a
      finishing off of the WHO.  Never wait for another bureau to handle a
      WHO, as Ops is responsible and has the capabilities to handle WHO's
      totally without the other Bureaus in the GO.  Liaison though is very
      important with the various GO bureaus, specifically the Legal Branch
      2 (attack area of Legal) and PR Branch 1 (attack area of PR).

10.  A believable source must be provided in an operation, thereby
      "filling the vacuum," so that Scientology isn't dubbed in as source
      of the attack.  A1 Ops are planned in such a way that they in no way
      could be traced back to the Church.

11.  Channels should be various and ever changing types of channel of
      attack, rather than sticking to one type of Op, such as an anonymous
      flyer that 3-P's a WHO.

12.  Mentally follow-thru your plan and ensure all factors concerning
      security and workability are taken into account.  It is a good idea
      to also take the enemy's viewpoint when working out your strategy in
      the operation.

Once the plan is fully targeted out, CSW with full complete data your
operation to the Dir Br1 US.  When it is approved, then the Ops plan and
the applicable data is flowed to Ops execution part of the Ops section.

Ops Execution

Ops execution implements the targeted-out approved operation.  If an AGI
in the field is to receive the targeted plan or orders to do a part of the
operation then this is routed in the following manner:

            Branch 1 Director US
            DG I US
            Ops mail line
            AGI _______
            _________________
            OPS OFF US

      The "Ops mail line" is a point where the Ops targets are mailed
      directly on a confidential line directly to the Ops terminal in the
      field.  (See the attached Ops Write-up 1R and the attached write-up
      of the US Ops Com-Lines)

Flexibility is important when doing a targeted out plan.  An operation
should not be done robotically, as at times an Operation can be found to
be unworkable for any number of different reasons.  As execution observes
the PT scenes of the Op and obtains feedback, it may be more applicable to
re-CSW new actions or alter targets because of threat of exposure of the
Op, etc.

Execution gets the Operation implemented and acts as Ops programmes
officer, 8-Cing Ops units to get the necessary targets done and debugging
bogged targets.  Execution works very close to planning in that the
necessary PT scene of the Op with feedback of the results is immediately
infoed to Ops planning, so new channels can be drawn up or revised as
necessary.

Ops execution ensures that the stat and report lines are in from his Ops
units implementing the operation.  (Ops Write-up 2R and 3 attached)

Source: http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn/ops.htm

Thanks to  Arnaldo Lerma and Ida Camburn (http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn )

The origin of NOTs materials obtained through the legal system

Source: http://www.modemac.com/nots/nots7.html

On September 5th, 1996 a person in Sweden by the name of Zenon Panoussis filed NOTs with the Swedish Parliament Office. “Scientology responded by demanding that the court case be placed under “secrecy” — effectively sealing the case and thus ensuring that NOTs would not made accessible to the public in the way that the OT levels were entered as part of the Fishman Affidavit. But the secrecy order was initially denied. Zenon posted instructions on how to order copies of legal documents from the court on September 9, including copies of NOTs. The issue of secrecy was evidently vital to Scientology: in this message, Zenon notes that Scientology filed a second request for secrecy, and they appealed their first request. But these motions of secrecy were again dismissed by the Stockholm court of appeals. On Friday the 13th (ironically?), as Zenon writes, “the OTs and NOTs are still public documents and will most probably remain so forever.” As the OT court cases demonstrated in America, it is currently legal to order a copy of NOTs from the Stockholm court. (However, the legality of making copyrighted materials available for download on the Internet is questionable.)

Why were Scientology’s requests for secrecy repeatedly denied? The reason has to do with a unique policy in Sweden called offentlighetsprincipen. This is a provision of the Swedish constitution that guarantees access to public documents in order to prevent corruption and fraud, and it is considered a basic civil right in Sweden. The policy is explained in more detail in this email from an anonymous Swedish official.”

Currently number of people in the free field who have ordered copies of NOTs through the justice system may own a perfectly legal copy of NOTs materials. Please note that this article does not constitute a legal advice in regard to the status of those documents as the law vary in different jurisdictions. In addition it appears the authentic NOTs materials filed in the legal system have been stolen on a number of occasions and allegedly replaced with “Black Scientology” materials in order to sink in the free field. The replacement of the originally filed materials is on record.

NOTE: Some of the upper level materials that were independently leaked have been seeded with subverted issues designed to bring about instability or potential insanity within the unfortunate recipient.  Therefore it would be wise to authenticate the source materials used.

Related link: History of NOTs on the Net

Scientology, Myths and Copyright

https://i0.wp.com/www.xenu.net/archive/so/jesse1.jpgIn mid 1983 the Corporate Church of Scientology started a massive program to register LRH material. This is the reason most copyright filings have a date of 1983 forward. By then most of the HCOBs written by LRH prior to 1978 had fallen into Public Domain. To get around this the HCOBs were issued into tech volumes and then a copyright  was gotten to cover the whole book. But, if you look at the individual HCOBs in the tech volumes, the copyright is missing on each individual one. This is because most of the original works are individually not copyrighted anymore and fell in the Public Domain! It became a common practice  to take an issue that has fallen into the public domain, change a few lines of it, then get a copyright on their revised edition. This is why the original works were revised and changed.

The failure of LRH to place notice of copyright on the original works and documents he published before 1978 seem to have resulted in those works falling into Public Domain. The copyright law changed in 1978 , when the copyright notice was no longer required to reserve the authors rights.

In the RTC vs FACTnet case, Judge Kane wrote a Memorandum Opinion and an Order, where he noted that once a work enters the public domain, it remains there irrevocably. The 1909 Copyright Act required, inter alia, that the copyright owner of a published document affix proper notice to each publicly distributed copy of the work. Non compliance with the notice requirement could inject the work into the public domain. Indeed the Copyright Act of 1909 contained a very strict notice requirement. A work published without a valid copyright notice was automatically injected into the public domain. 17 U.S.C. SS10, 19 et. Seq. (1909 Act) ; New Era Publications International, APS v. Carol Pub. Group, 904 F.2d 152, 161 (2d Cir.), cert. Denied, 111 S. Ct. 297 (1990).

In the RTC vs FACTNet case, the church alleged that FACTNet violated 1900 of their copyrights. All 1900 issues in the FACTNet case were copyrighted between 83 and 87 and they were not copyrighted earlier. In some instances they do have earlier registrations but the majority of them do not. Below is affidavit by Jesse Price in regard to the copyright issues of the original works.

In addition to some of the original works falling into the Public Domain, the Corporate Church of Scientology no longer maintains the trademark for L10, L11, L12 as of 2005 due to failure to renew their trademark registration.( for example: “On Tuesday, January 24, 1984, a U.S. federal trademark registration was filed for L 10 by Religious Technology Center, Los Angeles 90028. The USPTO has given the L 10 trademark serial number of 73462364. The current federal status of this trademark filing is CANCELLED – SECTION 8. The correspondent listed for L 10 is JOAN K. LARKIN of BAKER & MCKENZIE, 725 S. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 . The L 10 trademark is filed in the category of Computer & Software Services & Scientific Services . The description provided to the USPTO for L 10 is Religious and Ministerial Services, Including Pastoral Counselling. “)

Link to check US trademark :http://tess2.uspto.gov/

L10 – dead trademark as of 2005

L11 -dead trademark as of 2005 

L12- dead trademark as of 2005

List of dead trademarks related to Scientology: http://www.fzglobal.org/trademarks.htm

—-

Jesse Prince Affidavit

I, Jesse Prince declare as follows:

1. I am over 18 years of age and currently reside in the state of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. This declaration is of my own personal knowledge and if called upon to testify to the facts herein I could and would be competently able to testify thereto.

2. I am intimately familiar with the Scientology organization, movement and beliefs because I was in Scientology for 16 years (1976-92) and served in the highest ranks, including as the second in command of the Religious Technology Center (RTC). At that time, my position was “Deputy Inspector General, External” which meant being in charge of all activities outside the body of Scientology. This included being in charge of all litigation by or against any Scientology organization, intelligence (spying, covert operations) brought against perceived or imagined “enemies” (which ranged from critics to media to the courts), trademark registrations, and the licensing of trademarks to other Scientology organizations, which was how we tightly controlled all Scientology corporations while creating the false impression of “corporate integrity.”

3. It is incumbent on this and every court, as well as the authorities, to realize the amount of deception, chicanery, lying, manipulation and outright criminality that Scientology will employ to hide the truth about their criminal activities. They will spend any amount of money to do this. I know because I was part of it for years. I received orders to break the law. I issued orders to break the law. I got others to break the law, and then I helped to hide these criminal activities just as they are hiding them now.

4. In fact, this tactic is one of the most coercive used by the Scientology hierarchy: to involve members in criminal acts for which they are then liable, which then prevents the person from speaking out. Even if the member manages to leave or flee, they will be reluctant to speak to the courts or the authorities because they were part of criminal activities. Plus the organization is ready to use Mafia-like tactics to threaten an ex-member if the hierarchy is afraid of their testimony. If the ex-member does speak, the organization will claim no knowledge and blames the individual, calling them a criminal when that person was doing nothing more than following orders under duress.

5. Members of Scientology are induced to confess to acts that, if not outright criminal, are embarrassing or possibly destructive to the person’s job, marriage or profession, for example, shoplifting, adultery, masturbation, or drug abuse. The member is urged to write these down in their own handwriting, under the guise that it is a “religious confessional” for the member’s good. The truth is that these “confessions” are kept to blackmail and extort the member should they dare to speak out. The member is also coerced to sign documents that are self-damaging while protecting the organization, solely in case the member dares to leave their control and speak the truth. I know because I watched this done to others, I did it to others and it was done to me. That is why I respectfully urge this court to recognize Scientology’s tactics and treat them for what they are: criminal deceit to defraud this court at any cost.

6. For the past five years since I fled Scientology, I have been silent because it was my intent to create a new life for myself, away from their obsessive control, and it required all the energy that I could muster to do that. About two weeks ago, I finally became curious as to what was happening within the Scientology world and I used the Internet to look up Scientology and was stunned to discover former friends who had also left and the conflicts being waged in the courts. I contacted one (Stacy Young) who had been a close friend for many years in the cult who told me what had been happening, with former members fighting to have the abuses and the criminality exposed.

7. Because I have intimate and personal knowledge of issues in this case, she put me in touch with attorney Dan Leipold and I traveled to his offices in Santa Ana, California. After speaking with him and others, I realized that this level of criminal fraud and deceit can no longer continue without opposition. I could no longer remain silent, regardless of their terrorism. I offered to tell the court how Scientology really operates with trademarks, copyrights and the courts. In fact, I am doing this at the risk of enduring the hate campaign this pseudo-religion will wage against me, as they have against others, including judges.

8. Let me begin with some basic information about my own Scientology history:     I first became involved with Scientology in September 1976, in San Francisco. In late 1976 I joined the elite Scientology paramilitary organization known as the Sea Organization, also known as the “Sea Org” or the acronym “SO.” The Sea Organization is the actual nexus that controls the Scientology empire. Sea Organization personnel are authorized to take over and control Scientology organizations and to demote personnel, move bank accounts and run the corporation as if the SO personnel were employees or representatives of that corporation but they are not. This is true if the organization was part of the “Church of Scientology” or one of the secular areas such as Bridge Publications. This is possible because the only personnel allowed into executive positions in these organization are those who are in full agreement that the Sea Organization is the commanding organization. This weeding out process guarantees there will be no executives who will resist or protect their corporate integrity. This is how the Sea Organization can operate with impunity, and continue to claim that it is merely a “fraternal organization.” The Sea Organization is a “fraternal organization” the way the Cosa Nostra is.

9. Before I was recruited into the Religious Technology Center (RTC) in 1982, most of my experience was with Scientology technical material; the actual codified techniques used within the organization. This gave me considerable time to become familiar with the material, most of which was written by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard. It was that familiarity that prompted my promotion to a technical position at RTC.

10. Physically, I was transferred to and lived and worked at what is known as “Golden Era Studios,” near Hemet, California. It is also known as “Gold” or simply “the base.” RTC’s presence at Gold was fully known to all at the base, but was kept hidden from all others, to try to make it appear that Gold was merely a movie/tape production studio when really the movie/tape production is nothing but a front to mask, hide and protect the top of Scientology’s actual power structure so they cannot be served with subpoenas. (The security system is more befitting a top secret military installation, with its motion detectors, buried sensors, high-speed cameras, night cameras, guards on motorcycles, and barbed wire fences wired to detect anyone touching it etc.)

RTC was at that time the most senior, most powerful and most influential organization in all of Scientology. All at RTC were Sea Org members, as are all at the base. But because of RTC’s position, we were the elite at the base.

11. In March 1983, I became the Deputy Inspector General, External, and a member of the Board of Directors for RTC, as Treasurer. (The only other board members were Warren McShane as Secretary and Vicki Aznaran as President, during this time.) At the time I was appointed a member of the Board of Directors of RTC I was forced to sign an undated letter of resignation. This is standard practice with all Scientology board members and is another means by which the Scientology corporations are controlled while giving the appearance of corporate integrity.

12. In that capacity for the next few years, I traveled about the US and outside of the US on behalf of RTC. I traveled to Germany, Italy, Australia, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Mexico and Canada, with several trips to some of these countries. These trips were to put together an infrastructure that would then interface with RTC for the purpose of trademarks. I became familiar with the law with regard to each area, interviewed and approved law firms, and put the personnel in place that would report to RTC and be our on-the-ground representatives in dealing with the attorneys etc.

13. When Hubbard died in 1986, there was a power struggle in Scientology for the next 18 or so months that resulted in Hubbard’s closest and most powerful aide (Pat Broeker) being removed. The power was taken over by David Miscavige who purged the organization of anyone who was friendly with Broeker. In mid-1987, I was removed from my position and put under armed guard at Happy Valley, a property the organization owns that is a few miles west of Gold and located deep in the Soboba Indian Reservation. I assume the undated resignation I provided on being appointed to the Board was then dated and used to make it appear that I had resigned, when I had not. After a few months, it was decided that I would not escape and I was given various jobs at Gold but kept under watch. My pay was standard Sea Org pay, $24 per week.

14. I should clarify why I (and others) tolerated such treatment for so long. The ability to tolerate such abusive conditions and treatment are one of the most basic requirements for promotion in the Sea Organization and RTC. We were selected and promoted because we vowed such loyalty and demonstrated it daily. Not unlike a military unit, it is the ability of the Sea Org member to take orders, carry out the assignment and to tolerate self-degrading conditions that ingratiates them to their seniors and to the system. That was why I was promoted so highly and why I then tolerated more. Looking back on it, I cannot believe that I actually tolerated such denigration and such abuse and actually deluded myself that it was for my good as well as the good of others.

15. In late 1991, my wife Monika became pregnant and although we were elated, she was ordered to abort the child. The reason for the abortion order is that Sea Org members were not allowed to have children. The order devastated both my wife and me. Our dedication as Sea Org members clashed violently with our intentions as parents and we went through a personal nightmare with me opposing it, to no avail. She got the abortion and afterwards she was not the same. She was devastated at the impact of what she did and that was when she told me she wanted to leave. We fled, with the organization close behind us, trying to find us. They finally did and convinced us to return so we could “leave properly.”

16. Once they had us again behind the barbwire and watched by security, my wife was threatened that if we did not sign certain papers, she would no longer be able to see her father and her sister, who were both in the Sea Organization.

17. This is another coercive power that the organization wields. Like a police state, it can order and enforce family members to alter their relations, and even get them to turn against each other. Monika and I knew that if the organization said she would be kept from her father and sister (by control over them), that she would not again be able to talk to them or see them, let alone visit. This is called “disconnection” in Scientology. We agreed to sign the papers and were able to leave.

18. On July 26, 1998, one of the cult’s attorneys sent a long fax to Dan Leipold that is their first not-so-veiled threat to me, warning me to be silent. The attorney included the document they prepared for me and that I signed under the conditions I just described. I am attaching his letter and the documents I was forced to sign under duress as my first evidence of what this criminal cult does to silence anyone speaking out. (Exhibit 1). It does not surprise me, as it is a standard tactic, to force a person to create or sign a self-damaging document to use when ready.

19. I have also been privy to the destruction and alteration of documents to protect the group. On or about April of 1983 I was present at a meeting, which took place in Los Angeles, California at a Scientology office called Author Services, Inc. (ASI). ASI presented itself as the “literary agency” for Hubbard but it was actually the top of the Scientology empire at that time. All of Scientology was being directed from ASI in 1982. ASI was where various Scientology corporations went to receive orders.

20. Present at the meeting was David Miscavige, then the chairman of the board of ASI, Vicki Aznaran then the Deputy Inspector General of Religious Technology Center, (RTC) and Lymon Spurlock, who was “Director of Client Affairs” for ASI. Mr. Miscavige expressed concern at this meeting that there might possibly be a raid on Scientology by the IRS. At that time, none of the churches of Scientology had received tax exempt status.

21. One principle reason why tax exempt status had not been granted was the IRS’s position that Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard (LRH) was actually the managing agent of Scientology in complete disregard of the corporate structure of Scientology. We knew this to be a fact but also knew that it violated IRS rules and thus had to be hidden.

22. There was concern that the IRS would obtain the hundreds of daily, weekly and monthly LRH orders written by Mr. Hubbard and distributed throughout Scientology. These orders were commonly referred to in Scientology as “advices” to avoid the appearance that LRH was actually running Scientology. In fact, LRH was running Scientology. The principle concern expressed at this meeting was that the LRH orders or “advices” would be used to name L. Ron Hubbard as the managing agent of Scientology.

23. Because of an already existing fear that an LRH “advice” might fall into the wrong hands, these orders from him were written in a way that we could deny it was from him. His name was not on them. He was never cited in the dispatch except in the third person. There was no signature and a salutation in reply was never more than “Dear Sir.” The routing at the top referred to him merely as “*,” an asterisk. However if a person (or an agency) got enough of these, there would be little doubt that we were in touch with Hubbard (via ASI) and he was telling us and each corporation what to do to make him more money.

24. David Miscavige specifically stated that ASI was “already dealing with the problem”, ridding ASI of any documents that would implicate L. Ron Hubbard as managing agent of Scientology. He stated that under his directive the LRH orders, or “advices”, were being collected and transferred by truck to a Riverside County recycling plant where the documents were to be “pulped”. This method of destruction was considered to be better than shredding. I was also given instructions that I was in charge of purging the remainder of the Scientology organization of LRH orders. This was to include Church of Scientology of California (CSC); Church of Scientology International (CSI); and RTC.

25. Several weeks after this first meeting I attended a second meeting at the ASI offices concerning the continuing destruction of Scientology corporate documentation. In attendance at the second meeting were David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicki Aznaran, Norman Starkey and Marty Rathburn. At this meeting, David Miscavige for the first time stated that Scientology had been ordered by a court to produce various documents concerning a former Scientology member named Lawrence Wollersheim who had a lawsuit pending in Los Angeles against the Church of Scientology of California. The court had ordered Scientology to produce Mr. Wollersheim’s entire “preclear” (PC) file.

26. A “PC ” file is one of several files kept on members. The PC file is the file that includes all written records of all “confessionals” done by the member. This means that it includes not only the most self-damaging material but it also reflects every problem the person might have had with the organization, including complaints. This PC file grows with the person’s tenure in Scientology.

27. Mr. Wollersheim’s PC file was several thousand pages in length and stood as high as a six-foot tall man. Initially at this meeting it was decided that Mr. Wollersheim’s PC file would be redacted and culled of any evidence or documentation which might assist Mr. Wollersheim in his lawsuit against CSC. There was also concern that the materials known as Clear, OT I, OT II, OT III and NED for OT’s (NOTS) would be open to public inspection if Mr. Wollersheim’s files were produced as ordered. Scientologists are taught that a person could catch pneumonia and die if that person is prematurely exposed to these “upper level” materials without first having taken many hours of preparatory auditing. Ultimately, approximately 50 pages were produced pursuant to the court order. Mr. Wollersheim’s PC file was culled based on a direct order from David Miscavige.

28. Later, I was informed that a second court order was issued to produce Mr. Wollersheim’s entire file. Faced with the prospect of having to produce the entire file David Miscavige gave orders that the entire file simply be destroyed by being pulped.

29. Pursuant to Mr. Miscavige’s orders I ordered Rick Aznaran to take Mr. Wollersheim’s PC files to the recycling plant in Riverside to be pulped. Several hours after I gave the order to have Mr. Wollersheim’s PC files destroyed, Mr. Aznaran returned and confirmed that the records had been pulped and even showed me a small bottle of pulped material, saying “Here’s what’s left.”

30. The material that David Miscavige ordered destroyed and which Rick Aznaran had pulped was the same material that the court had ordered produced in Mr. Wollersheim’s Los Angeles court case against CSC.

31. In early 1983 I attended a meeting at Scientology’s ASI office in Los Angeles. In attendance at this meeting were David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicki Aznaran, Patricia Brice and Edith Buchele. The meeting concerned Scientology copyrights. In particular, David Miscavige stated that Scientology was “in trouble” concerning the copyright status of the many published materials of founder L Ron Hubbard. Concern was expressed that many of Mr. Hubbard’s published materials had become ‘public domain” because the materials had not been registered with the United States Copyright office for many years. David Miscavige stated that Scientology had failed to register copyrights for thousands of pages of Scientology material written by Mr. Hubbard. These records included the numerous policy letters and bulletins published by Mr. Hubbard. In particular, Mr. Hubbard published “Policy Letters” (always published in green ink on white paper and intended as administrative directives) LRH ED’s (Executive Directives) which are used for various topics, (always issued as blue ink on white paper) and “Technical Bulletins” published with red ink on white paper covering technical aspect of Scientology such as Auditing techniques, Policy and Ethics.

32. At the same meeting in early 1983 David Miscavige specifically ordered Patricia Brice (who at the time was L. Ron Hubbard’s personal secretary and an employee of ASI) to begin the process of mass copyright registration filings for all of L. Ron Hubbard’s materials. This order was given despite the fact that Mr. Miscavige was already aware that many of the materials in question were already in the public domain. Thus, I know from personal knowledge that in mid 1983 Scientology began a massive program to register Mr. Hubbard’s material with the United State’s Copyright office.

33. Based on my many years of reading and studying Scientology directives including my time as a “Co-Audit Supervisor” and “Inspector General Cramming Officer” I became intimately familiar with the content, form, manner of distribution and publication of Scientology works and directives including the works of L. Ron Hubbard. As a Cramming Officer it was my job to insure that those who employ Scientology “tech” properly adhere to the official guidelines adopted by Scientology.

34. I was requested by counsel for Mr. Wollersheim to review the exhibits to BPI’s renewed motion for summary judgement. These were contained in more than 20 banker’s boxes.

In reviewing these boxes of exhibits I selected out documents at random to inspect. The chart below explains the result of my examination of certain of the exhibits. In examining the plaintiff’s exhibits I compared the alleged LRH originals submitted by the plaintiff’s as exhibits to some early editions of Scientology compilations which contains the policy issues in question. I employed a “1st edition” of the Organization Executive Course, and a “First printing of the Scientology Technical Bulletins for comparison to what BPI has claimed are the LRH originals.

35. I have attached hereto copies of various LRH materials that were published by Scientology in the early 1970’s that prove conclusively that the copy right notices on BPI’s purported “LRH originals” were not present then, but placed on the “originals” at a later date.

          Exhibit         Date Issued Copyright Registration           Title
B-1287           1954   27 January 1975 The Church of Scientology Creed FACTNet copy bears no resemblance to original
B-1289           1953,ca.endMay 2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983) LRH PAB No. 2 A Summary of SOP 8A Copyright notice 1953 Copyright res. for compilation published Dec. 1955
B-1292  1953 ca.end July 2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983) LRH PAB No. 6 No title Copyright notice 1953 Copyright res. for compilation published Dec. 1955
B-1293 1953 ca. mid. August 2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983) LRH PAB No. 7 Six Steps to Better Beingness Copyright notice 1953 Copyright res. for compilation published Dec. 1955
B-1290 1953 ca. mid June 2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983) LRH PAB No. 3 Certainty Processing Copyright notice 1953 Copyright res. for compilation published Dec. 1955
          Exhibit Date Issued Copyright Registration           Title
   B-4 2 June 1959 22 December 1987 (renewal 22 December 1987) HCO PL Purchasing Liability of Staff Members Copyright notice 1959 but original contains reference to CSI which did not exist until 1981
  B-2    2 May 1957 24 December 1985 (renewal 24 December 1985)  HCO PL Dissemination Original offered by BPI is substantially different from that published as an original in OEC Vol. II 1st Ed. 1970 ; Copyright notice 1957, registration 1985
B-1291 Ca. mid-July 1953 2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983) LRH PAB No. 5 About PABs B-1291 BIP original contains no copyright notice. However FACTNet copy and copy of document published in 1st printing of Technical Bulletins Vol. I contain 1953 copyright notice. Copyright registration is 1955 as part of compilation
B-1288  20 July 1956 22 September 1983 (renewal 26 December 1984) Article From LRH to HGC Staff “How to really split a valance.”    No Copyright notice in claimed original
  B-371 16 December 1958 12 May 1983 (renewal 22 January 1986) HCOB Extension Course Curriculum           BPI original contains notice 1958, however copy of document published by Scientology in 1976 in Technical Bulletins Vol. III 1st printing contains no copyright notice
          Exhibit   Date Issued Copyright Registration           Title
B-59  21 March 1965 28 January 1988 (renewal 9 September 1993) HCO PL Staff Members Auditing Outside PCs BPI original contains copyright notice 1958, however, copy of document published in 1970 OEC Vol. I 1st Ed. contains no copyright notice.
B-249 28 April 1973  28 April 1988 HCO PL Good Service BPI original shows on face it was 1st published Dec. 23, 1968, not claimed date of April 28, 1973
B-157 2 September 1968 28 January 1988 HCOPL Chaplain BPI original shows on face 1st appeared as Sea Organization Flag Order
B-94 24 August 1965 28 January 1988 (renewal 3 November 1993) HCO PL Cleanliness of Quarters and Staff Improve Our Image BPI “original” contains 1965 copyright notice. However, “original” references CSI which did not exist until 1981
B-248 27 December 1972 28 January 1988 HCO PL Speed of Service BPI original shows on face published 1968, not claimed date of 1972
          Exhibit Date Issued Copyright Registration           Title
B-214 4 January 1971 2 May 1991 HCO PL Competence BPI original contains no copyright notice
C-3  5 February 1958 27 January 1995 HCO PL No New Charters BPI original contains no copyright notice
B-215 25 January 1971 28 January 1988 HCO PL Squirrel Admin Claimed original contains 1971 copyright notice. However, also contains reference to CSI which did not exist until 1981
B-1 25 January 1957 24 December 1985 (24 December 1985) HCO PL Concerning the Separateness of Dianetics and Scientology BPI original shows on face not original but Issue II
B-369 25 November 1958 12 May 1983 (renewal 22 January 1986)           HCOB Step 6  BPI “original” contains a 1958 copyright notice. However, 1st printing of Technical Bulletins in 1976 Vol. III contains no copyright notice for this document
          Exhibit Date Issued Copyright Registration           Title

36. The above chart documents my observations in reviewing the documents that I selected at random to review. The important points that I believe the Court should note with reference to these documents are as follows:

1. Exhibits B-1289; 1290; 1291; 1292 and 1293 contain a 1953 copyright notice. However, the copyright registrations submitted by BPI are for a compilation published in 1955.

2. Exhibits B4; B-94 and B-215 all contain copyright notices from the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s that contain notations to CSI. CSI is the Church of Scientology International, which did not come into existence until 1981. Therefore, either BPI’s “originals” are not originals as claimed, or the copyright notices were placed on these documents long after they were published. (Exhibits 2, 3 and 4 attached hereto).

3. Exhibits B-59; B-369; and B-371 contain copyright notices from 1958. However, when these originals are compared to first printings or first editions of compilations put out by Scientology in the 1970’s, these copyright notices are not present, indicating that they were placed in the “originals” subsequent to the compilations being published. (Exhibits 5-7).

4. Exhibit B-2 is substantially different from that published as an original in OEC Vol. II, 1st Ed. 1970. (Exhibit 8 attached hereto).

5. Exhibit B-1287. The FACTNet copy bears virtually no resemblance to the BPI original.

6. Exhibits B-1288; B-214; and C-3. The BPI originals contain no copyright notice.

7. Exhibit B-1 shows on its face it is not an original but “Issue II.”

8. Exhibits B-248; B-249; and B-157 show on their face they were published elsewhere prior to the claimed original publication.

37. Based on my knowledge gained as a staff member of Scientology, including my assignment as “Chief Cramming Officer” and based on my examination of the exhibits submitted by BPI in support of their renewed motion for summary judgment, it appears that numerous “originals” submitted by BPI are not originals at all and that copyright notices were placed on documents long after publication back-dating them to the date of publication.

Further declarant sayeth naught.

I declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 27th day of July, 1998, at Santa Ana, California.

JESSE PRINCE

—-

AFFIDAVIT DE Jesse Prince

    Je soussigné, Jesse Prince , déclare ce qui suit

         1. J’ai plus de dix-huit ans et j’habite actuellement dans le Minnesota, Comté de Hennepin. Cette déclaration est faite en vertu de mon savoir personnel et si l’on me demande de témoigner sur les faits ci-après, je le pourrai et serai en mesure de le faire avec compétence.

         Je suis tout à fait familiarisé avec l’organisation, le mouvement et les croyances scientologiques du fait que j’y suis resté durant seize ans (1976-1992) et que j’y ai servi aux  postes les plus importants, y compris second du RTC – Centre de Technologie Religieuse [direction globale de la secte, ndt]. J’étais alors “Député Inspecteur Général Externe”, ce qui veut dire que j’avais la responsabilité de toutes les activités hors du corps scientologue proprement dit. Cela comprend tout litige de la part ou contre toute organisation scientologique, le renseignement (espionnage, opérations cachées) contre tout “ennemi” perçu ou imaginaire (ce qui va des critiques aux médias et aux tribunaux), les enregistrements des droits d’auteur, le fait de licencier ces droits et marques à d’autres organisations scientologiques – ce qui constituait la manière de contrôler au plus près toutes les entités légales scientologiques tout en créant une fausse impression d’intégrité des divers corps.

         3. Il incombe à tout tribunal ainsi qu’aux autorités de bien réaliser la masse de tromperie, chicanerie, mensonge, manipulation et criminalité pure et simple qu’emploiera la scientologie pour cacher les faits mêmes de ses crimes. Ils y dépenseront autant d’argent qu’il le faudra: je le sais pour en avoir fait partie des années durant. J’ai reçu des ordres de violer la loi. J’ai donné des ordres qu’on viole la loi. J’ai fait violer les lois à d’autres, puis je les ai aidés à camoufler ces activités criminelles exactement de la façon dont ils le font.

         4. Cette tactique est en réalité l’une des plus coercitives utilisées par la hiérarchie scientologique: impliquer ses membres dans des actes criminels pour lesquels ils peuvent être poursuivis, ce qui les empèche dès lors de parler. Même lorsque l’adepte réussit à fuir, il craindra de parler en justice ou aux officiels, ayant lui-même participé à ces crimes. En outre, l’organisation use de tactiques maffieuses pour menacer tout ancien membre, au cas où la hiérarchie craint son témoignage. Si l’ex-membre parle, l’organisation prétendra ne rien savoir et accusera l’individu, le qualifiant de criminel alors que cette personne n’a rien fait d’autre que suivre les ordres en raison de la pression exercée.

         5. Les membres de la scientologie sont poussés à confesser des actes qui, même s’ils ne sont pas carrément criminels, sont génants et pourraient détruire son emploi, son mariage ou sa profession. Exemples: vol dans les magasins, adultère, masturbation, usage de drogue. On exige que l’adepte écrive ces faits de sa main, sous prétexte de “confession religieuse”, soi-disant pour le “bien” de cette personne. Ces “confessions” sont conservées aux fins de chantage et extorsion, au cas où le membre parlerait. On le force aussi à signer des documents l’impliquant personnellement tout en protégeant l’organisation, au cas où l’adepte s’en irait et oserait parler. Je le sais pour l’avoir vu faire à d’autres, pour l’avoir moi-même demandé à d’autres, et pour l’avoir fait moi-même. C’est pourquoi je demande respectueusement à ce tribunal de reconnaître les tactiques scientologues et de les traîter pour ce qu’elles sont: tromperie criminelle afin de leurrer le tribunal à n’importe quel prix.

         6. J’ai fui la scientologie depuis cinq ans, je me suis tu, car je voulais me recréer une existence différente, loin de leur contrôle obsessionnel, et il m’a fallu rassembler beaucoup de force pour y parvenir. Il y a une quinzaine, j’ai voulu savoir ce qu’il advenait du monde scientologue et me suis servi d’Internet pour enquèter. J’ai été très surpris d’y découvrir d’anciens amis ayant également quitté la secte, et les conflits en cours devant les tribunaux. J’ai contacté l’une de ces amies (Stacy Young) qui fut très proche dans la secte des années durant; elle m’a raconté ce qui se passait, en particulier tous les anciens membres dévoués à faire connaître les abus et la criminalité.

         7. Ayant été au coeur des affaires, elle m’a mis en contact avec l’avocat Dan Liepold de Santa Ana, Californie; je lui ai rendu visite. Après avoir parlé à Me Leipold et à d’autres, je me suis rendu compte que ce niveau de tromperie criminelle ne pouvait se perpétuer sans rencontrer d’opposition. Je ne pouvais plus me taire, quel que soit le terrorisme exercé. J’ai offert au Tribunal de démontrer comment la scientologie fonctionne vis à vis des marques , des droits d’auteur et des tribunaux. J’encours donc le risque d’une campagne de haine de la part que cette pseudo-religion lancera contre moi, comme elle le fit à l’encontre d’autres gens, y compris des juges.

         8.  Commençons par quelques informations sur mon passé de scientologue. J’ai rencontré la scientologie en septembre 1976 à San Francisco. Fin 76, je me suis engagé dans le coprs para-militaire d’élite connus sous le nom de ‘Sea Org’ (organisation maritime). La Sea Org est le coeur même de l’empire scientologue. Le personnel Sea Org a plein pouvoir pour prendre le coçntrôle de toute organisation scientologique et d’en démettre du personnel, d’en modifier les comptes bancaires, et de  faire fonctionner cette organisation comme si les employés Sea Org s’y trouvaient employés ou en étaient fondés de pouvoir, alors qu’ils ne le sont pas.

    Cela se produit lorsque l’organisation fait partie de “L’Eglise de Scientologie”, ou qu’il s’agit d’une zone séculière (laïque) telle que Bridge Publications. Ceci n’est possible qu’en raison du fait que le seul personnel admis à encadrer ces organisations se compose de ceux qui sont pleinement d’accord sur le fait que la Sea Org est l’organisation de commandement suprème. Ce procédé d’élimination garantit qu’il n’y aura pas de cadres résistant ou protégeant l’intégrité de leur affaire. C’est ainsi que la Sea Org peut impunément opérer et continuer à se déclarer “organisation confraternelle” – à la manière de la Cosa Nostra.

         9. Avant mon recrutement au RTC (Centre de Technologie religieuse) en 1982, j’ai surtout exercé au moyen des techniques scientologiques, techniques codifiées qui sont utilisées dans l’organisation. Ceci m’a considérablement familiarisé avec le matériau, dont l’essentiel est l’oeuvre du fondateur de la scientologie, L. Ron Hubbard. C’est cette expertise qui m’a fait choisir pour tenir un poste au sein du RTC.

         10. On m’a transféré alors aux “Golden Era Studios”, près de Hemet, Californie, où j’ai alors habité et travaillé. C’est aussi appelé “Gold” ou “La Base”. La présence de RTC est tout à fait connue à Gold, mais tout y est caché aux gens qui n’en font pas partie, afin que Gold semble n’être qu’un studio de production, alors qu’il ne s’agit que d’une façade destinée à protéger et cacher la structure véritable de pouvoir de la scientologie, pour qu’on ne puisse lui délivrer d’assignations à comparaître. (Le système de sécurité convient tout à fait à une organisation militaire ultra-secrète, avec des détecteurs de mouvement, des senseurs enterrés, des caméras haute vitesse, des caméras avec vision de nuit, des gardes à moto, des barbelés qui détectent tout mouvement, etc).

          RTC était à l’époque l’organisation la plus puissante, la plus élevée dans la hiérarchie et la plus influente des organisations scientologues. Tous ses membres étaient membres de la Sea Org. De ce fait, nous étions l’élite de la Base.

         11. En Mars 1983, je devins Député Inspecteur Général Extérieur, membre du Conseil d’Administration de RTC et Trésorier. (Uniques autres membres : Warren Mc Shane, secrétaire, Vicky Aznaran, Présidente à l’époque). Lorsque l’on m’a nommé membre de RTC, j’ai dû signer une lettre de démission non datée. C’est une pratique normale pour tous les membres de Conseils scientologues, constituant un autre moyen destiné à contrôler les corporations scientologiques tout en  leur laissant une apparence d’intégrité légale.

         12. A ce poste, j’ai voyagé aux USA et à l’étranger pour le compte du RTC. Je suis allé en Allemagne, Italie, Australie, Royaume-Uni, Danemark, Mexique et Canada, parfois à plusieurs reprises. Ces voyages avaient pour but de créer des infrastructures servant d’interface avec le RTC en matière de marques commerciales. Je suis donc familiarisé avec la loi dans chacune de ces pays, où je me suis entretenu avec des cabinets d’avocats dont j’approuvais les documents, et j’y ai placé du personnel en mesure de faire les rapports au RTC, personnel servant de représentant sur place dans les affaires légales etc.

         13. Lorsqu’Hubbard mourut en 1986, il y eut un lutte de pouvoir au sein de la scientologie durant quelques 18 mois, ayant pour effet l’expulsion de l’assistant d’Hubbard le plus puissant alors, Pat Broeker. Le pouvoir fut pris par David Miscavige qui purgea alors l’organisation de tous ceux qui étaient amis de Pat Broeker. A mi-87, on m’ôta de mon psote et on m’emprisonna à “Happy Valley”, propriété de l’organisation située quelques kms à l’Ouest de Gold, largement dans l’enclave de la Réserve Indienne de Soboba. Je suppose que la résignation que j’avais écrite lors de ma nomination au Conseil d’Administration fut alors utilisée pour faire croire que j’avais démissionné, alors que ce n’était pas le cas. Quelques mois plus tard, il était décidé que je m’enfuirais, on me donna diverses tâches à Gold, mais sous bonne garde. Je touchais la paye ordinaire de la Sea Org, 140 F par seminae (24$).

         14. Il me faut clairifier pourquoi j’ai (ou d’autres ont) toléré un tel traitement aussi longtemps. L’aptitude à supporter des conditions et un traîtement aussi abusif fait partie d’une des exigences les plus nettes dans la Sea Org et du RTC. Nous étions sélectionnés et promus en raison de notre loyauté et tolérance démontrées jour après jour. C’est l’aptitude d’un membre de la Sea Org à recevoir les ordres, les éxécuter, tolérer des conditions dégradantes pour l’être qui donne de la valeur vis à vis des supérieurs et du système. C’est pourquoi on m’a promu aussi haut, pourquoi j’en ai toléré davantage encore. Si je revois ceci, je ne peux croire que j’ai réellement supporté un tel avilissement , une tel abus, et à quel point je me suis trompé sur ce qui était bon pour moi et pour les autres.

         15.  Fin 1991, ma femme Monika tomba enceinte. Malgré notre exaltation à cette idée, on lui ordonna de se faire avorter: en effet, on n’autorise pas les membres de la Sea Org à avoir des enfants. cet ordre nous désespéra tous deux. Notre dévouement à la Sea Org était en complète contradiction avec notre désir d’avoir un enfant. En dépit de notre cauchemar et de ma résistance à cet ordre, cela fut fait. Monika fut totalement abattue par le contrecoup de ce qu’elle subissait, et c’est alors qu’elle m’annonça son désir de partir. Nous fuîmes, avec l’organisation à nos trousses cherchant à nous récupérer. Ils y parvinrent et nous convainquirent de revenir afin que nous “partions convenablement”.

         16. Dès que nous fûmes à nouveau derrière les barbelés et les gardes, c’est sous la menace de ne plus revoir son père et sa soeur (également membres de la Sea Org) que Monika dût signer certains documents.

         17. Voilà donc une autre méthode de pression que cache l’organisation. Tout comme dans les états policiers, elle peut ordonner et imposer à ses membres de ne plus avoir de relations familiales, voire, de se retourner contre la famille. Monika et moi savions que si elle le dsirait, l’organisation pourrait la tenir à l’écart de son père et de sa soeur (grâce aux contrôle exercé sur eux), si bien qu’elle ne pourrait plus les voir ni leur rendre visite. Ceci s’appelle “déconnection” en scientologie Nous avons accepté de signer les papiers et avons pu partir.

         18. Le 26 juillet 1998, l’un des avocats de la secte expédia un long fax à Dan Liepold, pour m’obliger au silence; ce n’était pas leur première menace voilée à mon encontre. L’avocat de la scientologie avait inclus les documents qu’ils m’avaient fait signer, que j’avais accepté de signer sous les conditions ci-dessus. J’inclus cette lettre et les documents que j’ai été forcé à signer sous contrainte comme première preuve de ce que pratique la secte pour faire taire ceux qui voudraient parler. (pièce jointe n°1). Cela ne me surprend pas, puisqu’il s’agit d’une tactique courante de créer ou faire signer un document mettant la personne en cause, document qu’on utilisera en cas de besoin.

         19. J’ai aussi assisté à la destruction et à l’altération de documents pour la protection du groupe. Vers Avril 83, j’étais présent lors d’une réunion à Los Angeles, Californie, au bureau scientologique d’A.S.I. (Société de Services à l’Auteur). ASI se présentait comme “agent littéraire” pour Hubbard, mais c’était en réalité la tête de l’empire hubbardien à cette époque. Toute la scientologie était dirigée depuis ASI. C’est à ASI que diverses entités scientologues venaient prendre leurs ordres.

         20. David Miscavige était présent lors de cette réunion – il  était alors patron d’ASI, ainsi que Vicky Aznaran, qui tenait le poste de Député Inspecteur Général du RTC et Lymon Spurlock, “Directeur des affaires de Clientèle” pour ASI. M. Miscavige s’est inquiété lors de ce rassemblement de la possibilité d’une descente du FBI sur la scientologie. Aucune des églises n’avait encore reçu le statut d’exemption d’impôt aux USA.

         21. Une des causes de principe ayant empèché cet accord d’exemption par l’IRS venait du fait que le fondateur de la scientologie, Hubbard, était en fait agent dirigeant de l’organisation , en complète contradiction avec les statuts légaux. Nous  savions pertinemment que cela violait les règles de l’IRS et qu’il fallait le cacher.

         22. On s’inquiétait du fait que l’IRS puisse obtenir des centaines d’ordres quotidiens, hebdomadaires et mensuels écrits par Hubbard et distribués dans toute la scientologie. Ces ordres étaient en général appelés des “conseils” afin d’éviter qu’ils ne fassent apparaître le commandement scientologique exercé par Hubbard. C’était le fait que ces ordres et “conseils” puissent servir pour démontrer le commandement exercé qui constituait le coeur du problème.

         23.Comme on craignait déjà qu’un “avis” de LRH ne puisse tomber en de mauvaises mains, ses ordres étaient écrits de façon à pouvoir nier qu’ils émanaient de lui. Son nom n’y apparaissait pas. Il n’était jamais cité, sauf à la troisième personne. Il n’y avait pas de signature et les réponses qu’on faisait ne portaient qu’un “Dear Sir” – Cher Monsieur. L’envoi ne comportait qu’un simple “*” astérisque pour le routage. Néanmoins, si quelqu’un mettait son nez là-dedans, il serait fort peu resté de doutes quant au fait que nous étions en communication avec Hubbard via ASI., et qu’il nous disait , à nous et à toutes les entités, comment faire plus d’argent pour son compte.

         24. David Miscavige déclara précisément qu’ASI “s’occupait déjà du problème” en se débarrassant de tous les documents impliquant le commandement exercé par Hubbard sur la scientologie.  Il annonça qu’il avait ordonné que les “conseils” et ordres de LRH soient rassemblés et expédiés par camion dans une usine de recyclage du Comté de Riverside, où les documents seraient mis en pâte, méthode paraît-il meilleure que le simple déchiquetage.  Je reçus des instructions afin de débarrasser les autres organisations scientologues des ordres de LRH. Ceci incluait la CSC (église de scientologie de Californie), la CSI (église de scientologie, Internationale) et le RTC.

         25. Plusieurs semaines après, je fus convié à une seconde réunion au sujet de la poursuite de la destruction de la documentation concernant l’organigramme légal des entités. Etaient présents: David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicky Aznaran, Norman Starkey et Marty Rathbun. Nous apprîmes de Miscavige qu’un tribunal avait ordonné pour la première fois de produire des documents concernant un ancien membre de la scientologie nommé Lawrence Wollersheim, qui était en procès contre l’église de scientologie de Californie (CSC). La Cour avait ordonné la production du dossier de “préclair” complet de M. Wollersheim.

         26. Un “dossier de préclair” n’est que l’un des dossiers conservés au sujet des membres. Le dossier de pc contient les enregistrements écrits de toutes les “confessions” faites par l’adepte. Cela signifie qu’il contient non seulement les choses les plus génantes, mais qu’il indique aussi les problèmes qu’une personne peut avoir avec l’organisation, y compris ses réclamations. Ce dossier de préclair grossit au fur et à mesure de l’avancée en scientologie.

         27. Le dossier de M. Wollersheim contenait plusieurs milliers de pages, et faisait 1,80 d’épaisseur. Au début de cette réunion, il fut décidé que ce dossier serait rédigé et arrangé afin  de faire disparaître toute preuve ou document pouvant assister M. Wollersheim lors de son procès contre la CSC. On s’inquiétait aussi du fait que des matériaux confidentiels des niveaux Clair, OT 1, OT2, OT 3 et ‘NED pour OTs” seraient accessibles pour inspection publique au cas où l’on produirait bel et bien les dossiers. On enseigne aux scientologues qu’on peut mourir de pneumonie si l’on apprend, sans une très longue préparation, ce que contiennent ces niveaux secrets. En définitive, nous produisîmes une cinquantaine de pages au tribunal. Le dossier de M. Wollersheim fut purgé sur ordre expresse de David Miscavige.

         28. On m’informa par la suite qu’un second ordre du tribunal exigeait de produire tout le dossier de M. Wollersheim. Face à cette menace, David Miscavige donna ordre de réduire tout le dossier à l’état de pâte à papier.

         29. Toujours sur ordre de David Miscavige, j’ai ordonné à Ricky Aznaran de prendre les dossiers de M. Wollersheim et de les amener à l’usine de recyclage de Riverside pour qu’ils soient ainsi détruits. Quelques heures plus tard, M. Aznaran revint et confirma que les dossiers avaient été mis en pâte et me montra même une petite bouteille en disant “voilà ce qu’il en reste”.

         30.  Le matériel dont David Miscavige avait ordonné la destruction et que Ricky Aznaran avait fait réduire en pâte était celui que le tribunal avait ordonné de produire dans le procès Wollersheim contre CSC à Los Angeles.

         31. Début 1983, j’ai assisté à une réunions au bureau scientologue d’ASI de Los Angeles. S’ytrouvaient: David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicky Aznaran, Patricia Brice et Edith Buchele. Il avait trait aux droits d’auteur (copyrights) de la scientologie. David Miscavige indiqua entre autres que le scientologie avait des “problèmes” à propos du statut des droits d’auteur de nombreux matériaux publiés par Hubbard en train de devenir “matériaux publics” du fait qu’ils n’avaient pas été enregistrés durant des années au bureau des Copyrights des USA. David Miscavige indiqua que la scientologie avait omis de faire enregistrer les copyrights de milliers de pages de matériaux scientologiques écrits par Hubbard. Ceci comprenait nombre de Lettres de Règlements et Bulletins publiés par LRH. Hubbard écrivait différents documents, dont les “Policy Letters, ou Lettres de Règlements” – imprimées en vert sur blanc; des ‘LRH EDs’ ou Directives de l’Exécutif de LRH, utilisées pour diverses causes (imprimées en bleu sur blanc) et des “Bulletins Techniques ou HCOBs” au sujet des aspects techniques de la scientologie, des technologies d’audition, des règlements et d’éthique.

         32. A cette même réunion, David Miscavige ordonna spécifiquement à Patricia Brice (qui était alors secrétaire personnelle d’Hubbard et employée par l’ASI) de commencer à procéder à l’enregistrement en masse de toutes les oeuvres d’Hubbard. Ceci fut ordonné en dépit du fait que M. Miscavige savait déjà que nombre de ces matériaux faisaient déjà partie du domaine public. Je sais donc personnellement qu’au début 1983, la scientologie entama un vaste programme destiné à enregistrer l’oeuvre de M. Hubbard au Bureau des Enregistrements des Copyrights pour les USA.

         33. Compte tenu des nombreuses années passées à lire les directives scientologiques, dont le temps passé comme “Superviseur de la Co-audition” [audition d’étudiants en tandem, ndt] et comme “Inspecteur Général Officier de Repèchage”, je connais très bien le contenu, la forme, la distribution et la publication des oeuvres et des directives scientologiques, y compris celles de Ron Hubbard. En tant qu’officier de Repèchage, ma tâche consistait à m’assurer que ceux qui utilisaient la “technologie” scientologue collent parfaitement aux directives officielles de la scientologie.

     34. Le conseiller de M. Wollersheim m’a demandé de revoir les pièces BPI (émission au grand public, ndt)  jointes  aux fins de la révision de la demande de jugement sommaire. Elles occupaient plus de 20 cartons. En parcourant ces boites de pièces, j’ai choisi des documents au hasard pour les inspecter. Le tableau ci-après explique le résultat de cet examen de certaines pièces. Lors de l’examen des pièces du plaingnant M. Wollersheim, j’ai comparé les originaux supposés de LRH à certaines éditions antérieures dans une compilation contenant ces mêmes documents. J’ai utilisé une “Edition n° 1” de l’OEC, le “Cours d’Organisation pour Cadres” de la scientologie pour comparaison avec ce que “BPI ” dit être des originaux de LRH.

         35. J’ai joint ici des copies des diverses pièces de matériaux de LRH qui furent publiées par la scientologie au début des années 70, prouvant de façon évidente que les notices de copyright sur les documents supposés “originaux” n’étaient pas présentes, mais avaient été ajoutées comme “originaux”  postérieurement.

VOIR ICI LE TABLEAU en ANGLAIS

36. Ce tableau documente les observations que j’ai pu faire à l’examen des documents choisis au hasard. A ce propos, je pense que le Tribunal  devrait noter ce qui suit:

         1. Les pièces B-1289; 1290; 1291; 1292 and 1293 contiennent une notice de copyright de  1953 . Les enregistrements ont pourtant été exécutés pour une publication de compilation datant de 1955.

         2. Les pièces  B4; B-94 and B-215 ont des notices des années 50, 60 et 70 parlant de la CSI. La CSI est l’église de scientologie internationale, née en 1981. Par conséquent, ces “originaux” n’en sont pas, ou bien les notices ont été placées sur les documents longtemps après leur publication. (voir pièces 2,3,4 jointes).

         3. Les pièces B-59; B-369; and B-371 ont des notices de copyright de 1958. Pourtant, ces originaux comparés à ceux de la première édition des compilations des années 70 n’ont pas ces notices de copyright, ce qui indique qu’elles ont été ajoutées dans les “originaux” après la compilation en question. (Pièces 5 à 7)

         4.  La pièce B-2 est nettement différente de celle publiée dans le cours OEC d’origine, dans le volume 2, 1ère édition de 70 (Pièce jointe n°8)

         5.La pièce fournie à Factnet B-1827 ne ressemble pratiquement pas à l’original BPI.

         6. Pièces  B-1288; B-214; and C-3. Les originaux BPI ne contiennent pas de notice de copyright.

         7. La pièce B-1 montre qu’il s’agit non pas d’un original, mais d’une “publication II”

         8. Les pièces B-248, B-249 et B-157 indiquent au début qu’elles ont été publiées ailleurs avant la publication “originale”.

         37. En vertu de mes connaissances en tant que membre du staff scientologue, comprenant ma fonction “d’Officier de Repèchage en Chef”, et d’après l’examen des pièces soumises par BPI pour supporter leur demande renouvelée de jugement sommaire, il apparaît que nombre des “originaux” soumis par BPI ne sont pas du tout des originaux et que les notices de copyright ont été ajoutées aux documents bien après la publication, en faussant cette date de copyright;

    Le déclarant n’a rien d’autre à ajouter pour l’instant.

    Je déclare, sous peine de pénalité de parjure, en vertu des lois des Etats-Unis d’Amérique et de celles de l’tat de Californie, que ce qui précède est vrai et correct. Exécuté ce jour 27 juillet 1998, à Santa Ana, Californie.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute a legal advice. Please review our disclaimer